Introduction

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139208758.003

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2014

Edited and translated by

P. Tzamalikos

Show author details

P. Tzamalikos: Affiliation:
Aristotle University, Thessaloniki

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The Codex

Codex 573 of the Metamorphosis cloister (the Μεγάλον Μετέωρον, the Great Meteoron) is a little token of the fate of old treasures of all kinds over the centuries. More specifically, it betokens the conflict waged in Greece in 1882, over preservation of extant manuscripts, shortly after Greece had become an independent state, after the annexation of Thessaly, while Northern Greece was still under the rule of Ottoman Turks. One facet of this battle was the enterprise by the newly independent state to bring all manuscripts that had remained after centuries of looting together for preservation in the National Library in Athens. This story I will relate shortly. Another facet of this battle is the one between scholars striving to capture the glory of originality in recording and cataloguing manuscripts. This story I will not relate, since this is the same everywhere in the world of scholars.

In the seventeenth century, a Cypriot monk called Athanasius had bought manuscripts from Meteora by weight. During the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, monks used to sell manuscripts to visitors from Western Europe. However disturbing to later locals the phenomenon may have appeared, this was the cause for many texts being saved and respected. When the government sent two savants to collect manuscripts for the National Library in Athens (in the late nineteenth century), this resulted in a real war between the peasants (including wives and children) and the state military force. Locals saw the removal of manuscripts from Meteora to the National Library of Athens as either a sacrilege, or appropriation of treasures belonging to the convents. Earlier still, the two savants, escorted by the same soldiers and faced with the resistance of the monks objecting to the removal of all extant books from the country to the capital, had taken by force all the books that were not hidden, and packed them in cases. However, the peasants who fell upon the military convoy, proved victorious. As a result, the government decided to yield to the will of the regional people, and only nine boxes with about 350 manuscripts were taken to Athens to be lodged in the National Library. This was virtually nothing, when one considers that the monastery of Metamorphosis alone has more than six hundred manuscripts.

Type: Chapter
Information: An Ancient Commentary on the Book of Revelation
A Critical Edition of the Scholia in Apocalypsin
, pp. 1 - 94

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139208758.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bogiadjedes, J. (c. 1900)

Nicol, Donald M., Meteora: The Rock Monasteries of Thessaly (London 1963) pp. 191–99Google Scholar

Bees, N., ‘Die Kollation der Apokalypse Johannis mit dem Kodex 573 des Meteoronklosters’, Zeitschrift für neutestamentliche Wissenschaft, 13 (1912), 260–265Google Scholar

Diobouniotis, C., Hippolytus Danielcommentar in Handschrift No 573 des Meteoronklosters. TU 38, 1 (Leipzig, 1911)Google Scholar

Tzamalikos, P., A Newly Discovered Greek Father, Cassian the Sabaite Eclipsed by ‘John Cassian’ of Marseilles, A Critical Edition from an Ancient Manuscript with Commentary and an English Translation (Leiden 2012)Google Scholar

Tzamalikos, P., The Real Cassian Revisited, Monastic Life, Greek Paideia, and Origenism in the Sixth Century, A Critical Study of an Ancient Manuscript (Leiden, 2012)Google Scholar

Hoskier, H. C., ‘Manuscripts of the Apocalypse – Recent Investigations. I’, Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 7 (1922–23), 120–137 and 2 platesCrossRef Google Scholar

Concerning the Text of the Apocalypse. Collations of all Existing Available Greek Documents with the Standard Text of Stephens’s Third Edition, together with the Testimony of Versions, Commentaries and Fathers. 2 vols. (London, 1929), vol. 1, pp. 637–652

Teill, , Der Apokalypse-Kommentar des Andreas von Kaisareia 2 vols. (Munich, 1956)Google Scholar

Teil, , Die alten Stämme (Munich, 1955), pp. 9Google Scholar

Elliott, J. K. gives an account of the proportions: ‘The distinctiveness of the Greek manuscripts of the Book of Revelation’, Journal of Theological Studies, NS 48 (1997) 116–124CrossRef Google Scholar

Kilpatrick, G. D., ‘Professor J. Schmid on the Greek text of the Apocalypse’, Vigiliae Christianae, 130 (1959), 1–13 (pp. 3–4)Google Scholar

