Anscombe, G. E. M.Intention. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1958.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L.Philosophical Papers, ed. Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G. J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Axinn, S. ‘Kant, Authority and the French Revolution’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 32 (1971), 423–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baier, K.The Moral Point of View: A Rational Basis of Ethics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Beck, L. W. ‘Apodictic Imperatives’, Kant-Studien, 49 (1957), 7–23.Google Scholar

Beck, L. W.A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Beck, L. W. ‘Kant and the Right of Revolution’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 32 (1971), 411–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broad, C. D.Five Types of Ethical Theory. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield Adams, 1965 (reprinted).Google Scholar

Chisholm, R. ‘Supererogation and Offence’, Ratio, 5 (1963), 1–14.Google Scholar

D’Arcy, E.Human Acts: An Essay in Their Moral Evaluation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Dietrichson, P. ‘When Is a Maxim Fully Universalizable?’, Kant-Studien, 55 (1964), 143–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duncan, A. R. C.Practical Reason and Morality. Edinburgh: Nelson, 1967.Google Scholar

Ebbinghaus, J. ‘Interpretation and Misinterpretation of the Categorical Imperative’, trans. Paton, H. J., Philosophical Quarterly, 4 (1954), 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenberg, P. ‘Basic Ethical Categories of Kant’s Tugendlehre’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 3 (1966), 255–69.Google Scholar

Ewing, A. C. ‘The Paradoxes of Kant’s Ethics’, Philosophy, 13 (1938), 40–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregor, M. J.Laws of Freedom: A Study of Kant’s Method of Applying the Categorical Imperative in the Metaphysik der Sitten. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1963.Google Scholar

Grice, G. R.The Grounds of Moral Judgement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Haezrahi, P. ‘The Concept of Man as End-in-Himself’, reprinted in Kant: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Wolff, R. P.. London: Macmillan, 1968.Google Scholar

Hare, R. M.Freedom and Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Hill, T. E. ‘Kant on Imperfect Duty and Supererogation’, Kant-Studien, 62 (1971), 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kemp, J. ‘Kant’s Examples of the Categorical Imperative’, Philosophical Quarterly, 8 (1958), 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Körner, S.Kant. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1955.Google Scholar

Locke, D. ‘The Trivializability of Universalizability’, Philosophical Review, 77 (1968), 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H.. Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1957.Google Scholar

Lyons, D.Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Melden, A. I., ed., Essays in Moral Philosophy. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1958.

Mill, J. S. ‘Utilitarianism’ in Utilitarianism, Liberty and Representative Government. London: Everyman’s Library, J. M. Dent, 1968 (reprinted).Google Scholar

Moritz, M.Kant’s Einteilung der Imperative. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1960.Google Scholar

Paton, H. J.The Moral Law. Rev. edn. London: Hutchinson, 1953.Google Scholar

Paton, H. J. ‘An Alleged Right to Lie: A Problem in Kantian Ethics’, Kant-Studien, 45 (1953–54), 190–203.Google Scholar

Paton, H. J.The Categorical Imperative. London: Hutchinson, 1958.Google Scholar

Prichard, H. A.Moral Obligation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D.The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D.Kant’s Ethical Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Simon, M.Models of Man. New York: Wiley & Sons, 1957.Google Scholar

Singer, M. G.Generalization in Ethics: An Essay in the Logic of Ethics with the Rudiments of a System of Moral Philosophy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1961.Google Scholar

Urmson, J. O. ‘Saints and Heroes’, in Essays in Moral Philosophy, ed. Melden, A. I.. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Williams, T. C.The Concept of the Categorical Imperative: A Study of the Place of the Categorical Imperative in Kant’s Ethical Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Wolff, R. P.The Autonomy of Reason: A Commentary on Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. New York: Harper & Row, 1973.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ameriks, Karl. Kant and the Fate of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baron, Marcia W.Kantian Ethics almost without Apology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Beck, Lewis White. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Bittner, Rüdiger. ‘Maximen’, in Akten des 4. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, ed. Funke, G.. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1974, pp. 485–9.Google Scholar

Byrd, Sharon and Hruschka, J.. Kant’s Doctrine of Right: A Commentary. Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christman, John, ed. The Inner Citadel: Essays on Individual Autonomy. Oxford University Press, 1989.

