Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- PART I EXPANDING JUDICIAL ROLES IN NEW OR RESTORED DEMOCRACIES
- 1 The Politics of Courts in Democratization
- 2 Fragmentation? Defection? Legitimacy?
- 3 Constitutional Authority and Judicial Pragmatism
- 4 Distributing Political Power
- 5 The Transformation of the Mexican Supreme Court into an Arena for Political Contestation
- Part II EXPANDING JUDICIAL ROLES IN ESTABLISHED DEMOCRACIES
- PART III FOUR “PROVOCATIONS”
- Conclusion Of Judicial Ships and Winds of Change
- Index
- References
5 - The Transformation of the Mexican Supreme Court into an Arena for Political Contestation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2013
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- PART I EXPANDING JUDICIAL ROLES IN NEW OR RESTORED DEMOCRACIES
- 1 The Politics of Courts in Democratization
- 2 Fragmentation? Defection? Legitimacy?
- 3 Constitutional Authority and Judicial Pragmatism
- 4 Distributing Political Power
- 5 The Transformation of the Mexican Supreme Court into an Arena for Political Contestation
- Part II EXPANDING JUDICIAL ROLES IN ESTABLISHED DEMOCRACIES
- PART III FOUR “PROVOCATIONS”
- Conclusion Of Judicial Ships and Winds of Change
- Index
- References
Summary
“In the process of transformation of a post-colonial regime, judicial leadership matters. Public Interest Litigation began with a letter addressed to the Supreme Court from an inmate imprisoned in the South of India. After I read the communication, I decided to visit the poorest areas in India. I spoke with the less advantaged citizens and I got to know their needs. Based on those needs, I developed my own social philosophy and promoted important changes within the Supreme Court.”
– From my interview with Chief Justice N.P. Bhagwati in New Delhi, India, on July 17, 2010Between 1929 and 2000, the legislative and judicial branches of the Mexican government were subordinated to the executive's control. In theory, the separation of powers was recognized by the dominant political party, the Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI), as a leading tenet defining the governmental structure. However, in practice, the president limited the powers of the other branches through various constitutional reforms. These institutional reforms effectively restricted the Mexican Supreme Court from properly functioning as arbiter between the presidential and congressional powers, and from protecting fundamental rights. The court system essentially preserved authoritarian rule and the Mexican Supreme Court turned into a passive and unimportant institution. Judges aligned themselves with the executive in an effort to avoid any kind of confrontation. As Domingo (2004) describes, the judiciary responded to the wishes of the executive as expressed through a number of formal and informal pressures and incentives such as political rewards and career incentives.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Consequential CourtsJudicial Roles in Global Perspective, pp. 138 - 160Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
References
, . 1997. La Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación protagonista del cambio en la consolidación del Estado de Derecho. Mexico City: Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación.Google Scholar
. 1996. The Unmasking of Civil Society in Mexico: The EZLN Discourse on Democratic Development. British Columbia: Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
. 2005. La Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación y el Control Previo de los Tratados Internacionales en México. Mexico City: Porrúa.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Dos Cumbres Profesionales,” in Dr. Juventino Castro y Castro, Mexico City: Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación.Google Scholar
. 2004. La Descomposición Cultural en México: Estrategia para una cruzada contra la corrupción. Mexico City: Grupo Enlace.Google Scholar
. 2001. La Teoría Constitucional de la Suprema Corte. Mexico City: Doctrina Jurídica Contemporánea.Google Scholar
. 2005a. Génesis y “Evolución del Acceso a la Información en el Poder Judicial de la Federación,” in A un año de la expedición del Reglamento de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación y del Consejo de la Judicatura e en materia de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información. Mexico City: Supreme Court of Mexico.Google Scholar
. 2005b. Constitucionalismo Iberoamericano y migración de criterios, 10 años de la Novena Época, Discursos, Mexico City, Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Los Abogados y la necesidad de una teoría de la Constitución en México,” Este País184.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Winners and Losers: Preliminary Reflections on the 2000 Presidential Elections in Mexico,” European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 70, April, p. 79.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Judicialization of Politics or Politicization of the Judiciary? Recent Trends in Latin America.” Democratization, 11(1): 104–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1998. The Rights Revolution. Lawyers, Activists and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: The University of Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Constitutional Review in the Global Context,” 6 N.Y.U. J. LEGIS. & PUB. POL’Y, 49: 51–52.Google Scholar
