Yuki, Tanaka, McCormack, Tim L. H., and Gerry, Simpson, eds., Beyond Victor’s Justice? The Tokyo War Crimes Trial Revisited, International Humanitarian Law Series (Leiden, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 2010)Google Scholar

John, Toland, The Rising Sun: The Decline and Fall of the Japanese Empire, 1936–1945 (New York, NY: Random House, 1970)Google Scholar

John, Costello, The Pacific War: 1941–1945 (New York, NY: Rawson, Wade, 1981)Google Scholar

Ronald, Specter, Eagle against the Sun: The American War with Japan (New York, NY: Free Press, 1985)Google Scholar

Hopkins, William B., The Pacific War: The Strategy, Politics, and Players That Won the War (Minneapolis, MN: Zenith Press, 2008)Google Scholar

“Bureaucracy, Justice, and Collective Responsibility in the World War II War Crimes Trials,” Rechtshistorisches Journal [The journal of legal history]18 (1999), pp. 313–42

“Military Justice from WWII to Guantanamo: Fair Trials, Judicial Murder, and International Standards in WWII Crimes Trials in Asia,” in Summa Dieter Simon zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Rainer Maria Kiesow, Regina Ogorek, and Spiros Simitis (Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Vittorio Klostermann, 2005), pp. 59–80

“The Singapore War Crimes Trials and Their Relevance Today,” Singapore Law Review 31 (2013), pp. 1–38

“Weibo zhanzhenzui panjue caoan: Dongjing shenpan panjue de lingyi shijiao” [An alternative Tokyo Judgment: The Draft Webb Judgment on war crimes], in 2013 Dongjing shenpan xueshu taolunhui lunji [The compilation of essays from the symposium on the Tokyo Trial] (Shanghai, China: Shanghai jiaotong daxue chubanshe, in press)

“The Historiography of the Historical Foundations of Theories of Responsibility in International Criminal Law,” in Historical Origins of International Criminal Law, Vol. 1, ed. Bergsmo, Morten, Ling, Cheah Wui, and Ping, Yi (New York, NY: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, in press)

“Japanese Instrument of Surrender,” in Documents on the Tokyo International Military Tribunal: Charter, Indictment and Judgments, ed. Boister, Neil and Cryer, Robert (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 3.

“Potsdam Declaration (Proclamation Defining Terms for Japanese Surrender, 26 July, 1945),” in Boister and Cryer, Documents on the Tokyo International Military Tribunal, pp. 1–2

Yuma, Totani, The Tokyo War Crimes Trial: The Pursuit of Justice in the Wake of World War II (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2008), pp. 69–77Google Scholar

Tōkyō saiban handobukku henshū iinkai [The Tokyo Trial Handbook Compilation Committee], ed., Tōkyō saiban handobukku [The Tokyo Trial handbook] (Tokyo: Aoki shoten, 1989), pp. 76–8Google Scholar

Hōmu daijin kanbō shihō hōsei chōsabu [The Judiciary and Legislation Investigation Bureau, Secretariat of the Ministry of Legal Affairs], ed., Sensō hanzai saiban gaishiyō [A concise historical overview of war crimes trials] (August 1973), Hōmu-Hei-11-4B-23-6334, National Archives of Japan, p. 266

Tōkyō saiban handobukku henshū iinkai, Tōkyō saiban handobukku, pp. 219–24

Piccigallo, Philip R., The Japanese on Trial: Allied War Crimes Operations in the East, 1945–1951 (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1979), pp. 263–5Google Scholar

Hayashi, Hirofumi, BC-kyū senpan saiban [Class BC war crimes trials] (Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 2005), pp. 61–2Google Scholar

Hayashi, , BC-kyū senpan saiban, pp. 62–3.

Yokohama, bengoshikai [Yokohama Bar Association], Hōtei no seijōki: BC-kyū senpan Yokohama saiban no kiroku [The Stars and Stripes in the courtroom: Records of Class BC war crimes trials at Yokohama] (Tokyo: Nihon hyōronsha, 2004)Google Scholar

Hayashi, Hirofumi, Sabakareta sensō hanzai: Igirisu no tai-Nichi senpan saiban [War crimes tried: The British war crimes trials against the Japanese] (Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 1998)Google Scholar

The Australian War Crimes Trials Law Reports Series, 1945–51

Narrelle, Morris and McCormack, Timothy L. H., and a supplementary thematic volume, Australia’s War Crimes Trials, 1945–51 (in press), edited by Georgina Fitzpatrick, Timothy L. H. McCormack, and Narrelle Morris.

