Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T23:35:40.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

b - Communities Inside and Outside the Corporation: Control, Power and Interests

from 8 - Corporation and Communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2017

James Faulconbridge
Affiliation:
Lancaster University Management School
Grietje Baars
Affiliation:
City University London
Andre Spicer
Affiliation:
City University London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter examines how critical analysis of communities inside and outside the corporation can provide valuable insights into the way communities emerge, are leveraged, are imbued with power and politics, and are used to serve the interests of different parties. The starting point for discussions is geographical and organization-studies literatures on corporate communities. In this work, one preoccupation is identifying how managers in corporations seek to construct communities (see, e.g., Amin and Cohendet, 2004; Faulconbridge, 2010). This work has been informed, in particular, by the communities-of-practice literature (Lave and Wenger, 1991; Wenger, 1998). A second preoccupation is analysing the various extra-firm communities that corporations participate in (see, e.g., Morgan, 2001; Bathelt et al., 2004; Maskell, 2014). The purpose here is to reveal the ways corporations define, exploit and contribute to communities outside of the organization's boundaries. The effects on institutions are afforded particular attention in this literature as part of efforts to understand how, through communities, corporations influence local and global governance regimes (see also Morgan, this volume; Sanchez, this volume).

In these literatures, the concept of the community is used in a variety of ways, from co-located workplace communities, to local host communities in a city or region, to transnational virtual communities. Whilst recognizing the limitations of such diverse conceptions, these literatures are useful because they reveal not only the centrality of, but also the sometimes insidious nature of, the communities created and leveraged by corporations. In particular, the chapter seeks to reveal the ways that communities are used by corporations as a means of control; power over communities without is used by corporations to allow goals to be achieved; and communities are used as means of protecting and promoting the interests of particular groups. The discussion thus reveals that critical analyses are crucial for bringing into view the multiple ways that communities can be used as a means of pursuing the interests of the capitalists driving corporations, this having potentially detrimental effects for workers and society. It is also noted, however, that communities might also be a means of resisting the control, power and interests of the corporation.