Dworkin, Gerald. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRef

Dworkin, Gerald. ‘The Concept of Autonomy’, in The Inner Citadel: Essays on Individual Autonomy, ed. John, Christman. Oxford University Press, 1989, pp. 54–76.

Dworkin, Ronald. Life’s Dominion. London: HarperCollins, 1983.Google Scholar

Förster, Eckhart, ed. Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three Critiques and the Opus Postumum. Stanford University Press, 1989.

Gewirth, Alan. ‘Ethical Universalism and Particularism’, Journal of Philosophy, 85 (1988), 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, Paul. Kant on Freedom, Law and Happiness. Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henrich, Dieter. ‘Kant’s Notion of a Deduction and the Methodological Background of the First Critique’, in Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three Critiques and the Opus Postumum, ed. Förster, Eckhart. Stanford University Press, 1989, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar

Herman, Barbara. The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Hill, Thomas E. ‘Servility and Self-respect’, Monist, 57 (1973), 87–104 and in his Autonomy and Self-Respect. Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp. 4–18.Google Scholar

Hill, Thomas E. ‘The Kantian Conception of Autonomy’ in his Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant’s Moral Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992, pp. 76–96.Google Scholar

Höffe, Otfried, ed. Immanuel Kant, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2004.

Höffe, Otfried. ‘Kants kategorischer Imperativ als Kriterium des Sittlichen’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 31 (1977), 354–84.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, 1781. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen. Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, 1784. What Is Enlightenment?, trans. Gregor, Mary J., in Kant, Immanuel, Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 1996, 8:35–42.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, 1785. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Gregor, Mary J., in Kant, Immanuel, Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 1996, 4:387–463.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, 1786. What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Thinking?, trans. Wood, Allen W. and Giovanni, George di, in Kant, Immanuel, Religion and Rational Theology. Cambridge University Press, 1996, 8:133–46.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, 1788. Critique of Practical Reason, trans. Gregor, Mary J., in Kant, Immanuel, Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 1996, 5:19–163.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, 1798. The Conflict of the Faculties, trans. Wood, Allen W. and Giovanni, George di, in Kant, Immanuel, Religion and Rational Theology. Cambridge University Press, 1996, 8:233–328.Google Scholar

Kerstein, Samuel J.Kant’s Search for the Supreme Principle of Morality. Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerstein, Samuel J.How to Treat Persons. Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korsgaard, Chrstine. Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lara, Denis, ed., Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Larmore, Charles, ‘Moral Judgment’, Review of Metaphysics, 35 (1981), 275–96.Google Scholar

Levine, Andrew, The Politics of Autonomy: A Kantian Reading of Rousseau’s ‘Social Contract’. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Lindley, Richard. Autonomy. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. ‘The Basic Structure as Subject’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 14 (1977), 159–65.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. ‘Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory’, Journal of Philosophy, 77 (1980), 515–72.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. ‘Justice as Fairness, Political not Metaphysical’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 14 (1985), 223–51.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. The Law of Peoples, in Rawls, John, Collected Papers. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999, pp. 529–64.Google Scholar

Reath, Andrews. Agency and Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory. Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reath, Andrews and Jens, Timmermann. Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ripstein, Arthur. Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneewind, J. B. ‘The Misfortunes of Virtue’, Ethics, 101 (1990), 42–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneewind, J. B.The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya. ‘Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioural Foundations of Economic Theory’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6 1977, 317–44.Google Scholar

Sensen, Oliver, ed. Kant on Moral Autonomy. Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Timmermann, Jens. ‘Kant’s Puzzling Ethics of Maxims’, Harvard Review, 4 (2000), 38–52.Google Scholar

Timmermann, Jens. Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Timmons, Mark, ed., Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. Oxford University Press, 2002.

