Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T09:54:27.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - However incompletely, human

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Joseph R. Slaughter
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Costas Douzinas
Affiliation:
Birkbeck, University of London
Conor Gearty
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

WE have hitherto considered persons in their natural capacities, and have treated of their rights and duties. But, as all personal rights die with the person; and, as the necessary forms of investing a series of individuals, one after another, with the same identical rights, would be very inconvenient, if not impracticable; it has been found necessary, when it is for the advantage of the public to have any particular rights kept on foot and continued, to constitute artificial persons, who may maintain a perpetual succession, and enjoy a kind of legal immortality.

In Königsberg at the end of the eighteenth century, “person” was the basic moral unit anchoring Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative – the name for those creatures whose “rationality” and insuperable “dignity” “already marks them out as an end in itself.” In classical Greece, “person” referred to the “face,” which in Roman theater became a mask worn by an actor, and later the actor himself. In Philadelphia in 1787, at the US Constitutional Convention, “person” was the unit of measure that determined the apportionment of political representation to the states, based on a formula that counted “the whole Number of free Persons”; “all other persons” to be tallied at the discounted rate of five for three. In 1719, on an island in the Orinoco effluence, “person” referred to Poll, Robinson Crusoe’s domesticated parrot, who “was the only Person permitted to talk” to the shipwrecked sailor. In England, during the era of high imperialism, “person” was the legal fiction that gave life to the business corporation (the colonial charter company) and granted immortality to certain rights that would ordinarily “die with the [natural] person.” In 1947, “person” was the “continental” concept internationalized in the draft of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) that, according to Eleanor Roosevelt, started a “storm” among State Department lawyers who insisted that it was a legal figure alien to US law; the storm abated in embarrassment when it was discovered that there was indeed a precedent for “person” in US law, when Supreme Court Justice Roger Taney opined for the majority in the Dred Scott decision in 1857 that “a slave has no juridical personality” and therefore no right to recognition anywhere as a person before the law.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Meanings of Rights
The Philosophy and Social Theory of Human Rights
, pp. 272 - 297
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blackstone, W., Commentaries on the Laws of England (London, 1793–1795), 467.Google Scholar
Kant, I., Groundwork on the Metaphysics of Morals (Cambridge University Press, 1998), 37.Google Scholar
Defoe, D., Robinson Crusoe, Norton Critical Edition (New York: W. W. Norton, 1994), 108.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, E., “Making Human Rights Come Alive,” Speech to Pi Lambda Theta (New York: Columbia University, 30 March 1949)Google Scholar
Borges, J. L., “The Zahir,” in Borges, J. L., A Personal Anthology, (ed.) Kerrigan, A. (New York: Grove Press, 1967)Google Scholar
Borges, , “the Zahir,” (1967), 134–135.
Borges, J. L., “The Zahir,” in Borges, J. L., Labyrinths: Selected Stories & Other Writings, (introd.) Gibson, W. (New York: New Directions, 2007), 156–164 at 156.Google Scholar
Borges, , “The Zahir,” (1967), 128.
Borges, , “The Zahir,” (1967), 134.
Borges, , “The Zahir,” (2007), 163, 164
Borges, , “The Zahir,” (1967), 128.
Dewey, J., “The Historic Background of Corporate Legal Personality,” Yale Law Review, 35(6), 655–673CrossRef
Marx, K., “On the Jewish Question,” in Marx, K. and Engels, F., Collected Works (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1975), 3, 146–174 at 167Google Scholar
Rancière, J., “Who is the Subject of the Rights of Man?,” South Atlantic Quarterly, 103(2/3) (2004), 297–310 at 304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamen, M., “Kinds of Persons, Kinds of Rights, Kinds of Bodies,” Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature, 10(1) (1998), 1–32 at 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nékám, A., The Personality Conception of the Legal Entity (Cambridge. Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1938), 23.Google Scholar
Saleilles, R., De la personnalité juridique: histoire et théories: vingt-cinq leçons d’introduction à un cours de droit civil comparé sur les personnes juridiques (Paris: A. Rousseau, 1910)Google Scholar