Nagai, Hitoshi, Firipin to tai-Nichi senpan saiban, 1945–1953 [The Philippines and war crimes trials against the Japanese, 1945–1953] (Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 2010)Google Scholar

Nagai, Hitoshi, Firipin BC-kyū senpan saiban [Philippine Class BC war crimes trials] (Tokyo: Kōdansha, 2013)Google Scholar

Sharon, Chamberlain, “Justice and Reconciliation: Postwar Philippine Trials of Japanese War Criminals in History and Memory,” PhD diss., George Washington University, 2010.Google Scholar

Kushner, Barak, Men to Devils and Devils to Men: Japanese War Crimes and Chinese Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Materials on the Trial of Former Servicemen of the Japanese Army Charged with Manufacturing and Employing Bacteriological Weapons (Moscow: Foreign Language Publishing House, 1950). For discussion of the Soviet initiative to put the Japanese emperor on trial, see Totani, Tokyo War Crimes Trial, pp. 59–id62

Zenkoku ken’yūkai rengōkai hensan iinkai, Nihon kenpei seishi, pp. 1284–9

Iwakawa, Kotō no tsuchi to narutomo, pp. 541–70

Toyoda, Masayuki, “Chūka jinmin kyōwakoku no senpan saiban” [War crimes trials by the People’s Republic of China], two installments, Kikan sensō sekinin kenkyū [The report on Japan’s war responsibility] 17 (Fall 1997), pp. 67–73; 18 (Winter 1997), pp. 46–53.Google Scholar

The program had a tremendous impact on the accused's understanding of personal guilt and, after repatriation, they came to take the lead in educating the Japanese public about Japanese military violence during the Sino-Japanese armed conflict (1937–1945)

“Netherlands Law Concerning Trials of War Criminals,” in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, ed. United Nations War Crimes Commission, vol. 11 (London, UK: His Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1949), pp. 86–110

“Chinese Law Concerning Trials of War Criminals,” in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, vol. 14 (1949), pp. 152–60

“French Law Concerning Trials of War Criminals by Military Tribunals and by Military Government Courts in the French Zone of Germany,” in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, vol. 3 (1948), pp. 93–102

Paragraph 5, “Royal Warrant: Regulations for the Trial of War Criminals (A.O. 81/ 1945),” in Sensō hanzai saiban kankei hōreishū, Hōmu daijin kanbō shihō hōsei chōsabu, vol. 1, p. 89.

“Australian Law Concerning Trials of War Criminals by Military Courts,” in United Nations War Crimes Commission, Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, vol. 5 (1948), pp. 94–101.

Article 2, “Regulations Governing the Trial of War Criminals” (September 24, 1945), in BC-kyū Beigun Manira saiban shiryō [Sources on American military Class BC war crimes trials at Manila], ed. Chaen Yoshio (Tokyo: Fuji shuppan, 1986), p. 124

“Regulations Governing the Trials of Accused War Criminals” (December 5, 1945), in “History of Nonmilitary Activities of the Occupation of Japan: Trials of Class ‘B’ and ‘C’ War Criminals,” in SCAP Monograph Drafts, 1945–1951, p. 215.Google Scholar

“United States Law and Practice Concerning Trials of War Criminals by Military Commissions, Military Government Courts and Military Tribunals,” in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, vol. 3 (1948), pp. 103–20

Articles 2 and 6, “Regulations Governing the Trial of War Criminals” (January 21, 1946), pp. 82–6

article 2, “United States Pacific Fleet Commander Marianas” (April 5, 1946), p. 98

“Executive Order No. 68: Establishing a National War Crimes Office and Prescribing Rules and Regulations Governing the Trial of Accused War Criminals,” in BC-kyū senpan Firipin saiban shiryō [Sources on Philippine Class BC war crimes trials], ed. Chaen Yoshio (Tokyo: Fuji shuppan, 1987), pp. 149–56.

Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, vol. 2, The Belsen Trial (1947); Raymond Philips

Yamashita saiban (The Yamashita Trial), trans. Shimojima, Muraji, 2 vols. (Tokyo: Nihon kyōbunsha, 1952)

“Exhibit 376: Letter by President Manuel L. Quezon to Jose Abad Santos, Sr. (March 17, 1942),” Honma Trial, R1865

Hunt, Ray C. and Bernard, Norling, Behind Japanese Lines: An American Guerrilla in the Philippines (Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 1986)Google Scholar

Robert, Lapham and Bernard, Norling, Guerrillas in the Philippines, 1942–1945 (Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 1996)Google Scholar

Bernard, Norling, The Intrepid Guerrillas of North Luzon (Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 1999).

