Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T11:30:13.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Judicial Institutional Change and Court Communication Innovations: The Case of the UK Supreme Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2017

Leslie J. Moran
Affiliation:
University of London
Richard Davis
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Utah
David Taras
Affiliation:
Mount Royal University
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The UK Supreme Court (UKSC) opened on 1 October 2009 making it one of the world's newest Supreme Courts. It came into being under the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. In part the dynamic shaping the new institution was continuity. The new court took over the roles and responsibilities of the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords. The committee's role as the final court of appeal for all UK civil cases, and criminal cases from England, Wales and Northern Ireland transferred to the new court. Access to the new court would continue to be controlled via a permission to apply procedure. Appeals would continue to be limited to points of law of legal and constitutional importance. The judges, commonly known as Law Lords, who made up the Appellate Committee became the first ‘Justices’ of the UKSC. The senior Law Lord, Baron Phillips of Worth Matravers, became the UKSC's first President. Change was also an important driver behind the 2005 Act in general and the provisions establishing the UKSC in particular. A central goal of these reforms is the clearer separation of powers between the judiciary and the other branches of state. Its impact upon the UKSC is captured in a comment made in the court's first Business Plan (2009):

The court's creation marks the visible separation of the United Kingdom's highest court from the legislature. It is designed both to increase the transparency of the judicial process and to help clarify the relationship between the Judiciary, Government and Parliament. (1)

In part the visibility and clarity of the court's position within the state was been realized through the court's physical location. Located in Parliament Square it is close to other buildings housing key state institutions, but physically separate from them. Commenting on the court's new location Lord Hope, the first Deputy President of the UKSC explained the move from a committee room in Parliament to a dedicated building of its own in the following terms, ‘Public perception is everything’ (Hope 2010, 6). A different form of ‘public perception’ was a matter addressed during the House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution (2007) investigation into the impact of the new separation of powers landscape introduced by the 2005 Act. Discussion focused on the importance of communication in general and media coverage in particular.

