Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-10T13:10:22.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Microclimatic Elements

from Part I - Controls of Microclimate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

Roger G. Barry
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Peter D. Blanken
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Get access

Summary

In this chapter we discuss the basic characteristics of the major climatic elements – temperature, moisture in the air and soil, wind, and carbon dioxide – in both a global and a microclimatological context. We also consider the processes of photosynthesis, respiration and carbon exchange, and the nitrogen cycle. Finally, pollutants and aerosols are discussed. This provides a basic introduction to the elements that are used in characterizing micro- and local climates.

Temperature

Air Temperature

Temperature is a measure of the kinetic energy of an object. Air temperatures have traditionally been measured by mercury or alcohol in glass thermometers at a height of 1.5–2.0 m above ground in a louvered box known as a Stevenson screen or weather shelter (to prevent solar heating). Air temperatures at the Earth's surface generally range between about –50 °C and +50 °C. The coldest locations, outside the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, are in northeastern Siberia in winter, and the hottest ones are in the subtropical deserts of North Africa and the Arabian Peninsula in summer.

At meteorological stations, readings are typically made every six hours (00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC, Coordinated Universal Time), but at climatological stations there may be only readings of the daily maximum and minimum temperatures. Temperature measurements are widely made around the world (more than 20,000 stations) and in Europe there are data going back more than 300 years. Most instrumental records begin around 1850.

As well as the dry-bulb temperature reading, a wet-bulb is operated: the thermometer bulb is wrapped in a muslin bag that is kept wet. The depression of the wet-bulb reading with respect to the dry-bulb is used to determine the dew point temperature and relative humidity. This instrument, known as a psychrometer, is described in Chapter 3, Section H.

