Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Miscellaneous Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- 1 The Modern Prison Paradox
- 2 Politics and the Punitive Turn
- 3 Public Policy and the Creation of Community
- 4 The Culture and Consequence of Prison
- 5 The Social Effects of Incarceration
- 6 The Social Effects of Prison Work
- 7 From Individuals to Communities
- 8 The Road to Reform
- 9 Epilogue (Or: How I Went to Berkeley and Wound Up in Prison)
- Appendixes
- Notes
- Index
1 - The Modern Prison Paradox
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
- Frontmatter
- Miscellaneous Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- 1 The Modern Prison Paradox
- 2 Politics and the Punitive Turn
- 3 Public Policy and the Creation of Community
- 4 The Culture and Consequence of Prison
- 5 The Social Effects of Incarceration
- 6 The Social Effects of Prison Work
- 7 From Individuals to Communities
- 8 The Road to Reform
- 9 Epilogue (Or: How I Went to Berkeley and Wound Up in Prison)
- Appendixes
- Notes
- Index
Summary
The test of every religious, political, or educational system, is the man which it forms.
If a system injures the intelligence it is bad. If it injures the character it is vicious.
If it injures the conscience it is criminal.
Henri Frederic Amiel, Journal (June 17, 1852)In the early morning hours of Sunday, August 14, 1971, police cars in the small city of Palo Alto, California, were dispatched to the homes of 12 young men. Uniformed officers knocked on their doors and notified the men that they were being charged with armed robbery and burglary. They were read their rights, searched, handcuffed, and put in the back of a squad car. Each was taken to the police station, where he was summarily processed: photographed, fingerprinted, and led to a holding cell. These dozen men were then transferred to prison, where they were to be incarcerated together for 14 days under the watchful eye of the warden and a rotating cast of 12 young prison guards.
Thus began a landmark experiment that offered scholars a remarkable window on the socializing effects of prison. The experimental protocol was fairly straightforward. Twenty-four research subjects, all healthy and normal college-aged men, had been randomly assigned to play the part of either a prisoner or a prison guard. For two weeks, these men would live full time (in the case of the inmates) or work long shifts (in the case of the guards) in a simulated prison that had been carefully constructed in the basement of a building at Stanford University.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Modern Prison ParadoxPolitics, Punishment, and Social Community, pp. 1 - 23Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013