Diobouniotis, K. and Harnack, A., Der Scholien-Kommentar des Origenes zur Apokalypse Johannis nebst einem Stück aus Irenaeus, Lib. V, Graece, TU, 38,3 (Leipzig, 1911), p. 81Google Scholar

Charles, R. H., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Revelation of St John, 2 vols. (Edinburgh, 1920), vol. 1, pp. clxxvi– clxxviiGoogle Scholar

Nerses of Lambron, Commentary on the Revelation of Saint John, translation of the Armenian text, notes and introduction by Thomson, Robert W., (Leuven, 2007), pp. 4–5Google Scholar

Alberigo, Giuseppe (ed.), Conciliorum Oecumenicorum Generaliumque Decreta, Concilium Constantinopolitanum 381 (Brepols 2006), p. 63

Bauer, Walter, Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity, ed. Kraft, R. A. and Krodel, G. from the 2nd German edn (1934), (Philadelphia, 1971), p. 45Google Scholar

Zuberi, Masarrat Husain, Aristotle 384–322 BC and Al Gazali 1058–1111 AD (Karachi, Pakistan, 1986)Google Scholar

Stephanides, B., Ecclesiastical History (Ἐκκλησιαστικὴ Ἱστορία) (Athens, 1959)Google Scholar

Diekamp, F., Doctrina Patrum De Incarnatione Verbi (Münster, 1907), p. 225Google Scholar

Roberts, Alexander and Donaldson, James, ‘Introductory Note to Clement of Alexandria’, The Ante-Nicene Fathers (Grand Rapids 1983), v. 2, p. 166Google Scholar

Theodoret de Cyr, Thérapeutique des maladies helléniques, ed. and French transl. by Canivet, Pierre, 2 vols. Paris 1958Google Scholar

Canivet, P., Histoire d’une enterprise apologétique au Ve siècle (Paris 1957), p. 162Google Scholar

Siniossoglou, N., Plato and Theodoret (Cambridge, 2008), p. 7, n. 19Google Scholar

des Places, É., ‘Le Platon de Théodoret: les citations des Lois et de l’Epinomis’, Revue des Études Greques, 68 (1955) 171–84CrossRef Google Scholar

‘Le Platon de Théodoret: les citations du Phédon, de la République et du Timée’, in Studi in onore di A. Calderini e R. Paribeni, (Milan, 1956), vol. I, pp. 325–336

Canivet, Pierre, Histoire d’une enterprise apologétique au Ve siècle . (Paris, 1957), p. 263Google Scholar

Canivet, P. (ed.), Théodoret de Cyr. Thérapeutique des maladies helléniques, Sources chrétiennes 57 (Paris, 1958)

Canivet, P. and Leroy-Molinghen, A. (eds.), Théodoret de Cyr. L’histoire des moines de Syrie, 2 vols., Sources chrétiennes 234, 257, (Paris, 1977–1979)

Harl, M., La chaîne Palestinienne sur le Psaume 118 (Origène, Eusèbe, Didyme, Apollinaire, Athanase, Théodoret), Sources chrétiennes, 189 (Paris, 1972)Google Scholar

Mercati, G., Note di letteratura biblica e cristiana antica (Studi e testi, 5), Rome, 1901, p. 29Google Scholar

Bethe, E., Pollucis Onomasticon, 2 vols. Lexicographi Graeci 9.1–9.2 (Leipzig, 1900–1931 (repr. 1967))Google Scholar

Lejay, Paul, article in the Catholic Encyclopedia, v. 9 (New York, 1913), lemma ‘Janus Lascaris’Google Scholar

Legrand, É., Cent-dix lettres greques de François Filelfe (Paris, 1892), pp. 363–366 (p. 366)Google Scholar

Irenaeus, , Contra Haereses, ed. Rousseau, A., Doutreleau, L., and Mercier, C., Irénée de Lyon. Contre les hérésies, livre 5, vol. 2, Sources chrétiennes 153 (Paris, 1969)Google Scholar

Otto, J. C. T., ed., Corpus apologetarum Christianorum saeculi secundi, vol. 5, 3rd edn. (Jena, 1881 (repr. 1969)), pp. 2–246

ed. Otto, J. C. T., Corpus apologetarum Christianorum saeculi secundi, vol. 4, third edn. [Jena, 1880 (repr. Wiesbaden, 1969], pp. 100–222

