Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T15:35:48.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Noise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2013

Wayne Johnson
Affiliation:
Aeromechanics Branch of NASA Ames Research Center
Get access

Summary

Helicopter Rotor Noise

The helicopter is the quietest VTOL aircraft, but its noise level can still be high enough to compromise its utility unless specific attention is given to designing for low noise. As the restrictions on aircraft noise increase, the rotor noise becomes an increasingly important factor in helicopter design. The complex aerodynamics of rotors lead to a number of significant noise mechanisms. Helicopter rotor noise tends to be concentrated at harmonics of the blade passage frequency NΩ, because of the periodic nature of the rotor as seen in the non-rotating frame. There is sound radiated because the mean thrust and drag forces rotate with the blades and because of the higher harmonic loading as well. The spectral lines are broadened at the higher harmonics because of the random character of the rotor flow, particularly variations in the wake-induced loads. The acoustic pressure signal is basically periodic in time (the period is 2π/NΩ), with sharp impulses due to localized aerodynamic phenomena such as compressibility effects and vortex-induced loads. Figure 14.1 illustrates the spectrum of rotor-generated sound. The contributions to helicopter rotor noise can be classified as vortex or broadband noise, rotational noise, and impulsive noise or blade slap. Although the distinction between these types of rotor noise is not as sharp as was once thought, the classification remains useful for purposes of exposition. Cox (1973), Burton, Schlinker, and Shenoy (1985), and Brentner and Farassat (1994, 2003) have presented summaries of helicopter rotor noise mechanisms and analysis.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baeder, J.D.Euler Solutions to Nonlinear Acoustics of Non-Lifting Rotor Blades.” American Helicopter Society and Royal Aeronautical Society International Technical Specialists Meeting: Rotorcraft Acoustics and Rotor Fluid Dynamics, Valley Forge, PA, October 1991.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G.K.An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. London: Cambridge University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Boxwell, D.A., and Schmitz, F.H.Full-Scale Measurements of Blade-Vortex Interaction Noise.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 27:4 (October 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boxwell, D.A., Yu, Y.H., and Schmitz, F.H.Hovering Impulsive Noise – Some Measured and Calculated Results.” Vertica, 3:1 (1979).Google Scholar
Brentner, K.S.Prediction of Helicopter Rotor Discrete Frequency Noise.” NASA TM 87721, October 1986.Google Scholar
Brentner, K.S.An Efficient and Robust Method for Predicting Helicopter Rotor High-Speed Impulsive NoiseJournal of Sound and Vibration, 203:1 (1997a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentner, K.S.Numerical Algorithms for Acoustic Integrals with Examples for Rotor Noise Prediction.” AIAA Journal, 35:4 (April 1997b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentner, K.S., Burley, C.L., and Marcolini, M.A.Sensitivity of Acoustic Predictions to Variation of Input Parameters.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 39:3 (July 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentner, K.S., and Farassat, F.Helicopter Noise Prediction: The Current Status and Future Direction.” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 170:1 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentner, K.S., and Farassat, F.Analytical Comparison of the Acoustic Analogy and Kirchhoff Formulation for Moving Surfaces.” AIAA Journal, 36:8 (August 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentner, K.S., and Farassat, F.Modeling Aerodynamically Generated Sound of Helicopter Rotors.” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 39:2–3 (February 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burley, C.L., and Brooks, T.F.Rotor Broadband Noise Prediction with Comparison to Model Data.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 49:1 (January 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, D.E., Schlinker, R.H., and Shenoy, R.The Status of Analytical Helicopter Noise Prediction Methods.” NASA CR 172606, August 1985.Google Scholar
Cox, C.R.Aerodynamic Sources of Rotor Noise.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 18:1 (January 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, C.R.Helicopter Noise Certification Experience and Compliance Cost Reductions.” Nineteenth European Rotorcraft Forum, Cernobbio, Italy, September 1993.Google Scholar
Cox, C.R., and Lynn, R.R.A Study of theOrigin and Means of Reducing Helicopter Noise.” TCREC TR 62-73, November 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curle, N.The Influence of Solid Boundaries upon Aerodynamic Sound.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 231:1187 (September 1955).Google Scholar
Davidson, I.M., and Hargest, T.J.Helicopter Noise.” The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, 69:653 (May 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deming, A.F.Noise from Propellers with Symmetrical Sections at Zero Blade Angle.” NACA TN 605, July 1937.Google Scholar
Deming, A.F.Noise from Propellers with Symmetrical Sections at Zero Blade Angle, II.” NACA TN 679, December 1938.Google Scholar