Fukukawa, , Nihon rikugun shōkan jiten, p. 237.

Greg, Bradsher, ed., Japanese War Crimes and Related Topics: A Guide to Records at the National Archives (College Park, MD: NARA, n.d.)

Greg, Bradsher, et al., Researching Japanese War Crimes Records: Introductory Essays (Washington, DC: NARA for the Nazi War Crimes and Japanese Imperial Government Records Interagency Working Group, 2006). It is also available online, Google Scholar

Fukukawa, , Nihon riku-kaigun jinmei jiten, p. 37.

Mitchell, Richard H., Janus-Faced Justice: Political Criminals in Imperial Japan (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Shinichi, Tsuchiya and Minoru, Shikita, Crime and Criminal Policy in Japan from 1922–1988: Analysis and Evaluation of the Shōwa Era (Tokyo: Japan Criminal Policy Society, 1990)Google Scholar

Tsuchiya, Shinichi, Shōwa no keiji seisaku [Criminal policy in the Shōwa period].

Excerpts from the Collection of Laws and Regulations Concerning Prisoners of Wars – Ordinance concerning POW Camps (Dec. 23, 1941, Imperial Ordinance No. 1182),” Kuroda Trial, R2065

Chaen, Yoshio, ed., Furyo ni kansuru shohōki ruijū (Jūgonen sensō gokuhi shiryōshū, 11) [The compilation of various rules concerning prisoners of war (Secret sources of the Fifteen-Year War, vol. 11)] (Tokyo: Fuji shuppan, 1988), pp. 17–8.Google Scholar

Boister, and Cryer, , Documents on the Tokyo International Military Tribunal, pp. 102, 104

Boister, and Cryer, , Documents on the Tokyo International Military Tribunal, p. 106

Boister, and Cryer, , Documents on the Tokyo International Military Tribunal, p. 578

Chamberlain, , Justice and Reconciliation, pp. 113–17.

Beatrice, Trefalt, “Hostages to International Relations? The Repatriation of Japanese War Criminals from the Philippines,” Japanese Studies, vol. 31, no. 2 (September 2011): pp. 191–209Google Scholar

Tsuji, Yutaka, Montenrupa: Hitō yūshū no kiroku [Muntinlupa: Records of imprisonment in the Philippines] (Tokyo: Asahi shinbunsha, 1952), pp. 19–25Google Scholar

Camilo, Osias, The Story of a Long Career of Varied Tasks (Quezon City, Philippines: Manlapaz, 1971)Google Scholar

David Joel, Steinberg, Philippine Collaboration in World War II (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1962)Google Scholar

Richard Harding, Davis et al., The Russo-Japanese War: A Photographic and Descriptive Review of the Great Conflict in the Far East (New York, NY: P. F. Collier & Son, 1905), p. 101Google Scholar

Phillip, Knightley, The First Casualty: From the Crimea to Vietnam: The War Correspondent as Hero, Propagandist, and Myth Maker (New York, NY and London, UK: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1975)Google Scholar

Katayama, Yoshitaka, Nichi-Ro sensō to shinbun: “sekai no naka no Nihon” o dō ronjitaka [The Russo-Japanese War and newspapers: How was “Japan in the world” debated?] (Tokyo: Kōdansha, 2009)Google Scholar

Hirama, Yōichi, Nichi-Ro sensō o sekai wa dō hōjitaka [How did the world report on the Russo-Japanese War?] (Tokyo: Fuyō shobō shuppan, 2010)Google Scholar

Inoue, Yūko, Nisshin, Nichi-Ro sensō to shashin hōdō [The Sino-Japanese War, the Russo-Japanese War, and photojournalism] (Tokyo: Yoshikawa kōbunkan, 2012)Google Scholar

Utsumi, Aiko, Nihongun no horyo seisaku [Prisoner-of-war policies of the Japanese military] (Tokyo: Aoki shoten, 2005), pp. 72–124Google Scholar

Fukiura, Tadamasa, Horyotachi no Nichi-Ro sensō [The Russo-Japanese War from the perspective of prisoners of war] (Tokyo: Nihon hōsō shuppan kyōkai, 2005)Google Scholar