Trampota, Andreas, Oliver, Sensen and Jens, Timmermann, eds., Kant’s Tugendlehre: A Comprehensive Commentary. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 2012.Google Scholar

Velkley, Richard. Freedom and the End of Reason: On the Moral Foundation of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Weil, Simone [1949]. The Need for Roots: A Prelude to a Declaration of Duties toward Mankind, trans. Wills, A. F.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Bernard. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana, 1985.Google Scholar

Wolterstorff, Nicholas. Justice: Rights and Wrongs. Princeton University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood, Allen W. Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 1989 (articles marked * are included in this volume).

Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, 1996; German edition, Tugend und Gerechtigkeit: Eine konstruktive Darstellung des praktischen Denkens, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1996.

Bounds of Justice. Cambridge University Press, 2000 (articles marked ** are included).

Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge University Press, 2002.

‘Space and Objects’, Journal of Philosophy, 63 (1976), 29–45.

‘Transcendental Synthesis and Developmental Psychology’, Kant-Studien, 75 (1984), 149–67.

*‘Kant after Virtue’, Inquiry, 26 (1984), 387–405.

*‘Between Consenting Adults’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 14 (1985), 252–77.

*‘Consistency in Action’, in Universality and Morality: Essays on Ethical Universalisability, ed. Potter, N. and Timmons, M., Miami, Fl.: Riedel, 1985, pp. 159–86.CrossRef

*‘The Public Use of Reason’, Political Theory, 14 (1986), 523–51.CrossRef

*‘The Power of Example’, Philosophy, 61 (1986), 5–29.CrossRef

*‘Reason and Autonomy in Grundlegung III’, in Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten: Ein kooperativer Kommentar, ed. Höffe, Otfried. Frankfurt-a-M: Klostermann, 1989, pp. 282–98.

*‘The Great Maxims of Justice and Charity’, in Enlightenment, Rights and Revolution, ed. McCormick, Neil and Bankowski, Zenon. University of Aberdeen Press, 1989, pp. 297–308.

*‘Universal Laws and Ends-in-Themselves’, The Monist (1989), 341–61.

‘Agency and Anthropology in Kant’s Groundwork’, in Kant’s Practical Philosophy Reconsidered, ed. Yovel, Y.. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989, pp. 63–82.CrossRef

*‘Constructivisms in Ethics’, Presidential Address, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 89 (1988–89), 1–17.

‘Enlightenment as Autonomy: Kant’s Vindication of Reason’, in The Enlightenment and its Shadows, ed. Hulme, P. and Jordanova, L.. London: Routledge, 1990, pp. 184–99.

‘Kantian Ethics’, in A Companion to Ethics, ed. Singer, P.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991, pp. 175–85.

‘Children’s Rights and Children’s Lives’, in Children’s Rights and the Law, ed. Alson, P., Parker, S. and Seymour, J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.

‘Vindicating Reason’, in The Cambridge Companion to Kant, ed. Guyer, P.. Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 280–308.CrossRef

‘Innerhalb der Grenzen der Bloßen Vernunft’, in Kant über Religion, ed. Ricken, Friedo and Marty, François. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1992.

‘Reason and the Resolution of Disputes’, Notre Dame Law Review, 67 (1992), 1365–84.

**‘Vier Modelle praktischer Vernunft’, in Vernunftbegriffe in der Moderne, ed. Fulda, Hans Fredrich and Horstmann, Rolf-Peter. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1994, 586–606; in English, Four Models of Practical Reasoning, in Bounds of Justice, 11–28.

‘Kommunikative Rationalität und praktische Vernunft’, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 41 (1993), 329–32.