The rest of the chapter proceeds over four further sections. The next section considers how communities within the corporation have been studied, and the way these communities contribute to the innovative capacity and governance of corporations.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Corporation
A Critical, Multi-Disciplinary Handbook
, pp. 457 - 469
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackroyd, S., and Thompson, P., (1999) Organizational Misbehaviour (London: Sage).
Adler, P. S., Kwon, S. W., and Heckscher, C. (2008) ‘Professional work: the emergence of collaborative community’, Organization Science 19(2): 359–376.Google Scholar
Amin, A. (1999) ‘An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 23: 365–378.Google Scholar
Amin, A., and Cohendet, P. (2004) Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities and Communities (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Amin, A., and Roberts, J. (2008) ‘Knowing in action: beyond communities of practice’, Research policy 37: 353–369.Google Scholar
Arnold, P. (2005) ‘Disciplining domestic regulation: the World Trade Organization and the market for professional services’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 30(4): 299–330.Google Scholar
Asheim, B. (1996) ‘Industrial districts as “learning regions”: a condition for prosperity’, European Planning Studies 4: 379–405.Google Scholar
Barney, J. (1991) ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management 17: 99–120.Google Scholar
Barrientos, S., and Smith, S. (2007) ‘Do workers benefit from ethical trade? Assessing codes of labour practice in global production systems’, Third World Quarterly 28(4): 713–729.Google Scholar
Bartlett, C., and Ghoshal, S. (1998) Managing across Borders: The Transnational Solution. (London: Random House).
Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., and Maskell, P. (2004) ‘Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation’, Progress in Human Geography 28: 31–56.Google Scholar
Benner, C. (2003) ‘Learning communities in a learning region: the soft infrastructure of cross-firm learning networks in Silicon Valley’, Environment and Planning A 35: 1809–1830.Google Scholar
Boden, D., and Molotch, H. (1994) ‘The compulsion of proximity’, in Friedland, R. and Boden, D. (eds.), NowHere. Space, Time and Modernity (Berkeley: University of California Press), 257–286.
Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Boussebaa, M. (2009) ‘Struggling to organize across national borders: the case of global resource management in professional service firms’, Human Relations 62: 829–850.Google Scholar
Boyer, R. (2007) ‘Assessing the impact of fair value upon financial crises’, Socio-Economic Review 5: 779–807.Google Scholar
Brock, D. M., Powell, M. J., and Hinings, C. R. (1999) ‘The changing professional organization’, in Brock, D. M., Powell, M. J. and Hinings, C. R. (eds.), Restructuring the Professional Organization: Corporates, Cobwebs and Cowboys (London and New York: Routledge), 1–19.CrossRef
Brown, J. S., and Duguid, P. (1991) ‘Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation’, Organization Science 2: 40–57.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. L. (2007) ‘Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility’, Academy of management Review 32: 946–967.Google Scholar
Cohen, D., and Prusak, L. (2001) In good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press).
Cohendet, P., and Llerena, P. (2003) ‘Routines and incentives: the role of communities in the firm’, Industrial and Corporate Change 12: 271–297.Google Scholar
Colombo, M. G. (1998) ‘Some introductory reflections’, in Colombo, M. G. (ed.), The Changing Boundaries of the firm: Explaining Evolving Inter-Firm Relations (Routledge, London), 1–25.
Contu, A. (2014) ‘On boundaries and difference: communities of practice and power relations in creative work’, Management Learning 45: 289–316.Google Scholar
Contu, A., Palpacuer, F., and Balas, N. (2013) ‘Multinational corporations’ politics and resistance to plant shutdowns: a comparative case study in the south of France’, Human Relations 66(3): 363–384.Google Scholar
Cooper, D., Hinings, C. R., Greenwood, R., and Brown, J. L. (1996) ‘Sedimentation and transformation in organizational change: the case of Canadian law firms’, Organization Studies 17(4): 623–647.Google Scholar
Dicken, P. (2011) Global Shift, edn. (London: Sage).
Dicken, P., Kelly, P. F., Olds, K., and Yeung, H. W.-C. (2001) ‘Chains and network, territories and scales: towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy’, Global Networks 1(2): 89–112.Google Scholar
Djelic, M.-L., and Quack, S. (2003) ‘Theoretical building blocks for a research agenda linking globalization and institutions’, in Djelic, M. L. and Quack, S. (eds.), Globalization and Institutions: Redefining the Rules of the Economic Game (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), 15–34.CrossRef
Djelic, M.-L., and Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2006) ‘Introduction: a world of governance: the rise of transnational regulation’, in Djelic, M.-L. and Sahlin-Andersson, K. (eds.), Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1–30.
Duguid, P. (2008) ‘The art of knowing: social and tacit dimensions of and the limits of community of practice’. in Amin, A. and Roberts, J. (eds.), Community, Economic Creativity and Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 69–89.CrossRef
Empson, L., Cleaver, I., and Allen, J (2013) ‘Managing partners and management professionals: institutional work dyads in professional partnerships’, Journal of management studies 50: 808–844.Google Scholar
Engwall, M. (2003) ‘No project is an island: linking projects to history and context’, Research policy 32: 789–808.Google Scholar
Faulconbridge, J. R. (2006) ‘Stretching tacit knowledge beyond a local fix? Global spaces of learning in advertising professional service firms’, Journal of Economic Geography 6: 517–540.Google Scholar
Faulconbridge, J. R. (2007a) ‘London and New York's advertising and law clusters and their networks of learning: relational methodologies and scalar reflections’, Urban Studies 44: 1635–1656.Google Scholar
Faulconbridge, J. R. (2007b) ‘Relational spaces of knowledge production in transnational law firms’, Geoforum 38: 925–940.Google Scholar
