Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Part I Fundamental concepts and sources
- Part II Human dignity as a constitutional value
- Part III Human dignity as a constitutional right
- Part IV Human dignity in comparative law
- 11 Human dignity in American constitutional law
- 12 Human dignity in Canadian constitutional law
- 13 Human dignity in German constitutional law
- 14 Human dignity in South African constitutional law
- 15 Human dignity in Israeli constitutional law
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
14 - Human dignity in South African constitutional law
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2015
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Part I Fundamental concepts and sources
- Part II Human dignity as a constitutional value
- Part III Human dignity as a constitutional right
- Part IV Human dignity in comparative law
- 11 Human dignity in American constitutional law
- 12 Human dignity in Canadian constitutional law
- 13 Human dignity in German constitutional law
- 14 Human dignity in South African constitutional law
- 15 Human dignity in Israeli constitutional law
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
The provisions of section 10 of the South African Constitution
Section 10 of the Constitution of South Africa determines that human dignity is a constitutional right. It states:
Human Dignity
Everyone has inherent dignity and the right to have their dignity respected and protected.
Extensive judgments have interpreted this provision. Legal literature has studied the constitutional right and constitutional value of human dignity. It appears that Woolman is correct in stating that the South African jurisprudence regarding human dignity is the most developed, following that of the Constitutional Court of Germany. I should add that next to the German literature, the South African legal literature regarding its provision on human dignity is the most developed.
Human dignity in the Constitution of South Africa is characterized by four normative traits. First, human dignity is a relative right. Second, human dignity is not an eternal right; it can be amended. Third, human dignity is a supreme value, but is not the only supreme value. Fourth, the constitutional right to human dignity covers acts and omissions that at times overlap other constitutional rights, but it also covers acts and omissions that fall in its exclusive domain and are not included within the scope of other rights. I shall discuss each of these four traits in turn.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Human DignityThe Constitutional Value and the Constitutional Right, pp. 243 - 279Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
, ‘Dignity’, in , and (eds.), Constitutional Law of South Africa, 2nd edn, Revision Series 4 (Cape Town: Juta, 2012) chapter 36, p. 1Google Scholar
, ‘Human Dignity in Constitutional Law in South Africa’, in European Commission for Democracy through Law, The Principle of Respect for Human Dignity (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1999)Google Scholar
, ‘Human Dignity as a Foundational Value of Our Constitutional Order’ (2000) 16 South African Journal on Human Rights193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Dignity’, in , and (eds.), South African Constitutional Law: The Bill of Rights (Durban: Butterworths, 2002)Google Scholar
, ‘Human Dignity as a Constitutional Value’, in and (eds.), The Concept of Human Dignity in Human Rights Discourse (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002), 133Google Scholar
, ‘Equality, Dignity and the Politics of Interpretation’ (2004) 19 South African Public Law724Google Scholar
’, Lecture Before Stellenbosch Law Faculty (August 15, 2005); , ‘The Value of Human Dignity in Interpreting Socio-Economic Rights’ (2005) 21 South African Journal on Human Rights1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and their Limitations, Doron Kalir trans. (Cambridge University Press, 2012) 32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Limitations’, in , and (eds.), Constitutional Law of South Africa, 2nd edn, Revision Series 4 (Cape Town: Juta, 2012)Google Scholar
and , ‘Human Dignity’, in , and (eds.), Constitutional Law of South Africa, 2nd edn, Revision Series 4 (Cape Town: Juta, 2012) chapter 12, p. 17Google Scholar
, ‘Human Dignity as a Constitutional Value: A South African Perspective’, in , and (eds.), Recht, Staat, Gemeinwohl: Festschrift für Dietrich Rauschning (Munich: Heymann 2001)Google Scholar
, ‘The Legal Nature of the South African Constitutional Revolution’ (2004) 4 New Zealand Law Review633Google Scholar
, ‘Nonconstitutional Amendments’ (2009) 22 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment – The Migration and Success of a Constitutional Idea’ (2013) 61 American Journal of Comparative Law657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Amendability of Fundamental Rights: Golaknath and the Proposed Constitutional Amendment’ (1969) 33 Supreme Court Cases Journal42Google Scholar
, ‘Phantom of Basic Structure of the Constitution: A Critical Appraisal of the Kesavananda Case’ (1974) 16 Journal of Indian Law Institute243Google Scholar
, ‘The Constitutional Quicksands of Kesavananda Bharati and the Twenty Fifth Amendment’ (1974) 1 Supreme Court Cases Journal45Google Scholar
, ‘Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerata: Who Wins?’ (1974) 1 Supreme Court Cases Journal3Google Scholar
, ‘Constitutional Amendments and the “Basic Structure” Doctrine’, in (ed.), Democracy, Human Rights and the Rule of Law: Essays in Honour of Nani Palkhivala (New Delhi: Butterworths India, 2000) 90Google Scholar
, Democracy and Constitutionalism in India: A Study of the Basic Structure Doctrine (Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
, ‘The Indian “Essential Features” Case’ (1981) 30 International and Comparative Law Quarterly307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Guardians of the Constitution: Unconstitutional Constitutional Norms’ (1999) 4 Journal of Civil Liberties48Google Scholar
, ‘Judicial Role in Constitutional Amendments in India: The Basic Structure Doctrine’, in (ed.), The Creation and Amendment of Constitutional Norms (British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2000) 195Google Scholar
, ‘An Unconstitutional Constitution? A Comparative Perspective’ (2006) 4 International Journal of Constitutional Law460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.), Constitutional Law of South Africa, 2nd edn, Revision Series 4 (Cape Town: Juta, 2012)
, ‘Human Dignity – Our Supreme Constitutional Value’ (2001) 4 Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal1Google Scholar
, and (eds.), Constitutional Law of South Africa, 2nd edn, Revision Series 4 (Cape Town: Juta, 2012)
and , ‘Freedom and Security of the Person’, in , and (eds.), Constitutional Law of South Africa, 2nd edn, Revision Series 4 (Cape Town: Juta, 2012)Google Scholar
, and , The New Constitutional and Administrative Law (Landsdowne: Juta, 2001) vol. I, 362Google Scholar
, Socio-Economic Rights: Adjudication under a Transformative Constitution (Claremont: Juta, 2010)Google Scholar
, ‘Can “Dignity” Guide South Africa’s Equality Jurisprudence?’ (2001) 17 South African Journal on Human Rights34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Equality and Non-Discrimination: Some Analytical Thoughts’ (2006) 22 South African Journal on Human Rights597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Soul of Dignity: A Reply to Stu Woolman’, in and (eds.) Constitutional Conversations (Cape Town: Pretoria University Law Press, 2008) 217Google Scholar
, ‘Bridging the Span toward Justice: Laurie Ackermann and the Ongoing Architectonic of Dignity Jurisprudence’ (2008) Acta Juridica18Google Scholar
, ‘Interpretation’, in , and (eds.), Constitutional Law of South Africa, 2nd edn, Revision Series 4 (Cape Town: Juta, 2nd 2012)Google Scholar
, ‘The Corporation and Basic-Law: Human Dignity and Liberty’ (2012) 8 Mazney Mishpat49Google Scholar
, ‘The Role of Dignity in Equality Law: Lessons from Canada and South Africa’ (2008) 6 International Journal of Constitutional Law267CrossRefGoogle Scholar