‘Practical Reason and Possible Community: A Reply to Jean-Marc Ferry’, Ratio Juris, 7 (1994), 308–13.CrossRef

‘Kant’s Virtues’, in How Should One Live? Essays on the Virtues, ed. Crisp, Roger. Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 77–97.

‘Principles, Judgment and Institutions’, in Law, Values and Social Practices: The William Galbraith Miller Centenary Lectures in Jurisprudence, ed. Tasioulas, John, Dartmouth: Ashgate, 1997, pp. 59–73. See also revised version with title ‘Principles, Practical Judgment and Institutions’, in Bounds of Justice.

‘Within the Limits of Reason’, in Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls, ed. Korsgaard, Chris, Reath, Andrews and Herman, Barbara. Cambridge University Press, 1997, 170–86.

Kant on Reason and Religion: Reasoned Hope, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 18, ed. Peterson, Grethe B.. University of Utah Press, 1997, pp. 267–90. Text available at .

‘Kant on Reason and Religion: Reason and Interpretation’, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 18, ed. Peterson, Grethe B.. University of Utah Press, 1997, pp. 290–308. Text available at .

‘Kantian Constructivisms’ in Rationalität, Realismus, Revision, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress of the Society of Analytical Philosophy, ed. Nida-Rümelin, Julian. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1999, pp. 3–16.

‘Instituting Principles: Between Duty and Action’, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 36, suppl. vol. (1997) (Spindel Conference Proceedings, Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Nelson Potter and Mark Timmons), 79–96; revised version in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, ed. Timmons, Mark. Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 331–47.

‘Necessary Anthropocentrism and Contingent Speciesism’, Symposium with Allen Wood on ‘Kant on Duties Regarding Non-Rational Nature’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. (1998), 211–28.

‘Political Liberalism and Public Reason: A Critical Notice of John Rawls, Political Liberalism’, Philosophical Review, 106 (1998), 411–28.

**‘Women’s Rights: Whose obligations?’, in Women’s Voices, Women’s Rights, ed. Jeffries, Alison, Oxford Amnesty Lectures. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1999.

‘Kant and the Social Contract Tradition’, in Kant actuel: hommage à Pierre Laberge, ed. Duchesneau, François, Lafrance, Guy and Piché, Claude, Montreal: Bellarmin, 2000, pp. 185–200; slightly revised version in Kant’s Political Theory: Interpretations and Applications, ed. Elisabeth Ellis. Pennsylvania State University Press, 2012.

‘Agents of Justice’, Metaphilosophy, 32 (2001), 180–95 and in Global Justice, ed. Pogge, Thomas W.. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001, pp. 188–203.

‘Practical Principles and Practical Judgement’, Hastings Center Report, 31 (2001), 15–23.CrossRef

‘Sidgwick on Practical Reason’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 109 (2001), 83–9.

‘Kant’s Conception of Public Reason’, in Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung, ed. Gerhardt, Volker, Horstmann, Rolf-Peter and Schumacher, Ralph (Akten des ix. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses), vol. i. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2001, pp. 35–47.CrossRef

‘Autonomy and the Fact of Reason in the Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, 30–41’, in Immanuel Kant, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, ed. Höffe, Otfried (Klassiker Auslegen Bd. 26). Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2002, pp. 81–97.CrossRef

‘Constructivism in Rawls and Kant’, in A Cambridge Companion to John Rawls, ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 347–67.

‘Autonomy: The Emperor’s New Clothes’, The Inaugural Address, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. vol. 77 (2003), 1–21.CrossRef

‘Constructivism vs. Contractualism’, Ratio, 16, no. 4 (December 2003), 319–31 and in On What We Owe Each Other, ed. Stratton-Lake, Philip. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004, pp. 17–31.

‘Kant: Rationality as Practical Reason’, in The Oxford Handbook of Rationality, ed. Mele, Alfred J. and Rawling, Piers. Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 93–109; trans. as ‘Kant: Racjonalność jako rozum praktyczny’, Prezgląd Filozoficzny, 13, no. 4 (2004), 125–45.