Ōkuma, Hideji, Nichi-Ro sensō no uragawa “daini no kaikoku”: Nihon rettō ni jōrikushita Roshiagun horyo shichiman-nin [“The second opening of the country” behind the scenes of the Russo-Japanese War: 70,000 Russian prisoners of war who landed on the Japanese archipelago] (Tokyo: Sairyūsha, 2011)Google Scholar

Miyawaki, Noboru, Roshia-hei horyo ga aruita Matsuyama: Nichi-Ro sensō ka no kokusai kōryū [The city of Matsuyama in which the Russian prisoners of war walked: International exchange during the Russo-Japanese War] (Matsuyama: Ehime shinbunsha, 2005)Google Scholar

Van, Waterford, Prisoners of the Japanese in World War II: Statistical History, Personal Narratives and Memorials Concerning POWs in Camps and on Hellships, Civilian Internees, Asian Slave Laborers and Others Captured in the Pacific Theater (Jefferson, NC, and London, UK: McFarland, 1994)Google Scholar

Gavan, Daws, Prisoners of the Japanese: POWs of World War II in the Pacific (New York, NY: William Morrow, 1994)Google Scholar

Tachikawa Kyōichi, “Kyūgun ni okeru horyo no toriatsukai: Taiheiyō sensō no jōkyō o chūshin ni” [Treatment of prisoners of war by the former army: Centering on the circumstances of the Pacific War], Bōei kenkyūjo kiyō [Bulletin of the National Institute for Defense Studies] 10, no. 1 (September, 2007): p. 89

Totani, , Tokyo War Crimes Trial

Boister, and Cryer, , Documents on the Tokyo International Military Tribunal, pp. 304–5.

Kyokutō kokusai gunji saiban sokkiroku [Transcripts of court proceedings at the International Military Tribunal for the Far East], vol. 10 (Tokyo: Yūshūdō shoten, 1968), p. 766.

“Exhibit 12: Laws, Rules, and Regulations Pertaining to Prisoners of War – Ordinance of Prisoner of War Units (Imperial Ordinance No. 1182, December 23, 1941),” p. 5, Tamura Trial, R85.

Exhibit 12, p. 6 (‘Regulations for the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Army Ministry Notification No. 22, December 14, 1904, as amended by the Army Ministry Notification No. 167, 1904; No. 7, 1905; No. 31, 1914; Army Ministry Notification, HQs, 30 and 57, 1943’), Tamura Trial.

Chaen, Furyo ni kansuru shohōki ruijū, p. 19. The date of issuance of Notification No. 22 in the original version in Japanese appears as February 14, 1904

“Exhibit 9: Affidavit of Yotsumoto Masanori (June 4, 1948,” p. 1, R62

“Exhibit 60: Instructions of War Minister Hideki Tojo to the Newly-Appointed Commanders of the Prisoner of War Camps (July 7, 1942),” Tamura Trial, R222

“Exhibit 61: Instructions of War Minister Hideki Tojo Following his Visit to Zentsuji (May 30, 1943),” Tamura Trial, R224

“Rimpei Kato, Okikatsu Arao, Goro Isoya, Choho Mononobe, Hiroshi Nukata, Bunro Saheki, Mitsuo Tomita, Yahei Toyama, Tadakatsu Wakamatsu,” entry UD 1321, RG 331, SCAP, Records of the SCAP Legal Section, Prosecution Division: US vs. Japanese War Criminal Case Files, 1945–1949, Boxes 1637–8, NARA, College Park, MD

Wui Ling, Cheah, “Post-World War II British ‘Hell-Ship’ Trials in Singapore: Omissions and the Attribution of Responsibility,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 8 (2010), pp. 1035–58.Google Scholar

Rekishigaku, kenkyūkai [History Research Association], ed., Taiheiyō sensōshi: 4. Taiheiyō sensō, 1. 1940–1942 [The history of the Pacific War: Vol. 4. The Pacific War, 1. 1940–1942], pp. 44–9

Bōei kenshūjo senshishitsu, ed., Senshi sōsho: 5. Biruma kōryakusen [War history series: Vol. 5. The invasion of Burma] (Tokyo: Asagumo shinbunsha, 1967).Google Scholar

British medical officers (dated November 23, 1945), Terauchi was “suffering from advanced arteriosclerosis with cerebral degeneration.”