The true daily mean temperature is obtained as the arithmetic mean of 24 hourly readings, but often the average of the daily maximum and minimum temperatures using a “max-min thermometer” is used since this requires a reading only once per 24 hours. This gives a biased value, however, often negative in winter and positive in summer, with a higher standard deviation. Variables of interest include the daily and monthly mean values, the absolute monthly maxima and minima, and derived indices such as frequency distributions and freezing and thawing indices.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambrose, S.M. and Sterling, S.M. 2014. Global patterns of annual actual evapotranspiration with land-cover type: knowledge gained from a new observation-based database. Hydrol. Earth System Sci., Discuss., 11: 12, 103–135.Google Scholar
Assouline, S., and Tessier, D. 2010. A conceptual model of the soil water retention curve. Water Resources Res. 34(2), 223–1.Google Scholar
Barry, R. G. 1978. Diurnal effects on topoclimate on an equatorial mountain. Arbeiten Zentralanstalt f.Meteorologie Geodynamik (Vienna), Publ. 32(72): 1–8.Google Scholar
Barry, R. G., and Chorley, R. J. 2010. Atmosphere, weather and climate, 9th ed. London: Routledge.
Batjes, N. H. 1996. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur. Soil Sci. 47: 151–63,Google Scholar
Becker, E. J. 2009. The frequency distribution of daily precipitation over the United States. Ph.D. dissertation. College Park: University of Maryland.
Blanken, P. D. 2009. Design of a living snow fence for snow drift control. Arctic Antarct., Alp. Res. 41(4): 418–25.Google Scholar
Blanken, P. D. 2014. The effect of winter drought on evaporation from a high-elevation wetland. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci.119–1369.Google Scholar
Blanken, P. D. 2015. Canopy Processes. In North, Gerald R. (editor in chief), Pyle, John and Zhang, Fuqing (editors), Encyclopedia of atmospheric sciences, 2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 244–255.
Blanken, P. D., and Rouse, W. R. 1996. Evidence of water conservation mechanisms in several subarctic wetland species. J. Appl. Ecol. 33(4): 842–50.Google Scholar
Bridgham, S. D. et al. 2006. The carbon balance of the North American wetlands. Wetlands 26L, 889–916.Google Scholar
Brooks, F. A. 1959. An introduction to physical microclimatology. Syllabus No. 397. Davis: University of California.
Brooks, F. A. et al. 1963. Investigation of energy and mass transfers near the ground including the influences of the soil-plant-atmosphere system. Davis: Department of Agricultural Engineering and Department of Irrigation, University of California. Contract DA- 36-039-SC-80334 U.S. Army Electronic Proving Ground Fort Huachuca, AZ.
Brunt, D. 1953. Bases of microclimatology. Nature 171: 322–3.Google Scholar
Buck, A. L. 1981. New equations for computing vapor pressure and enhancement factor. J. Appl. Meteorl. 20, 1527–32.Google Scholar
Chen, S-T. et al. 2014. Global annual soil respiration in relation to climate, soil properties and vegetation characteristics: Summary of available data. Agric. For. Met. 198–9: 335–48.Google Scholar
Cintineo, J. L. et al. 2012. An objective high-resolution hail climatology of the contiguous United States. Weath. Forecasting 27: 1235–48.Google Scholar
Damos, P., and Savopoulou-Soultani, M. 2012. Temperature-driven models for insect development and vital thermal requirements. Psyche 2012, Article ID 123405.Google Scholar
Fassnacht, S. R., and Deems, J. S. 2006. Measurement sampling and scaling for deep montane snow depth data. Hydrol. Proc. 20: 829–38.Google Scholar
Galloway, J. N. et al. 2004. Nitrogen cycles: Past, present, and futureBiogeochem. 7-0:153–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimeno, L. et al. 2014. Atmospheric rivers: A mini review. Frontiers Earth Science 2: 2. doi: 10.3389/feart.2014.00002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, J. P. et al. 2001. Snow depth manipulation and its influence on soil frost and water dynamics in a northern hardwood forest. Biogeochem. 56(2): 151–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitman, J. L. et al. 2008. Sensible heat observations reveal soil-water evaporation dynamics. J. Hydrometeor 9: 165–71.Google Scholar
Homén, T. 1893. Bodenphysikalische und meteorologische Beobachtungen mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Nachtfrostphänomens. Finlands Natur och Folk 53–4: 187–415.Google Scholar
Homén, T. 1897. Der tägliche Wärmeumsatz im Boden und die Wärmestrahlung zwischen Himmel und Erde. Acta Soc. Sci. Fenn. 23(2): 1–147.Google Scholar
Husak, G. J., Michaelsen, G., and Funk, C. 2007. Use of the gamma distribution to represent monthly rainfall in Africa, for drought monitoring applications. Int. J. Climatol. 27: 935–44.Google Scholar
Jasechko, S. et al. 2013. Terrestrial water fluxes dominated by transpiration. Nature 496: 347–5Google Scholar
Jones, P. D. et al. 1999. Surface air temperzture and its changes over the past 150 years. Rev. Geophys. 37: 173–99.Google Scholar
Karl, T. R. 1986. The sensitivity of the Palmer Drought Severity Index and Palmer's Z-Index to their calibration coefficients including potential evapotranspiration. J. Climate Appl. Met. 25: 77–86.Google Scholar