Type
Chapter
Information
Justices and Journalists
The Global Perspective
, pp. 255 - 280
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. 2010. “Supreme Court Rules in Favour of Pre-Nuptial Agreement.” BBC News, 20 October 2010. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11580907.Accessed23August2015.
Berlins, Marcel. 2009. “Loss of Court Reporters Is a Blow to Open Justice.” Guardian, 7 December 2009. www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/dec/06/berlins-writ-large-court-reporters.Accessed23August2015.
Blom-Cooper, Louis, Dickson, Brice, and Drewry, Gavin. 2009. The Judicial House of Lords 1876–2009. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Steve, Chibnall. 1977. Law and Order News: An Analysis of Crime Reporting in the British Press. London: Tavistock.
Communications Office UKSC. 2013. “Court on Camera: Judgment Summaries on Demand.” News release. 21 January 2013. Reference number 04/2013. https://www.supremecourt.uk/news/court-on-camera.html.
Communications Office UKSC. 2015. “Catch-up on court action: Supreme Court launches ‘video on demand’ service.” News release. 5 May 2015. Reference 03/2015. https://www.supremecourt.uk/news/catch-up-on-court-action-supreme-court-launches-video-on-demand-service.html. Accessed 23 August 2015.
Cornes, Richard. 2013. “A Constitutional Disaster in the Making? The Communications Challenge Facing the United Kingdom's Supreme Court.” Public Law, April, 266–291.
Coulter, Carol. 2012. Transcript of an interview with Carol Coulter legal affairs correspondent and editor Irish Times 2007–2012. 12 June. Interviewer: Leslie J. Moran. Copy on file with the author.
Curran, Gerry. 2012. Transcript of an interview with Gerry Curran, Media Relations Advisor, Court Service Ireland. 11 June. Interviewer: Leslie J. Moran. Copy on file with the author.
Ericson, Richard V. 1996. “Why Law Is Like News.” In Law as Communication, ed. Nelken, D., 195–230. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
Fishman, Mark. 1980. Manufacturing the News. Austin: University of TexasPress.
Gammell, Caroline. 2010. “Pre-Nuptial Agreements Recognised as German Heiress Wins Fight to Keep Fortune.” Daily Telegraph, 20 October. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/8075978/Pre-nuptial-agreements-recognised-as-German-heiress-wins-fight-to-keep-fortune.html. Accessed 23 August 2015.
William, Haltom. 1998. Reporting on the Courts: How the Mass Media Cover Judicial Actions. Chicago: Nelson Hall.
David, Hope. 2010. “Do We Really Need a Supreme Court? Newcastle Law School – 25 November 2010.” https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech_101125.pdf.
David, Hope. 2011. Transcript of an interview with Lord Hope of Craighead, Deputy President UK Supreme Court. 13 December. Interviewer: Leslie J. Moran. Copy on file with the author.
House of Lord Select Committee on the Constitution. 2006–2007. Minutes of Evidence. www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldselect/ldconst/151/15102.htm. Accessed 23 August 2015.
Jewkes, Yvonne. 2011. Media and Crime. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
Judge, Igor. 2005. Broadcasting Justice. London: Judiciary of England and Wales and Tribunal Judiciary. www.judiciary.gov.uk/media/speeches/2005/broadcasting-justice. Accessed 23 August 2015.
Lee, James, ed. 2011. From House of Lords to Supreme Court: Judges, Jurists and the Process of Judging. Oxford: Hart.
Lewis, Sian. 2009. Transcript of an interview with Sian Lewis, Head of Communications UK Supreme Court. 24 November. Interviewer: Leslie J. Moran. Copy on file with the author.
Miele, Chris, ed. 2010. The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom: History, Art, Architecture. London: Merrell.
Moran, Leslie J. 2012. “Every Picture Speaks a Thousand Words: Visualising Judicial Authority in the Press.” In Intersections of Law and Culture, ed. Gisler, Priska, Borella, Sara Steinert, and Wiedmer, Caroline, 31–49. London: Palgrave.
Leslie J., Moran 2014a. “Mass-Mediated ‘Open Justice’: Court and Judicial Reports in the Press in England and Wales.” Legal Studies 34, no. 1: 143–166.Google Scholar
Moran, Leslie J. 2014b. “Managing the ‘Critical Independencies’ of the Media and Judiciary in the United Kingdom: A Study of the Emergence of ‘Judicial Communications’ Media Initiatives.” In Law and Popular Culture: International Perspectives, ed. Asimow, Michael, Brown, Kathryn, and Papke, David, 195–218. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Moran, Leslie J. 2014c. “Managing the News Image of the Judiciary: The Role of Judicial Press Officers.” Oñati Socio-legal Series 4, no. 4: 799–818. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2506601. Accessed 23 August 2015.Google Scholar
Leslie, Moran , J. 2016. “Visible Justice: YouTube and the UK Supreme Court.” Annual Review of Interdisciplinary Justice Research 5, no. 1: 223–263.Google Scholar
Paterson, Alan. 2013. Last Judgment: The Last Law Lords and the Supreme Court. Oxford: Hart.
Rowe, Jenny. 2015. “Chief Executive's Review of the Process Followed by Selection Commissions Making Recommendations for Appointment to the Supreme Court.” https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/review-of-selection-commission-process-july-2015.pdf. Accessed 27 August 2015.
Rozenberg, Joshua. 2012. “The Media and the UK Supreme Court.” Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 1, no. 2: 44–46.Google Scholar
Supreme Court. 2009. The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom Business Plan 1 October 2009 – 31 March 2010. London: UK Supreme Court.
Supreme Court. 2010. Annual Report and Accounts 2009–2010. London: UK Supreme Court.
Supreme Court. 2011. Annual Report and Accounts 2010–2011. London: UK Supreme Court.
Supreme Court. 2012a. Annual Report and Accounts 2011–12. London: UK Supreme Court.
Supreme Court. 2012b. The Supreme Court Of The United Kingdom Business Plan 1 April 2012 – 31 March 2013, London: UK Supreme Court.
Supreme Court. 2013. Annual Report and Accounts 2012–13. London: UK Supreme Court.
Supreme Court. 2014. Annual Report and Accounts 2013–14. London: UK Supreme Court.
Supreme Court. 2015. Annual Report and Accounts 2014–15. London: UK Supreme Court.
Supreme Court. 2016. Annual Report and Accounts 2015–16. London: UK Supreme Court.
Supreme Court. N.d. Broadcasting Proceedings for the Supreme Court – Policy and Rules. London: UK Supreme Court.
Thompson, John B. 2000. Political Scandal: Power and Visibility in the Media Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Wilson, Ben. 2013. Transcript of an interview with Ben Wilson, Chief of Communications UK Supreme Court and AV technicians ‘Jason’ and ‘Andy.’ 16 May. Interviewers: Barbara Villez and Leslie J. Moran. Copy on file with the author.
Wilson, Ben. 2015. Email from Ben Wilson. 2 September. Copy on file with the author.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×