Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T11:26:38.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 1 - Freud’s theater of the unconscious

Oedipus, Hamlet, and “Hamlet”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

Jean-Michel Rabaté
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Let us begin our rereading process with a few of Freud’s “ten best books ever.” Two on this list are by Shakespeare. Freud, who read and spoke English fluently, had a lifelong passion for Shakespeare. He quotes more than twenty plays in his various works, often from memory, which over time produced a number of revealing slips. One could even assert that Shakespeare became Freud’s guide on the path of discovering a cultural unconscious. Freud felt that he was Shakespeare’s contemporary – at a certain distance from the classical theater of the Greeks and not fully attuned to the work of the Viennese avant-garde. Already at the age of seventeen, he could pun on a line from Twelfth Night I, 1, in a letter to Eduard Silberstein: “‘Frances is the key to the heart,’ you say, adapting Shakespeare, who said the same of music. ‘Young ladies are boring, ergo they are cure for boredom, poison being the best antidote’” (LSFES, p. 40). Here, “Frances” means the French language, and Silberstein and Freud outplay each other in the conceit that an excess of love will cure this disease by surfeit.

Freud and Hamlet

Then, in an important letter to his friend Fliess dated September 21, 1897, Freud suggested that he had wholly identified with Hamlet. This was the same letter in which he announced that he rejected his previous theory of neuroses; it was based on the idea that the perversion of the fathers – that is, their sexual seduction – would produce or precipitate the hysterical symptoms of the daughters. As we have seen, he had already changed his mind about this seduction theory during Dora’s treatment. In 1897, Freud realized that most of these accusations were fantasy-based delusions. Yet, in the context of his letter, accounting for his decision to take a new departure, he slightly misquoted Hamlet. Hamlet had said, “The readiness is all,” but Freud writes, “To be in readiness.” Freud was aware of having produced a “variation” on the hero’s famous words; a deeper identification is nevertheless obvious. Like Hamlet, Freud is full of doubts; the rosy picture of a future leading to “eternal fame” brought by scientific discoveries has faded away. Freud is like Hamlet in that he has to question the very root of desire and to find that desire is founded purely on “psychological” determinations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Michaud, Henriette in Les Revenants de la Mémoire: Freud et Shakespeare, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, The Psychopathology of Everyday Life, trans. Bell, Anthea, New York, Penguin, 2002, pp. 208–209Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, The Interpretation of Dreams, trans. Crick, Joyce, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 204Google Scholar
Freud, S., The Interpretation of Dreams, trans. Strachey, James, New York, Avon Books, 1965, p. 298Google Scholar
Borges, Jorge Luis, “Shakespeare’s Memory” in Collected Fictions, trans. Hurley, Andrew, New York, Penguin, 1998, pp. 508–515Google Scholar
Jones, Ernest, Hamlet and Oedipus, (1949), New York, Doubleday, 1954Google Scholar
Ellmann, Richard, The Consciousness of Joyce, London, Faber, 1977, pp. 54 and 114Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Dover, Hamlet, 2nd ed. 1936, first entitled What Happens in Hamlet, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1959Google Scholar
Sharpe, Ella Freeman, “The Impatience of Hamlet,” in Collected Papers on Psycho-Analysis, London, Hogarth Press, 1950, p. 20Google Scholar
Hamlet, ed. Edwards, Philip, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1985, p. 240
Joyce, James, Ulysses, ed. Gabler, H. W., New York, Random House, 1986, p. 171Google Scholar
Ellmann, Richard, James Joyce, rev. ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1982, pp. 436–437Google Scholar
Gillet, Louis, “The Living Joyce,” in Portraits of the Artist in Exile: Recollections of James Joyce by Europeans, ed. Potts, Willard, Seattle, Wolfhound Press, 1979, p. 191Google Scholar
Mallarmé, Stéphane, Oeuvres Complètes, ed. Mondor, H. and Jean-Aubry, G., Paris, Gallimard, Pléaide, 1945, p. 1564Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S., “Hamlet and His Problems,” in The Sacred Wood, London, Methuen, 1972, p. 98Google Scholar
Guyomard, Patrick, La jouissance du tragique: Antigone, Lacan et le désir de l’analyste, Paris, Aubier, 1992Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques, “Desire and the Interpretation of Desire in Hamlet,” in Literature and Psychoanalysis. The Question of Reading: Otherwise, ed. Felman, Shoshana, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982, p. 12Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, “The Passing of the Oedipus-Complex,” in Sexuality and the Psychology of Love, ed. Rieff, Philip, New York, Collier, 1963, pp. 176–182Google Scholar
Fink, Bruce, “Reading Hamlet with Lacan” in Lacan, Politics, Aesthetics ed. Apollon, Willy and Feldstein, Richard, Albany, SUNY Press, 1996, p. 182Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley, “Hamlet’s Burden of Proof,” in Disowning Knowledge, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987, pp. 179–191Google Scholar
Lupton, Julia Reinhard and Reinhard, Kenneth, After Oedipus: Shakespeare in Psychoanalysis, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1993, pp. 60–118Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, “Psychopathic Characters on the Stage,” Writings of Art and Literature, ed. Hertz, Neil, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1997, p. 92Google Scholar
Politzer, Heinz, Hatte Oedipus einen Oedipus-komplex?, Munich, Piper, 1974Google Scholar
Freud and Tragedy, trans. Mitchell, Michael, Riverside, Ariadne Press, 2006, p. 25Google Scholar
Critchley, Simon and Webster, Jamieson, Stay Illusion: The Hamlet Doctrine, New York, Random House, 2013Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×