“in full possession of his faculties and carrying out all his duties up to April 10th 1945,”

He came to have great difficulty understanding reports made to him since around November 18, 1945, onwards. “Examination of Field Marshal TERAUCHI on November 23rd 1945,”

Herbert, Bix, Hirohito and the Making of Modern Japan (New York, NY: HarperCollins, 2002)Google Scholar

Senpan saiban no kenkyū: senpan saiban seisaku no keisei kara Tōkyō saiban, BC-kyū saiban made [A study of war crimes trials: From the formation of policies on war crimes trials to the Tokyo Trial and Class BC war crimes trials], (Tokyo: Bensei shuppan, 2010), pp. 260, 277

Bōei kenshūjo senshishitsu, ed., Senshi sōsho: 84. Minami Taiheiyō rikugun sakusen. (5) Aitape, Puriaka, Rabauru [War history series: vol. 84. The army strategy in the South Pacific. (5) Aitape, Puriaka, Rabaul] (Tokyo: Asagumo shinbunsha, 1975), pp. 11–225.

Bōei kenshūjo senshishitsu, ed., Senshi sōsho: Minami Taiheiyō rikugun sakusen. (5) Aitape, Puriaka, Rabauru, pp. 451–4. Senshi sōsho indicates that the Imperial General Headquarters sanctioned the “MO” Operation on Adachi’s insistence, despite awareness of its inadvisability.

Lord, Wright, “War Crimes under International Law,” The Law Quarterly Review, vol. 62, no. 1 (January 1946), p. 45.Google Scholar

Jalloh, Charles C. and Amy, DiBella, “Equality of Arms in International Criminal Law: Continuing Challenges,” in The Ashgate Research Companion to International Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives, ed. William A. Schabas, Yvonne McDermott, and Niamh Hayes (Farnham, Surrey, England, and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2013), pp. 251–88.

Sweeting, A. J., “O’Brien, John William Alexander (1908–1980),” in Australian Dictionary of Biography (National Centre of Biography, Australian National University), accessed July 2, 2013, .Google Scholar

“Exhibit E: Fleet Ordinance (November 30, 1914),” Toyoda Trial, R1194

Naikaku, insatsukyoku [The Cabinet Printing Office], ed., Taishō nenkan hōrei zensho. Taishō 3-nen, 4. gunrei, seirei, ritsuryō, kakurei, shōrei [The Taishō-era compendium of laws. Taishō 3, vol. 4. military laws, regulations, legal codes, cabinet ordinances, ministerial ordinances] (Tokyo: Hara shobō, 1986), pp. 75–82Google Scholar

Kaigun daijin kanbō [The Secretariat of the Navy Ministry], ed., Kaigun seido enkaku, kan-3 (ge-kansei) [The history of the navy system, vol. 3 (part 2. organization)] (Tokyo: Kaigun daijin kanbō insatsu, 1939), pp. 1452–5.Google Scholar

“Exhibit F: Regarding the Administrative Competence of the Combined Fleet. Secretariat No. 3567 (November 24, 1924),”Toyoda Trial, R1195

Bōei kenshūjo senshishitsu, ed., Senshi sōsho. 102. Riku-kaigun nenpyō fu heiki, hyōgo no kaisetsu [War history series: The army and navy chronology, with an appendix containing the annotation on weaponry and military terms] (Tokyo: Asagumo shinbunsha, 1980), pp. 460–535.Google Scholar

“Exhibit CV: Naval Districts Ordinance. Military Ordinance pertaining to the Navy No. 5 (August 23, 1923),” p. 1, Toyoda Trial, R3475.

“Exhibit BP: Naval General Staff Ordinance. Military Ordinance Pertaining to the Navy No. 5 (September 27, 1933),”Toyoda Trial, R2027

Sugamo isho hensan iinkai [The Sugamo Committee for the Compilation of Wills], ed., Seiki no isho [The Will of the century] (Tokyo: Sugamo isho hensan iinkai kankō jimusho, 1953)

Sumitani, Osachi, Utsumi, Aiko, and Akazawa, Shirō, eds., “Tōkyō saiban, BC-kyū sensō hanzai, sensō sekinin kankei shiyō bunken mokuroku” [Index to published sources concerning the Tokyo Trial, Class BC war crimes, and war responsibility], Shisō, no. 719 (May 1985), 28 pages.

Mitchell, Janus-Faced Justice. For a thematic analysis of criminal justice in the Shōwa era (1926–1989)

The book apparently met a cool reception, however, as few Japanese in those years were prepared to support an agenda in conflict with the Allied war crimes policy and more specifically the Treaty of Peace with Japan (September 8, 1951).