. 2000.“Judicial Independence: The Politics of the Supreme Court in Mexico,” Journal of Latin American Studies, 32(3): 705–735.Google Scholar
. 2003. “The Supreme Court Decisions on Electoral Rules after Mexico's 1994 Judicial Reform: An Empowered Court,” Journal of Latin American Studies, 35: 777–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Judicial Reform as Insurance Policy: Mexico in the 1990s,” Latino American Politics and Sociology, 46(4): 87.Google Scholar
. 1981. “The Writ of Amparo in Latin America,” Lawyer of the Americas, 13(3): 361–391.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Judicial Reform in Mexico: What's Next?” in Beyond the Common Knowledge: Empirical Approaches to the Rule of Law, and (eds.), Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2007. “The Role of Lawyers in the Mexican Justice System in Reforming the Administration of Justice in Mexico,” and (eds.), South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
. 1993. “La Suprema Corte de Justicia de México como Tribunal Constitucional,” Revista Jurídica de Petróleos Mexicanos, No. 59–60.Google Scholar
. 1974. “Why the Haves Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” Law & Society Review, 9: 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “Sin Independencia no somos nada,”Mexico City: Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación.Google Scholar
. 2000. “El Estado de Derecho como promotor del Desarrollo Económico Nacional, Suprema Corte de Justicia,”Mexico City: Suprema Corte.Google Scholar
. 2005. “La Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación como árbitro nacional, a diez años de la reforma constitucional,” Lex, 118.Google Scholar
. 2005. “La participación de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación en la construcción del modelo democrático mexicano,” Lex, Volume 116.Google Scholar
, , and (Eds.). 2007. Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex for Political Change. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
. 2009. “Clínicas de Interés Social y Litigios de Interés Público, para bienestar con garantías universales,” Compromiso: Revista del Poder Judicial de la Federación, October.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Judicial Reform in Mexico: Political Insurance or the Search for Political Legitimacy?” Political Research Quarterly, 62(4): 753–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1996. “La Suprema Corte como Tribunal Constitucional,” Estudios Parlamentarios del Congreso, September–October, pp. 72–77.Google Scholar
, . 1980. “The Neglected Role of Law in the Political System,” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
1990. “Legal Mobilization for Social Reform: Power and Politics of Agenda Setting,” Law & Society Review, 24(1): 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2009. Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003.“Authoritarianism, Democracy and the Supreme Court: Horizontal Exchange and the Rule of Law in Mexico” in Democratic Accountability in Latin America, and (eds.), New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and . 2006. “An Authoritarian Enclave? The Supreme Court in Mexico's Emerging Democracy.” Paper presented at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, September.
. 1988. Changing Times in Trial Courts, Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
. 2007. The Struggle for Constitutional Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “The Political Origins of ‘Rule-by-Law’ Regimes,” Prepared for presentation at Yale University Workshop on the Rule of Law, March 28–29.
. 1995. “Mexico: Democracy and Human Rights,”Hemispheric World Policy Institute, July, p. 69.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Fragmentation of Power and the Emergence of an Effective Judiciary in Mexico,” 1994–2002 Latin American Politics & Society, 49(1): 31–57.Google Scholar
, 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Court Bring about Social Change?Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. “The Political Context: Nullifying the Punitive of the Court's Legal Formal Rulings and the Attempt to Continue the Reign of Informal, Case-by-Case Justice.” In Elites, Masses, and the Struggle for Democracy in Mexico: A Culturalist Approach. Boston: Praeger, 2–4.Google Scholar
. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy and Political Change. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
. 1981. Courts. A Comparative and Political Analysis, Chicago: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
. 1994. “The Judicialization of Politics.” International Political Science Review, 15(2): 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2002. On Law, Politics and Judicialization, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Lobbying for Judicial Reform: The Role of the Mexican Supreme Court in Institutional Selection,” Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California at San Diego.
. 2008. “Cabildeo por una Reforma Judicial: El papel de la Suprema Corte Mexicana en la selección institucional,” in La Reforma de la Justicia en México, México City: El Colegio de México-Centro de Estudios Sociológicos. pp. 267–297.Google Scholar
. 2010. Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Court Reform and Judicial Leadership: Judges George Nicola and the New Jersey Justice System. Boston: Praeger.Google Scholar
, “Sin Independencia no somos nada” (México: Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, August 2000)
- 3
- Cited by