Del Vecchio, G., “Right and Human Personality in the History of Thought,” The International Journal of Ethics, 30(2) (1920)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J., “The Historic Background of Corporate Legal Personality,” Yale Law Review, 35(5) (1926)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, P., ‘Nineteenth Century English Company Law and Theories of Legal Personality,” Quaderni Fiorentini, 11/12(1) (1982–1983)Google Scholar
Mark, G. A., “The Personification of the Business Corporation in American Law,” The University of Chicago Law Review, 54(4), 1441–1483 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schane, S. A., “The Corporation is a Person: The Language of a Legal Fiction,” Tulane Law Review, 61, 563–609 (1987)Google Scholar
Nijman, J. E., The Concept of International Legal Personality: an Enquiry into the History and Theory of International Law (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grear, A., Redirecting Human Rights: Facing the Challenge of Corporate Legal Humanity (New York: PalgraveMacmillan, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, F., International Legal Personality (Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate, 2010)Google Scholar
Portmann, R., Legal Personality in International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxi, U., The Future of Human Rights (New Delhi and New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wormser, I. M., Frankenstein Incorporated (New York: Whittlesey House, 1931), 57.Google Scholar
Hartman, S. V., Scenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery and Self-Making in Nineteenth-Century America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Allen, A., “The Political Economy of Blackness: Citizenship, Corporations, and Race in Dred Scott,” Civil War History, 50(3) (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nabers, D., Victory of Law: the Fourteenth Amendment, the Civil War, and American Literature, 1852–1867 (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H., “The Subjects of the Law of Nations,” in Lauterpacht, H., International Legal Personality, Johns, F., (ed.) (Farnham: Ashgate, 2010), 174.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, L., International Law: A Treatise (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1905), 99.Google Scholar
Hickey, J. and James, E., “The Source of International Legal Personality in the 21st Century,” Hofstra Law and Policy Symposium, 21(1) (1997), 1–18 at 9.Google Scholar
Westlake, J., Chapters on the Principles of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 1894), 192.Google Scholar
Anghie, A., Imperialism, Sovereignty, and the Making of International Law (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 3.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti in The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960 (Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
United Nations, Third Session, Proceedings of the Third Social and Humanitarian Committee (Lake Success, NY: Third Committee, 1948), 227.Google Scholar
Watt, I., The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding (1957) (University of California Press, 2001), 60.Google Scholar
Marx, K., Capital: A Critique of Political Economy (Chicago: C. H. Kerr, 1907), 77.Google Scholar
Seidel, M., Robinson Crusoe: Island Myths and the Novel (Boston, Mass.: Twayne, 1991), 79.Google Scholar
Weber, M., Economy and Society (Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press, 1978), 92–93.Google Scholar
Derrida, J., “Declarations of Independence,” in Derrida, J., Negotiations: Interventions and Interviews, 1971–2001, (ed.) Rottenberg, J. (Stanford University Press, 2002), 46–54 at 49.Google Scholar
Alexandrowicz, C. H., The European–African Confrontation: A Study in Treaty Making (Leiden: Sijthoff, 1973), 41–42Google Scholar
Lindley, M. F., The Acquisition and Government of Backward Territory in International Law: Being a Treatise on the Law and Practice Relating to Colonial Expansion (New York: Negro Universities Press, 1969)Google Scholar
Crowe, S. E., The Berlin West African Conference, 1884–1885 (London: Longmans, published for the Royal Empire Society, 1942).Google Scholar
Gott, G., “Imperial Humanitarianism: History of an Arrested Dialectic,” in Hernández-Truyol, B. E., (ed.), Moral Imperialism: A Critical Anthology (New York University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Mockler-Ferryman, A. F., Up the Niger (London: George Philip & Son, 1892), 294.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Joseph R., Human Rights, Inc.: The World Novel, Narrative Form, and International Law (New York: Fordham University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John urged “eliminating the idea of personality until the concrete facts and relations involved have been faced and stated on their own account,” “The Historic Background of Legal Personality,” Yale Law Review, 35(6) (1926), 673.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×