Faulconbridge, J. R. (2008) ‘Negotiating cultures of work in transnational law firms’, Journal of Economic Geography 8: 497–517.Google Scholar
Faulconbridge, J. R. (2010) ‘Global architects: learning and innovation through communities and constellations of practice’, Environment and Planning A 42: 2842–2858.Google Scholar
Faulconbridge, J. R., Beaverstock, J. V., Derudder, B., and Witlox, F. (2009) ‘Corporate ecologies of business travel in professional service firms: working towards a research agenda’, European urban and regional studies 16: 295–308.Google Scholar
Faulconbridge, J. R., and Muzio, D. (2008) ‘Organizational professionalism in globalizing law firms’, Work, Employment and Society 22(1): 7–25.Google Scholar
Fleming, P., and Spicer, A. (2003) ‘Working at a cynical distance: implications for power, subjectivity and resistance’, Organization 10: 157–179.Google Scholar
Fox, S. (2000) ‘Communities of practice, Foucault and actor-network theory’, Journal of Management Studies 37: 853–866.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R., and Empson, L. (2003) ‘The professional partnership: relic or exemplary form of governance?’, Organization Studies 24: 909–933.Google Scholar
Halliday, T. C., and Carruthers, B. G. (2009) Bankrupt: Global Lawmaking and Systemic Financial Crisis (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
Henry, N., and Pinch, S. (2001) ‘Neo-Marshallian nodes, institutional thickness, and Britain's “Motor Sport Valley”: thick or thin?’, Environment and Planning A 33: 1169–1184.Google Scholar
Jones, A. (2008) ‘The rise of global work’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33: 12–26.Google Scholar
Klein, N. (2007) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of disaster Capitalism (New York: Metropolitan Books).
Kornberger, M., and Clegg, S. R. (2004) ‘Bringing space back in: organizing the generative building’, Organization Studies 25: 1095–1114.Google Scholar
Laurier, E. (2004) ‘Doing office work on the motorway’, Theory, Culture and Society 21: 261–277.Google Scholar
Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Lawyer, The (2007) ‘UK proves persuasive to India's liberalisation’, 7 March.
Lazega, E. (2001) The Collegial Phenomenon: The Social Mechanisms of Cooperation among Peers in a Corporate Law Partnership (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Lee, Y. S. (1999) ‘Labor shock and the diversity of transnational corporate strategy in export processing zones’, Growth and Change 30: 337–365.Google Scholar
Levy, D. L. (2008) ‘Political contestation in global production networks’, Academy of Management Review 33: 943–963.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. (1952 [1890]) Principles of Economics (London: Macmillan).
Maskell, P. (2014) ‘Accessing remote knowledge: the roles of trade fairs, pipelines, crowdsourcing and listening posts’, Journal of Economic Geography 14(5): 883–902.Google Scholar
Massey, D. (1995) Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
McGrath, S. (2013) ‘Fuelling global production networks with “slave labour”? Migrant sugar cane workers in the Brazilian ethanol GPN’, Geoforum 44: 32–43.Google Scholar
Miles, I. (2001) ‘Services innovation: a reconfiguring of innovation studies’, PREST Discussion Paper Series (Manchester: Manchester University Press), www.academia.edu/4126286/Services_Innovation_A_Reconfiguration_of_Innovation_Studies.
Millar, J., and Salt, J. (2008) ‘Portfolios of mobility: the movement of expertise in transnational corporations in two sectors-aerospace and extractive industries’, Global Networks 8: 25–50.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1979) The Structuring of Organizations (London: Prentice Hall).
Morgan, G. (2001) ‘Transnational communities and business systems’, Global Networks 1: 113–130.Google Scholar
Morgan, G. (2006) ‘Transnational actors, transnational institutions, transnational spaces: the role of law firms in the internationalization of competition regulation’, in Djelic, M.-L. and Sahlin-Andersson, K. (eds.), Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 139–160.
Muzio, D., and Ackroyd, S. (2005) ‘On the consequences of defensive professionalism: recent changes in the legal labour process’, Journal of Law and Society 32: 615–642.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).
Orr, J. (1996) Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
Porter, M. (1998) On Competition (Boston: Harvard Business School Press).
Roberts, J. (2006) ‘Limits to communities of practice’, Journal of Management Studies 43: 623–639.Google Scholar
Seabrooke, L. (2014) ‘Epistemic arbitrage: transnational professional knowledge in action’, Journal of Professions and Organization 1: 49–64.Google Scholar
Segal-Horn, S., and Dean, A. (2009) ‘Delivering “effortless experience” across borders: managing internal consistency in professional service firms’, Journal of World Business 44(1): 41–50.Google Scholar
Skyrme, D. (2007) Knowledge Networking: Creating the Collaborative Enterprise (London: Routledge).
Strengers, Y. (2014) ‘Meeting in the global workplace: air travel, telepresence and the body’, Mobilities: 1–17.
Suddaby, R., Cooper, D. J., and Greenwood, R. (2007) ‘Transnational regulation of professional services: governance dynamics of field level organizational change’, Accounting Organizations and Society 32: 333–362.Google Scholar
von Hippel, E. (2005) Democratizing Innovation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning Meaning and Identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., and Snyder, W. (2002) Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge (Boston: Harvard Business School Press).
Williamson, O. E. (1979) ‘Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations’, Journal of Law and Economics 22: 233–261.Google Scholar
Yeung, H. W. (2009) ‘Situating regional development in the competitive dynamics of global production networks: an East Asian perspective’, Regional Studies 43: 325–351.Google Scholar
Zietsma, C., and Lawrence, T. B. (2010) ‘Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: the interplay of boundary work and practice work’, Administrative Science Quarterly 55(2): 189–221.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×