Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T06:17:50.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ordinal analysis without proofs

from PART I - PROOF THEORETIC ANALYSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2017

Wilfried Sieg
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania
Richard Sommer
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Carolyn Talcott
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Abstract. An approach to ordinal analysis is presented which is finitary, but highlights the semantic content of the theories under consideration, rather than the syntactic structure of their proofs. In this paper the methods are applied to the analysis of theories extending Peano arithmetic with transfinite induction and transfinite arithmetic hierarchies.

Introduction. As the name implies, in the field of proof theory one tends to focus on proofs. Nowhere is this emphasis more evident than in the field of ordinal analysis, where one typically designs procedures for “unwinding” derivations in appropriate deductive systems. One might wonder, however, if this emphasis is really necessary; after all, the results of an ordinal analysis describe a relationship between a system of ordinal notations and a theory, and it is natural to think of the latter as the set of semantic consequences of some axioms. From this point of view, it may seem disappointing that we have to choose a specific deductive system before we can begin the ordinal analysis.

In fact, Hilbert's epsilon substitution method, historically the first attempt at finding a finitary consistency proof for arithmetic, has a more semantic character. With this method one uses so-called epsilon terms to reduce arithmetic to a quantifier-free calculus, and then one looks for a procedure that assigns numerical values to any finite set of closed terms, in a manner consistent with the axioms. The first ordinal analysis of arithmetic using epsilon terms is due to Ackermann [1]; for further developments see, for example, [20].

More recently, investigations of nonstandard models of arithmetic due to Paris and Kirby have given rise to another approach, which incorporates Ketonen and Solovay's finitary combinatorial notion of an α-large set of natural numbers. Roughly speaking, to show that the proof-theoretic ordinal of a theory T is bounded by α, one uses an α-large interval in a nonstandard model of arithmetic to construct a model of T. These methods are surveyed and extended in [3, 4]; some of the constructions found in the second paper are derived from modeltheoretic methods due to Friedman [12, 13]. Sommer [28] has shown that one can avoid references to nonstandard models and instead view the methods as providing a way of building “finite approximations” to models of arithmetic, an idea which traces its way back to Herbrand [18].

Type
Chapter
Information
Reflections on the Foundations of Mathematics
Essays in Honor of Solomon Feferman
, pp. 1 - 36
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Wilhelm, Ackermann, Zur Widerspruchsfreiheit der Zahlentheorie, Mathematische Annalen, vol. 93 (1940), pp. 1-36.Google Scholar
[2] Jeremy, Avigad, An ordinal analysis of admissible set theory using recursion on ordinal notations, to appear in the Journal of Mathematical Logic.
[3] Jeremy, Avigad and Richard, Sommer, A model-theoretic approach to ordinal analysis, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 3 (1997), pp. 17-52.Google Scholar
[4] Jeremy, Avigad and Richard, Sommer, The model-theoretic ordinal analysis of predicative theories, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 64 (1999), pp. 327-349.Google Scholar
[5] Arnold, Beckmann, Separating fragments of bounded arithmetic, Ph.D. thesis, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, 1996.
[6] Lev Beklemishev, Proof-theoretic analysis by iterated reflection, to appear in the Archive for Mathematical Logic.
[7] Samuel, Buss, The witness function method and provably recursive functions of Peano arithmetic, Proceedings of the ninth international congress on logic, methodology, and philosophy of science, Uppsala, Sweden, 1991(D., Westerstahl D., Prawitz, B., Skyrms, editor), Elsevier North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 29-68.
[8] Samuel, Buss, First-order proof theory of arithmetic, in Buss [9].
[9] Samuel, Buss (editor), The handbook of proof theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1998.
[10] Timothy, Carlson, Ranked partial structures, preprint.
[11] Harvey, Friedman and Michael, Sheard, Elementary descent recursion and proof theory, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 71 (1995), pp. 1-45.Google Scholar
[12] Harvey, Friedman, Iterated inductive definitions and Σ12 -AC, Intuitionism and proof theory (A., Kino, J., Myhill, and R. E., Vesley, editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1970, pp. 435-442.Google Scholar
[13] Harvey, Friedman, Kenneth, McAloon, and Stephen, Simpson, A finite combinatorial principle which is equivalent to the 1-consistency of predicative analysis, Patras Logic Symposion (G., Metakides, editor), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982, pp. 197-230.
[14] Gerhard, Gentzen, Untersuchungenüber das logische Schliessen, Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 39 (1935), pp. 176-210. 405-431, translated as “Investigations into Logical Deduction” in [16], pages 68-131.Google Scholar
[15] Gerhard, Gentzen, Neue Fassung des Widerspruchsfreiheit für die reine Zahlentheorie, Forschungen zur Logik und zur Grundlegung der exaktenWissenschaften, New Series 4 (1938), pp. 19-44. translated as “New Version of the Consistency Proof for Elementary Number Theory” in [16], pages 252-286.Google Scholar
[16] Gerhard, Gentzen, Collected works, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969, Edited by M. E., Szabo.
[17] Petr, Hájek and Pavel, Pudlák, Metamathematics of first-order arithmetic, Springer, Berlin, 1993.
[18] Jacques, Herbrand, Recherches sur la théorie de la démonstration, Ph.D. thesis, University of Paris, 1930, English translation in [19].
[19] Jacques, Herbrand, Collected works, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1971, Warren Goldfarb, editor.
[20] Grigori, Mints and Sergei, Tupailo, Epsilon subsitution method for the ramified language and Δ11 -comprehension rule, Logic and foundations of mathematics (Andrea, Cantini et al., editor), Kluwer, the Netherlands, 1999, pp. 107-130.
[21] Wolfram, Pohlers, Proof theory: An introduction, Lecture Notes in Mathematics #1407, Springer, Berlin, 1989.
[22] Wolfram, Pohlers, Subsystems of set theory and second order number theory, in Buss [9].
[23] Joseph, Quinsey, Some problems in logic, Ph.D. thesis, Oxford University, 1980.
[24] Michael, Rathjen, The realm of ordinal analysis, Sets and proofs (Leeds, 1997), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1999, pp. 219-279.
[25] H. E., Rose, Subrecursion: Functions and hierarchies, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984.
[26] Helmut, Schwichtenberg, Proof theory: Some aspects of cut-elimination, in The handbook of mathematical logic (Jon, Barwise, editor), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977, pp. 867-895.
[27] Joseph, Shoenfield, Mathematical logic, Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1967.
[28] Richard, Sommer, Transfinite induction and hierarchies generated by transfinite recursion within Peano arithmetic, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 1990.
[29] Richard, Sommer, Ordinal arithmetic in IΔ0, Arithmetic, proof theory, and computational complexity (Peter, Clote and Jan, Krajicek, editors), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993, pp. 320-363.
[30] Alex, Wilkie and Jeff, Paris, On the scheme of induction for bounded arithmetic formulas, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 35 (1987), pp. 261-302.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×