Riron, henshūbu [Theory Editor Section], ed., Kabe atsuki heya: BC-kyū senpan no jinseiki [A room with thick walls: Life stories of Class BC war criminals] (Tokyo: Nihon tosho sentā, 1992; originally published in 1953).

Dean, Aszkielowicz, “Repatriation and the Limits of Resolve: Japanese War Criminals in Australian Custody,” Japanese Studies, vol. 31, no. 2 (September 2011), pp. 211–28Google Scholar

Robert, Cribb, “Avoiding Clemency: The Trial and Transfer of Japanese War Criminals in Indonesia, 1946–1949,” Japanese Studies, vol. 31, no. 2 (September 2011), pp. 151–70Google Scholar

Beatrice, Trefalt, “A Peace Worth Having: Delayed Repatriations and Domestic Debate Over the San Francisco Peace Treaty,” Japanese Studies, vol. 27, no. 2 (September 2007), pp. 173–87Google Scholar

Sandra, Wilson, “After the Trials: Class B and C Japanese War Criminals and the Post-War World,” Japanese Studies, vol. 31, no. 2 (September 2011), pp. 141–9Google Scholar

Sandra, Wilson, “Prisoners in Sugamo and Their Campaign for Release, 1952–1953,” Japanese Studies, vol. 31, no. 2 (September 2011), pp. 191–90Google Scholar

Toyoda, , Sensō saiban yoroku, p. 460.

Chaen, Yoshio, ed., Nihon BC-kyū senpan shiryō [Japanese sources on Class BC war crimes trials] (Tokyo: Fuji shuppan, 1983)

BC-kyū senpan Beigun Shanhai tō saiban shiryō [Sources on American military Class BC war crimes trials at Shanghai etc.] (Tokyo: Fuji shuppan, 1989)

BC-kyū senpan Chūgoku Futsukoku saiban shiryō [Sources on Chinese and French Class BC war crimes trials] (Tokyo: Fuji shuppan, 1992)

BC-kyū senpan Eigun saiban shiryō [Sources on British military Class BC war crimes trials] (Tokyo: Fuji shuppan, 1988)

BC-kyū senpan Gōgun Manusu tō saiban shiryō [Sources on Australian Class BC war crimes trials at Manus etc.] (Tokyo: Fuji shuppan, 1991)

BC-kyū senpan Waran saiban shiryō zenkan tsūran [Sources on Dutch Class BC war crimes trials and an overview of all volumes] (Tokyo: Fuji shuppan, 1992)

BC-kyū senpan gunji hōtei shiryō Kanton hen [Sources on Class BC military war crimes trials at Guangdong] (Tokyo, Fuji shuppan, 1984)

BC-kyū senpan Yokohama saiban shiryō [Sources on Class BC war crimes trials at Yokohama] (Tokyo: Fuji shuppan, 1985)

Handō, Kazutoshi, “BC-kyū saiban” o yomu [Reading the “Class BC trials”] (Tokyo: Nihon keizai shinbun shuppansha, 2010), p. 33.Google Scholar

Tōkyō saiban handobukku henshū iinkai, Tōkyō saiban handobukku, pp. 146–7.

Visit

Kamisaka, Fuyuko, Seitai kaibō: kyūshū daigaku igakubu jiken [Vivisection: The case of the Medical Department at Kyūshū University] (Tokyo: Mainichi shinbunsha, 1979)Google Scholar

Sugamo Purizun 13-gō teppi [The iron doors at Sugamo Prison No. 13] (Tokyo: Shinchōsha, 1981)

Sugamo: senpan kōshukei [Sugamo: Death by hanging of a war criminal] (Tokyo: Mineruva shobō, 1981)

Nokosareta tsuma: Yokohama saiban BC-kyū senpan hiroku [Wives left behind: Secret records of the Yokohama Class BC war criminals] (Tokyo: Chūō kōronsha, 1983)

Kai ni natta otoko: Naoetsu horyo shūyōjo jiken [A man who became a seashell: The case of the Naoetsu Prisoner-of-War Internment Camp] (Tokyo: Bungei shunjū, 1986)

Kimura, , Wasurerareta sensō sekinin

Nagano, Tameyoshi, Rabauru gunji hōtei: aru Nihonjin no saiban kiroku [The Rabaul military court: Trial records of a Japanese] (Tokyo: Keisō shuppan sābisu sentā, 1982)Google Scholar