Deming, A.F.Propeller Rotation Noise due to Torque and Thrust.” NACATN 747, January 1940.Google Scholar
di Francescantonio, P.A New Boundary Integral Formulation for the Prediction of Sound Radiation.” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 202:4 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farassat, F.Theory of Noise Generation from Moving Bodies with an Application to Helicopter Rotors.” NASA TR R-451, December 1975.Google Scholar
Farassat, F.Linear Acoustic Formulas for Calculation of Rotating Blade Noise.” AIAA Journal, 19:9 (September 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farassat, F., and Brentner, K.S.The Use and Abuses of the Acoustic Analogy in Helicopter Noise Prediction.” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 33:1 (January 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farassat, F., and Succi, G.P.A Review of Propeller Discrete Frequency Noise Prediction Technology with Emphasis on Two Current Methods for Time Domain Calculations.” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 71:3 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ffowcs Williams, J.E., and Hawkings, D.L.Sound Generation by Turbulence and Surfaces in Arbitrary Motion.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 264A:1151 (May 1969).Google Scholar
Garrick, I.E., and Watkins, C.E.A Theoretical Study of the Effect of Forward Speed on the Free-Space Sound-Pressure Field Around Propellers.” NACA Report 1198, 1954.Google Scholar
Gmelin, B.L., Heller, H., Mercker, E., Philippe, J.-J., Preisser, J.S., and Yu, Y.H.The HART Programme: A Quadrilateral Cooperative Research Effort.” American Helicopter Society 51st Annual Forum, Ft.Worth, TX, May 1995.Google Scholar
Gutin, L.On the Sound Field of a Rotating Propeller.” NACA TM 1195, October 1948.Google Scholar
Hubbard, H.H., and Maglieri, D.J.Noise Characteristics of Helicopter Rotors at Tip Speeds up to 900 Feet Per Second.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32:9 (September 1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, H.H., and Regier, A.A.Free-Space Oscillating Pressures Near the Tips of Rotating Propellers.” NACA Report 996, 1950.Google Scholar
Leverton, J.W., and Pollard, J.S.A Comparison of the Overall and Broadband Noise Characteristics of Full-Scale and Model Helicopter Rotors.” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 30:2 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, M.J.On Sound Generated Aerodynamically. I. General Theory.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 211:1107 (March 1952).Google Scholar
Loewy, R.G., and Sutton, L.R.A Theory for Predicting the Rotational Noise of Lifting Rotors in Forward Flight, Including a Comparison with Experiment.” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 4:3 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowson, M.V.The Sound Field for Singularities in Motion.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 286:1407 (August 1965).Google Scholar
Lowson, M.V., and Ollerhead, J.B.A Theoretical Study of Helicopter Rotor Noise.” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 9:2 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marze, H.J.Helicopter External Noise: ICAO Standards and Operational Regulations.” Eighth European Rotorcraft Forum, Aix-en-Provence, France, September 1982.Google Scholar
Ollerhead, J.B., and Lowson, M.V.Problems of Helicopter Noise Estimation and Reduction.” AIAA Paper No. 69-195, February 1969.Google Scholar
Schlegel, R.G., and Bausch, W.E.Helicopter Rotor Rotational Noise Prediction and Correlation.” USAAVLABS TR 70-1, November 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, R., King, R., and Mull, H.Helicopter Rotor Noise Generation and Propagation.” USAAVLABS TR 66-4, October 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, F.H., and Yu, Y.H.Transonic Rotor Noise – Theoretical and Experimental Comparisons.” Vertica, 5:1 (1981).Google Scholar
Stuckey, T.J., and Goddard, J.O.Investigation and Prediction of Helicopter Rotor Noise. Part I. Wessex Whirl Tower Results.” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 5:1 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Government, “Part 36 – Noise Standards, Aircraft Type and Airworthiness Certification.” Code of Federal Regulations, Title 14, Aeronautics and Space, 2012.
Watkins, C.E., and Durling, B.J.A Method for Calculation of Free-Space Sound Pressures Near a Propeller in Flight Including Consideration of the Chordwise Blade Loading.” NACA TN 3809, November 1956.Google Scholar
Widnall, S.E.A Correlation of Vortex Noise Data from Helicopter Main Rotors.” Journal of Aircraft, 6:3 (May-June 1969).Google Scholar
Yu, Y.H., Caradonna, F.X., and Schmitz, F.H.The Influence of the Transonic Flow Field on High-Speed Helicopter Impulsive Noise.” Fourth European Rotorcraft and Powered Lift Aircraft Forum, Stresa, Italy, September 1978.Google Scholar
Yudin, E.Y.On the Vortex Sound from Rotating Rods.” NACA TM 1136, March 1947.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Noise
  • Wayne Johnson
  • Book: Rotorcraft Aeromechanics
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235655.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Noise
  • Wayne Johnson
  • Book: Rotorcraft Aeromechanics
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235655.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Noise
  • Wayne Johnson
  • Book: Rotorcraft Aeromechanics
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235655.015
Available formats
×