Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T11:12:26.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Expressing, Showing and Representing

from Part I - Philosophical Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Mitchell Green
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Catharine Abell
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Joel Smith
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access

Summary

Expression as Genitive or Generic

Various forms of expressive behaviour are best seen as solutions to the problem of how to make our psychological states and processes known to others. In some cases, natural selection appears to have solved this problem by making our psychological states perceptible to conspecifics. In others we indicate those states in ways that, while not enabling perception thereof, still put appropriately situated others in a position to discern what state of mind we are in. True to their origins in the Latin concept exprimere (meaning to press out), many of the most significant modern practices of expression require those engaging in them to put something of themselves on the table: at least to express one's state of mind, one must be in that state, be it remorse, concern, resentment or certainty about the future. In this way, expression differs from the blander but more labile notion of representation.

Let us set aside semantic expression, such as occurs when an indicative sentence expresses a proposition or a predicate expresses a concept. Within the remainder of the phenomenon of expression, we may differentiate between self-expression and expressiveness. An account of self-expression explains what it is to express one's own psychological state. By contrast, an account of expressiveness tells us what it is for an agent to engage in expressive behaviour even when she is not expressing her own state of mind or feeling; such an account also tells us how an inanimate object may have an affective dimension such as exuberance or melancholy. (We describe some paintings as exuberant and even speak of wind as melancholy.) Non-semantic expression encompasses both self-expression and expressiveness.

Green's Self-Expression (2007) does not offer a general account of non-semantic expression, but rather offers only accounts of self-expression and of certain forms of expressiveness. Yet the work has the resources to provide an account of non-semantic expression per se. (I restrict the theory to non-semantic cases because it would take us too far afield to offer an account of what it is for words, phrases and sentences to express propositions and other kinds of content.) Accordingly, a general account of non-semantic expression is as follows: A expresses psychological state B just in case A either expresses her B (expresses a psychological state that is her own), or A engages in behaviour or possesses features that are expressive of B.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Expression of Emotion
Philosophical, Psychological and Legal Perspectives
, pp. 25 - 45
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bar-On, D. 2004. Speaking My Mind: Expression and Self-Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon.
Bar-On, D. 2010. ‘Expressing as “Showing What's Within”: Critical Notice of Mitchell Green's Self-Expression’, Philosophical Books 51: 212–227.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. 2006. ‘Are Emotions Natural Kinds?’, Perspectives on Psychological Science 1: 28–58.Google Scholar
Barwell, I. 1986. ‘How Does Art Express Emotion?’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 45: 175–181.Google Scholar
Camp, E. 2013. ‘Slurring Perspectives’, Analytic Philosophy 54: 330–349.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. 1992. ‘Are There Basic Emotions?Psychological Review 99: 550–553.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. 2008. ‘Direct Perception in the Intersubjective Context’, Consciousness and Cognition 17: 535–543.Google Scholar
Green, M. 1997. ‘On the Autonomy of Linguistic Meaning’, Mind 106: 217–244.Google Scholar
Green, M. 2007. Self-Expression. Oxford: Clarendon.
Green, M. 2008. ‘Empathy, Expression and What Artworks Have to Teach’, in Hagberg, (ed.) Art and Ethical Criticism. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 95–122.
Green, M. 2009. ‘Speech Acts, the Handicap Principle, and the Expression of Psychological States’, Mind & Language 24: 139–163.Google Scholar
Green, M. 2010. ‘Perceiving Emotions’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary 84: 45–61.Google Scholar
Green, M. 2011. ‘How to Express Yourself: Refinements and Elaborations on the Central Ideas of Self-Expression’, Protosociology.
Green, M. 2013. ‘Assertions’, in Sbisà, and Turner, (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics, Vol. II: Pragmatics of Speech Actions. Berlin: De Gruyter-Mouton, pp. 387–410.
Green, M. 2014. ‘Speech Acts’, in E. Zalta (ed.) Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Summer 2015 Edition).
Green, M. in press a. ‘Imagery, Expression, and Metaphor’, Philosophical Studies.
Green, M. in press b. ‘A Refinement and Defence of the Force/Content Distinction’, in Harris, Fogal and Moss, (eds.) New Work on Speech Acts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Griffiths, P. 1998. What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hatfield, G. 2002. ‘Perception as Unconscious Inference’, in Heyer, and Mausfield, (eds.) Perception and the Physical World: Psychological and Philosophical Issues in Perception. New York: Wiley, pp. 115–143.
Hom, C. 2008. ‘The Semantics of Racial Epithets’, Journal of Philosophy 105: 416–440.Google Scholar
Jacob, P. 2011. ‘The Direct Perception Model of Empathy: A Critique’, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2: 519–540.Google Scholar
Jeshion, R. 2013. ‘Expressivism and the Offensiveness of Slurs’, Philosophical Perspectives 27: 308–335.Google Scholar
Kivy, P. 2002. Introduction to a Philosophy of Music. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Krueger, J. 2012. ‘Seeing Mind in Action’, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11: 149–173.Google Scholar
Maan, M. and Cummings, M. 2012. ‘Poison Frog Colors Are Honest Signals of Toxicity, Particularly for Bird Predators’, American Naturalist 179: E1–E14.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. and Harper, D. 2003. Animal Signals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
O'Shea, J. 2012. ‘The Theory of Mind and the Aim of Sellars’ Original Myth of Jones’, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11: 175–204.Google Scholar
Potts, C. 2007. ‘The Expressive Dimension’, Theoretical Linguistics 33: 165–198.Google Scholar
Richard, M. 2008. When Truth Gives Out. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, R. 1988. ‘What an Emotion Is: A Sketch’, Philosophical Review 97: 183–209.Google Scholar
Russell, J. and Fernández-Dols, J. 1997. ‘What Does a Facial Expression Mean?’, in Russell, and Fernández-Dols, (eds.) The Psychology of Facial Expression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–30.
Russell, J. and Fernández-Dols, J. 1980. ‘A Circumplex Model of Affect’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 1161–1178.Google Scholar
Smith, B. 2009. ‘Speech Sounds and the Direct Meeting of Minds’, in Nudds, and O'Callaghan, (eds.) Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 183–210.
Smith, J. 2015. ‘The Phenomenology of Face-to-Face Mindreading’, Nous 90: 274–292.Google Scholar
Stout, R. 2010. ‘Seeing the Anger in Someone's Face’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary 84: 29–43.Google Scholar
Topál, J., Gergely, G., Erdőhegyi, A., Csibra, G. and Miklósi, A. 2009. ‘Differential Sensitivity to Human Communication in Dogs, Wolves, and Human Infants’, Science 325: 1269–1272.Google Scholar
Weiskrantz, L. 2009. Blindsight: A Case Study Spanning 35 Years, and New Developments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×