‘Consequences for Non-consequentialists’, Utilitas, 16 (2004), 1–11.CrossRef

‘Autonomy, Plurality and Public Reason’, in New Essays on the History of Autonomy, ed. Brender, Natalie and Krasnoff, Larry. Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 181–94.CrossRef

‘Modern Moral Philosophy and the Problem of Relevant Descriptions’, in Modern Moral Philosophy, ed. O’Hear, A., Royal Institute of Philosophy, suppl. vol. 54. Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 301–16.CrossRef

‘Self-Legislation, Autonomy and the Form of Law’, in Recht, Geschichte, Religion: Die Bedeutung Kants für die Gegenwart, ed. Nagl-Docekal, Herta und Langthaler, Rudolf, Sonderband der Deutschen Zeitschrift für Philosophie. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2004, pp. 13–26.CrossRef

**‘Kant’s Justice and Kantian Justice’, in Bounds of Justice, 65–80; trans. as ‘Kantische Gerechtigkeit und kantianische Gerechtigkeit’, in Kants Ethik, ed. Ameriks, Karl. Paderborn: Mentis Verlag, 2004, pp. 58–73.

‘The Dark Side of Human Rights’, International Affairs, 81, no. 2 (2005), 427–39.CrossRef

‘Experts, Practitioners and Practical Judgement’, Journal of Moral Philosophy, 4, no. 1 (2007), 153–66.

‘Normativity and Practical Judgement’, Journal of Moral Philosophy, 4, no. 3 (2007), 393–406.CrossRef

‘Historical Trends and Human Futures’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A, 39, no. 4 (December 2008), 529–34.CrossRef

‘Applied Ethics: Naturalism, Normativity and Public Policy’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 26 (2009), 1–12.

‘Rights, Obligations, Priorities’ (commentary on Nicholas Wolterstorff’s Justice: Rights and Wrongs)’, Studies in Christian Ethics, 23, no. 2 (May 2010), 163–71.

‘Orientation in Thinking: Geographical Problems, Political Solutions’, in Reading Kant’s Geography, ed. Elden, Stuart and Mendieta, Eduardo. New York: University of Stony Brook Press, 2011, pp. 215–32.

Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 1989 (articles marked * are included in this volume).

Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, 1996; German edition, Tugend und Gerechtigkeit: Eine konstruktive Darstellung des praktischen Denkens, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1996.

Bounds of Justice. Cambridge University Press, 2000 (articles marked ** are included).

Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge University Press, 2002.

‘Space and Objects’, Journal of Philosophy, 63 (1976), 29–45.

‘Transcendental Synthesis and Developmental Psychology’, Kant-Studien, 75 (1984), 149–67.

*‘Kant after Virtue’, Inquiry, 26 (1984), 387–405.

*‘Between Consenting Adults’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 14 (1985), 252–77.

*‘Consistency in Action’, in Universality and Morality: Essays on Ethical Universalisability, ed. Potter, N. and Timmons, M., Miami, Fl.: Riedel, 1985, pp. 159–86.CrossRef

*‘The Public Use of Reason’, Political Theory, 14 (1986), 523–51.CrossRef

*‘The Power of Example’, Philosophy, 61 (1986), 5–29.CrossRef

*‘Reason and Autonomy in Grundlegung III’, in Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten: Ein kooperativer Kommentar, ed. Höffe, Otfried. Frankfurt-a-M: Klostermann, 1989, pp. 282–98.

*‘The Great Maxims of Justice and Charity’, in Enlightenment, Rights and Revolution, ed. McCormick, Neil and Bankowski, Zenon. University of Aberdeen Press, 1989, pp. 297–308.

*‘Universal Laws and Ends-in-Themselves’, The Monist (1989), 341–61.