Karl, T. R. et al. 1983. Statewide average climatic history. Hist. Clim. Series 6.1. Asheville, NC: National Climate Data Center.Google Scholar
Katata, G. 2014. Fogwater deposition modeling for terrestrial ecosystems: A review of developments and measurements. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 119. doi:10.1002/2014JD02166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, J. F., Blanken, P. D., and Williams, M. W. 2015. Soil respiration variability across a soil moisture and vegetation community gradient within a snow-scoured alpine meadow. Biogeochemistry. doi: 10.1007/s10533-015-0122-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, K. J. 1959. Temperature and heat balance of soil. Oikos 10:103–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, B. E., Ryan, M. G., and Anthoni, P. M. 1999. Seasonal and annual respiration of a ponderosa pine ecosystem. Global Change Biol. 5: 169–82.Google Scholar
Lloyd, J., and Taylor, J. A. 1994. On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Functional Ecol. 8: 315–23.Google Scholar
Magnus, G. 1844. Versuche über die Spannkrafte des Wasserdampfes. Ann. Phys. Chem. (Poggendorff) 61, 225.Google Scholar
McDowell, N. G., White, S., and Pockman, W. T. 2008. Transpiration and stomatal conductance across a steep climate gradient in the southern Rocky Mountains. Ecohydrol. 1: 193–204. doi: 10.1002/eco.20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, W. C. 1814. An essay on dew. London: Taylor & Hessay.
Monteith, J. L. 1973. Principles of environmental physics. Sevenoaks, UK. E. Arnold.
Monteith, J. L., and Szeicz, G. 1962. Radiative temperature in the heat balance of natural surfaces. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 88: 496–507.Google Scholar
Moss, D. N. 1965. Capture of radiant energy in plants. In Waggoner, P. E.(ed.), Agricultural meteorology. Met. Monogr. 6(28). Boston: American Meteorological Society, pp. 90–108.
Neiman, P. J. et al. 2008. Meteorological characteristics and overland precipitation impacts of atmospheric rivers affecting the West Coast of North America based on eight years of SSM/I satellite observations. J. Hydromet. 9: 22–47.Google Scholar
Newell, R. E. et al. 1992, Tropospheric rivers? A pilot study. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19: 2401–4.Google Scholar
Palmer, W.C. 1965. Meteorological drought. Weather Bureau Res. Paper, no. 45. Washington, DC. Dept. of Commerce.
Parkes, J. 1845. On the influence of water on the temperature of soils. Roy. Agr. Soc. Eng. J. 5: 119–46.Google Scholar
Paulhus, J. L. H. 1965. Indian Ocean and Taiwan rainfall set new records. Mon. Wea. Rev., 93(5): 331–35.Google Scholar
Ralph, F. M., Neiman, P. J., and Wick, G. A. 2004: Satellite and CALJET aircraft observations of atmospheric rivers over the eastern north Pacific Ocean during the winter of 1997/98. MWR 132: 1721–45.Google Scholar
Ransom, W. H. 1963. Solar radiation and temperature. Weather 18: 18–23.Google Scholar
Senaviratne, S. I. et al. 2010. Investigating soil moisture – climate interactions in a changing climate: A review. Earth-Sci. Rev. 99: 125–61.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. W., Chiang, H. D., and Goldstein, R. J. 1982. A study of the incoming long wave atmospheric radiation from a clear sky, J. Appl. Met. 21: 566–78.Google Scholar
Ruimy, A. et al. 1995. CO2 fluxes over plant canopies and solar radiation: A review. Adv. Ecol. Res. 26: 1–68.Google Scholar
Slinn, W. G. N. 1982. Predictions for particle deposition to vegetative canopies. Atmos. Environ. 16, 1785–94.Google Scholar
Shook, K., and Gray, D. M. 1996. Small-scale spatial structure of shallow snowcovers. Hydrol. Proc. 10: 283–92.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. J. 1922. Temperature of soil and air in a desert. MWR 50: 142–4.Google Scholar
Tarnocai, C. et al. 2009. Carbon pools in the northern circumpolar permafrost region. Global Biogeochem. Cycles: 23: GB003327.Google Scholar
Trenberth, K. E. and Fasullo, J. T. 2012. Atmospheric moisture transport from ocean to land in reanalyses. GEWEX News, World Climate Research Programme. 22(1): 8–10.Google Scholar
Waliser, D. E. et al. 2012. The year of tropical convection (May 2008–April 2010): climate variability and weather highlights. Bull. Amer. Met. Soc. 93: 1189–1218.Google Scholar
Wang, L-X., Good, S. P., and Caylor, K. K. 2014. Global synthesis of vegetation control on evapotranspiration partitioning. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41: 6753–7.Google Scholar
Warren, J. M., Meinzer, F. C., Brooks, R., Domec, J-C., and Coulombe, R. 2007. Hydraulic redistribution of soil water in two old-growth coniferous forests: Quantifying patterns and controls. New Phytologist 173: 753–65.Google Scholar
Wells, W. C. 1814. An essay on dew. London: Taylor & Hessay.
Whitmarsh, J. 2009. The photosynthetic process. In Singhal, G. S. et al. (eds.), Concepts in photobiology: Photosynthesis and photomorphogenesis. New Delhi: Narosa and Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. pp. 11–51.
Zimov, S. A. et al. 2006. Permafrost and the global carbon budget. Science 313: 1612–13.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×