Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T11:12:33.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - Vascular cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Fay Gilder
Affiliation:
Addenbrooke’s Hospital
Paul Hayes
Affiliation:
Addenbrooke’s Hospital
Jane Sturgess
Affiliation:
Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge
Justin Davies
Affiliation:
Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge
Kamen Valchanov
Affiliation:
Papworth Hospital, Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Of all elective surgical sub-specialties, vascular surgery is associated with the highest risk of death (5%). Because of the high incidence of co-morbidities (therefore increasing the baseline risk) among this patient group, patients must be carefully evaluated and informed of the risks and benefits. Although these patients do represent a high-risk group, the consequences of not undertaking an operation must also be considered. These consequences could include limb loss if bypass surgery is deferred, stroke when carotid endarterectomy is delayed and death from aortic rupture when aneurysms are not treated.

Pre-operative evaluation and preparation, intra- and post-operative care all play key roles in minimising risk to the patient. Vascular surgery can be approached through conventional open surgery or via a minimally invasive, endovascular route, and choosing the correct mode of intervention is key to a good result. Successful outcomes after vascular surgery are very much dependent on a multi-disciplinary team approach to care with the anaesthetist, surgeon and interventional radiologist (for endovascular procedures) all playing key roles.

Risk scoring

There are several well-validated guidelines and risk scores used to help inform the requirement for optimisation and to aid discussions with the patient about the risks and benefits of surgery.

The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC AHA) guidelines incorporate the risk associated with the surgical procedure with the risk associated with patient co-morbidity (Lee’s revised cardiac risk index, see Chapter 22) to guide both work-up and calculation of risk for each individual according to the proposed type of surgery. They are applied as follows:

  1. Does the patient need emergency surgery (e.g. ruptured aortic aneurysm)? If ‘yes’ go to theatre and plan for peri-operative and post-operative risk factor management. If ‘no’ proceed to step 2.

  2. Does the patient have any active cardiac conditions? (unstable coronary syndromes, severe valvular heart disease, decompensated cardiac failure, significant cardiac arrhythmias) – if ‘yes’ delay surgery for evaluation and treatment. If ‘no’ proceed to step 3.

  3. Does the patient have a good functional capacity (>4 METs – see below) without symptoms? If yes – proceed to surgery. If no or unknown – proceed to step 4.

  4. Does the patient have one or more clinical risk factors (history of – ischaemic heart disease, compensated or prior heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, co-existing diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency). If yes – consider non-invasive cardiac stress testing and requesting a cardiology opinion to define the patient’s cardiac status and peri-operative risk.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Devereaux, PJ, Yang, H, Guyatt, GH, et al. Rationale, design, and organization of the Peri-operative Ischemic Evaluation (POISE) trial: a randomized controlled trial of metoprolol versus placebo in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Am Heart J 2006; 152: 223–30.Google Scholar
GALA Trial Collaborative Group. General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2008; 372: 2132–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS. Guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease. Circulation 2011; 124: e54–e130.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×