‘Agency and Anthropology in Kant’s Groundwork’, in Kant’s Practical Philosophy Reconsidered, ed. Yovel, Y.. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989, pp. 63–82.CrossRef

*‘Constructivisms in Ethics’, Presidential Address, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 89 (1988–89), 1–17.

‘Enlightenment as Autonomy: Kant’s Vindication of Reason’, in The Enlightenment and its Shadows, ed. Hulme, P. and Jordanova, L.. London: Routledge, 1990, pp. 184–99.

‘Kantian Ethics’, in A Companion to Ethics, ed. Singer, P.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991, pp. 175–85.

‘Children’s Rights and Children’s Lives’, in Children’s Rights and the Law, ed. Alson, P., Parker, S. and Seymour, J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.

‘Vindicating Reason’, in The Cambridge Companion to Kant, ed. Guyer, P.. Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 280–308.CrossRef

‘Innerhalb der Grenzen der Bloßen Vernunft’, in Kant über Religion, ed. Ricken, Friedo and Marty, François. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1992.

‘Reason and the Resolution of Disputes’, Notre Dame Law Review, 67 (1992), 1365–84.

**‘Vier Modelle praktischer Vernunft’, in Vernunftbegriffe in der Moderne, ed. Fulda, Hans Fredrich and Horstmann, Rolf-Peter. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1994, 586–606; in English, Four Models of Practical Reasoning, in Bounds of Justice, 11–28.

‘Kommunikative Rationalität und praktische Vernunft’, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 41 (1993), 329–32.

‘Practical Reason and Possible Community: A Reply to Jean-Marc Ferry’, Ratio Juris, 7 (1994), 308–13.CrossRef

‘Kant’s Virtues’, in How Should One Live? Essays on the Virtues, ed. Crisp, Roger. Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 77–97.

‘Principles, Judgment and Institutions’, in Law, Values and Social Practices: The William Galbraith Miller Centenary Lectures in Jurisprudence, ed. Tasioulas, John, Dartmouth: Ashgate, 1997, pp. 59–73. See also revised version with title ‘Principles, Practical Judgment and Institutions’, in Bounds of Justice.

‘Within the Limits of Reason’, in Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls, ed. Korsgaard, Chris, Reath, Andrews and Herman, Barbara. Cambridge University Press, 1997, 170–86.

Kant on Reason and Religion: Reasoned Hope, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 18, ed. Peterson, Grethe B.. University of Utah Press, 1997, pp. 267–90. Text available at .

‘Kant on Reason and Religion: Reason and Interpretation’, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 18, ed. Peterson, Grethe B.. University of Utah Press, 1997, pp. 290–308. Text available at .

‘Kantian Constructivisms’ in Rationalität, Realismus, Revision, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress of the Society of Analytical Philosophy, ed. Nida-Rümelin, Julian. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1999, pp. 3–16.

‘Instituting Principles: Between Duty and Action’, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 36, suppl. vol. (1997) (Spindel Conference Proceedings, Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Nelson Potter and Mark Timmons), 79–96; revised version in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, ed. Timmons, Mark. Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 331–47.

‘Necessary Anthropocentrism and Contingent Speciesism’, Symposium with Allen Wood on ‘Kant on Duties Regarding Non-Rational Nature’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. (1998), 211–28.

‘Political Liberalism and Public Reason: A Critical Notice of John Rawls, Political Liberalism’, Philosophical Review, 106 (1998), 411–28.

**‘Women’s Rights: Whose obligations?’, in Women’s Voices, Women’s Rights, ed. Jeffries, Alison, Oxford Amnesty Lectures. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1999.

‘Kant and the Social Contract Tradition’, in Kant actuel: hommage à Pierre Laberge, ed. Duchesneau, François, Lafrance, Guy and Piché, Claude, Montreal: Bellarmin, 2000, pp. 185–200; slightly revised version in Kant’s Political Theory: Interpretations and Applications, ed. Elisabeth Ellis. Pennsylvania State University Press, 2012.

‘Agents of Justice’, Metaphilosophy, 32 (2001), 180–95 and in Global Justice, ed. Pogge, Thomas W.. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001, pp. 188–203.

‘Practical Principles and Practical Judgement’, Hastings Center Report, 31 (2001), 15–23.CrossRef

‘Sidgwick on Practical Reason’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 109 (2001), 83–9.

‘Kant’s Conception of Public Reason’, in Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung, ed. Gerhardt, Volker, Horstmann, Rolf-Peter and Schumacher, Ralph (Akten des ix. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses), vol. i. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2001, pp. 35–47.CrossRef

‘Autonomy and the Fact of Reason in the Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, 30–41’, in Immanuel Kant, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, ed. Höffe, Otfried (Klassiker Auslegen Bd. 26). Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2002, pp. 81–97.CrossRef

‘Constructivism in Rawls and Kant’, in A Cambridge Companion to John Rawls, ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 347–67.

‘Autonomy: The Emperor’s New Clothes’, The Inaugural Address, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. vol. 77 (2003), 1–21.CrossRef

‘Constructivism vs. Contractualism’, Ratio, 16, no. 4 (December 2003), 319–31 and in On What We Owe Each Other, ed. Stratton-Lake, Philip. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004, pp. 17–31.

‘Kant: Rationality as Practical Reason’, in The Oxford Handbook of Rationality, ed. Mele, Alfred J. and Rawling, Piers. Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 93–109; trans. as ‘Kant: Racjonalność jako rozum praktyczny’, Prezgląd Filozoficzny, 13, no. 4 (2004), 125–45.

‘Consequences for Non-consequentialists’, Utilitas, 16 (2004), 1–11.CrossRef

‘Autonomy, Plurality and Public Reason’, in New Essays on the History of Autonomy, ed. Brender, Natalie and Krasnoff, Larry. Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 181–94.CrossRef

‘Modern Moral Philosophy and the Problem of Relevant Descriptions’, in Modern Moral Philosophy, ed. O’Hear, A., Royal Institute of Philosophy, suppl. vol. 54. Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 301–16.CrossRef

‘Self-Legislation, Autonomy and the Form of Law’, in Recht, Geschichte, Religion: Die Bedeutung Kants für die Gegenwart, ed. Nagl-Docekal, Herta und Langthaler, Rudolf, Sonderband der Deutschen Zeitschrift für Philosophie. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2004, pp. 13–26.CrossRef

**‘Kant’s Justice and Kantian Justice’, in Bounds of Justice, 65–80; trans. as ‘Kantische Gerechtigkeit und kantianische Gerechtigkeit’, in Kants Ethik, ed. Ameriks, Karl. Paderborn: Mentis Verlag, 2004, pp. 58–73.

‘The Dark Side of Human Rights’, International Affairs, 81, no. 2 (2005), 427–39.CrossRef

‘Experts, Practitioners and Practical Judgement’, Journal of Moral Philosophy, 4, no. 1 (2007), 153–66.

‘Normativity and Practical Judgement’, Journal of Moral Philosophy, 4, no. 3 (2007), 393–406.CrossRef

‘Historical Trends and Human Futures’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A, 39, no. 4 (December 2008), 529–34.CrossRef

‘Applied Ethics: Naturalism, Normativity and Public Policy’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 26 (2009), 1–12.

‘Rights, Obligations, Priorities’ (commentary on Nicholas Wolterstorff’s Justice: Rights and Wrongs)’, Studies in Christian Ethics, 23, no. 2 (May 2010), 163–71.

‘Orientation in Thinking: Geographical Problems, Political Solutions’, in Reading Kant’s Geography, ed. Elden, Stuart and Mendieta, Eduardo. New York: University of Stony Brook Press, 2011, pp. 215–32.