Funk, F. X., ‘Le pseudo-Justin et Théodore de Tarse’, Revue d’Histoire Ecclésiastique (1902), 947–971Google Scholar

Richard, M., ‘Les citations de Théodoret conservées dans la chaîne de Nicétas sur l’évangélie selon saint Luc’, Revue Biblique 43 (1934) 92Google Scholar

Grillmeier, Aloys, Christ in Christian Tradition, v. I, From the Apostolic Age to Chalcedon (451), tr. Bowden, J. S., revised 2nd edn (London, 1975), p. 368Google Scholar

Clayton, Paul, The Christology of Theodoret of Cyrus, (Oxford, 2007), p. 88CrossRef Google Scholar

Ignatius Aphram Barsoum, Patriarch, The Scattered Pearls: A History of Syriac Literature and Sciences, tr. Moosa, Matti (Piscataway, NJ, 2003), pp. 370–371Google Scholar

Klostermann, E., ‘Des Origenes Scholien-Kommentar zur Apocalypse Johannis’, Theologische Literaturzeitung, 37 (1912) 73– 74Google Scholar

Robinson, A., ‘Origen’s comments on the Apocalypse’, Journal of Theological Studies, 13 (1912) 295–97Google Scholar

Turner, C. H., ‘The text of the newly discovered Scholia of Origen on the Apocalypse’, Journal of Theological Studies, 13, (1912) 386–397CrossRef Google Scholar

‘Document: Origen Scholia in Apocalypsin’, Journal of Theological Studies, 25 (1923), 1–16

Wohlenberg, G. conceded the ascription with some reservations: ‘Noch einiges zu dem Scholien-Kommentar (des Origenes) zur Offenbarung Johannis’, Theologisches Literaturblatt, 33 (1912), 217–220Google Scholar

Kelly, J. F. T. thought that he had found medieval testimony that Origen had made Revelation an ad hoc concern of his: ‘Early Medieval evidence for twelve homilies by Origen on the Apocalypse’, Vigiliae Christianae, 39 (1985), 273–279CrossRef Google Scholar

Diekamp, F. reviewing the initial edition of the Scholia, in Theologische Revue, 11 (1912) 51–55

de Boysson, A., ‘Avons-nous un commentaire d’Origène sur l’Apocalypse?’, Revue Biblique Internationale, NS 10 (1913) 555–567Google Scholar

Quasten, J., Patrology (Allen, Tx., 1975)Google Scholar

Strathmann, D., ‘Origenes und die Johannesoffenbarung’, Neue kirchliche Zeitschrift, 34 (1923) 228–236Google Scholar

Schmid, J., Studien zur Geschichte des griechischen Apokalypse-Textes, 1 Teil, (Munich, 1955), p. 158Google Scholar

Charles, R. H., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Revelation of St John, 2 vols. (Edinburgh, 1920), vol. 1, pp. clxxvi–lxxviiGoogle Scholar

Turner, C. H., ‘The text of the newly discovered Scholia of Origen on the Apocalypse’, Scholia i–xxvii: Journal of Theological Studies, 13, (1912) 386–397CrossRef Google Scholar

Turner, C. H., ‘Document: Origen Scholia in Apocalypsin’, Journal of Theological Studies, 25 (1923) 1–16CrossRef Google Scholar

Skard, Seuls addressed the problem in 1936 focusing on some parallels of the Scholia found in Origen. ‘Zum Scholien-Kommentar des Origenes zur Apokalypse Joannis’, Symbolae Osloenses, 15–16 (1936) 204–208CrossRef Google Scholar

Stählin, O., who presented his conclusion in Berliner Philologische Wochenschrift, 32 (1912) 132–140

Schermann, T. in Theologische Revue, 11 (1912) 29

Nautin, P., Origène, (Paris 1977), p. 449Google Scholar

Junod, E., ‘A propos des soi-disant scholies sur l’Apocalypse d’Origène’, Rivista de Storia e Letteratura Religiosa (Firenze) 20 (1984), 112–121Google Scholar

Gumerlock, Francis X., ‘Patristic Commentaries on Revelation’, Kerux, 23 (2008) 3–13Google Scholar

Book contents

Introduction

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive