Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T05:07:42.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

5 - Rules on unfair trade

Peter Van den Bossche
Affiliation:
WTO Appellate Body, Geneva
Denise Prévost
Affiliation:
Maastricht University, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Introduction

WTO law provides for detailed rules with respect to dumping and subsidization – two specific trade practices commonly considered to be unfair. The following sections will briefly examine the WTO rules concerning these unfair trade practices.

Rules on dumping

The WTO rules on dumping are contained in Article VI of the GATT 1994 and in the Anti-Dumping Agreement.

‘Dumping’ is defined in Article 2.1 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement as bringing a product onto the market of another country at a price less than the ‘normal value’ of that product.

WTO law does not prohibit dumping. Since prices of products are usually set by private companies, not by governments, WTO law does not regulate dumping itself. Instead, it governs the actions of WTO Members in response to dumping. WTO Members are allowed to take measures to protect their domestic industry from the injurious effects of dumping. Pursuant to Article VI of the GATT 1994 and the Anti-Dumping Agreement, WTO Members are entitled to impose anti-dumping measures if three substantive conditions are met:

  • • there is dumping;

  • • the domestic industry producing the like product in the importing country is suffering material injury (or there is a threat of such material injury); and

  • • there is a causal link between the dumping and the injury.

  • These requirements have been worked out in detail in Articles 2 to 4 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement. The Anti-Dumping Agreement further provides rules concerning anti-dumping investigations and the imposition and collection of anti-dumping duties.

    WTO Members have frequent recourse to anti-dumping measures, and these measures are regularly the subject of trade disputes between WTO Members.

    More than three thousand anti-dumping measures have been imposed by WTO Members since the establishment of the WTO. Between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2014, the most frequent user of anti-dumping measures was India (534 measures), followed at a distance by the United States (345 measures), the European Union (298 measures) and Argentina (228 measures). This makes clear that the days when anti-dumping measures were almost exclusively used by developed-country Members are over. China has been by far the biggest target of anti-dumping measures (759 measures), followed by Korea (213 measures), Chinese Taipei (173 measures) and the United States (162 measures).

    Type
    Chapter
    Information
    Essentials of WTO Law
    , pp. 141 - 177
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press
    Print publication year: 2016

    Access options

    Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

    References

    Bown, P.C., and Mavroidis, C.P. (2013) ‘One (firm) is not enough: a legal–economic analysis of EC–Fasteners’, World Trade Review 12 243–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Dunoff, L.J., and Moore, O.M. (2014) ‘Footloose and duty-free? Reflections on European Union – Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Footwear from China’, World Trade Review 13 149–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Durling, J.P. (2003) ‘Deference, but only when due: WTO review of anti‐dumping measures’, Journal of International Economic Law 6 (1) 125–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Charnowitz, S., and Fischer, C. (2015) ‘Canada–Renewable Energy: implications for WTO law on green and not-so-green subsidies’, World Trade Review 14 177–210.Google Scholar
    Cosbey, A., and Mavroidis, C.P. (2014) ‘A turquoise mess: green subsidies, blue industrial policy and renewable energy: the case for redrafting the Subsidies Agreement of the WTO’, Journal of International Economic Law, 17 11–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Hahn, M., and Mehta, K. (2013) ‘It's a bird, it's a plane: some remarks on the Airbus Appellate Body report (EC and certain member States – Large Civil Aircraft, WT/DS316/AB/R)’, World Trade Review 12 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Pauwelyn, J. (2013) ‘Treaty interpretation or activism? Comment on the AB report on United States – ADs and CVDs on Certain Products from China’, World Trade Review 12 235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Prusa, J.T., and Vermulst, E. (2013) ‘United States – Definitive Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China: passing the buck on pass-through’, World Trade Review 12 197–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Rubini, L. (2012) ‘“wastin’ time no more”. Subsidies for renewable energy, the SCM Agreement, policy space and law reform’, Journal of International Economic Law 15(2) 525–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

    Save book to Kindle

    To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Dropbox

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Google Drive

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

    Available formats
    ×