Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T08:15:50.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

Introduction

Get access

Summary

The focus of this study is the poor law system, and the people who used it. Modelled on the English poor law of 1834, the Irish Poor Relief Act of 1838 established a nationwide system of poor relief based on the workhouse and financed by a local property tax. The poor law system remained the primary form of poor relief in Ireland until the 1920s, and in northern Ireland until after the second World War. From its inception, the poor law was the focus of criticism and complaint. As the author of an anonymous pamphlet published in 1857 declared, the poor law was ‘an acknowledged grievance, and complained of by all classes of the community, those who support it by the imposts levied on them, those who are forced to seek aid from it, and even the conscientious among the staff who are employed for, and so well paid to carry out the system’.

Accusations that the system was expensive, ineffective and pernicious were heard throughout the period of its existence. In 1886 the nationalist newspaper, The Nation, published an article by a workhouse physician lamenting ‘the deteriorating influence of workhouses’. He called for the poor law to be modified ‘in the direction of home relief’, which was less demoralising and more just to the deserving poor. This article was welcomed by a correspondent to the paper as highlighting ‘the glaring defects of this most expensive, ineffective and degrading system’. ‘Poverty in Ireland’, the writer claimed:

is condemned to starvation or imprisonment … no free people would tolerate such an unjust, cruel and costly system. It has been used as a political machine to effect purposes which are altogether outside the scope of Christian charity.

The political argument against the poor law was taken up the following year by the land campaigner and nationalist MP, Michael Davitt, who identified one of the most urgent tasks facing an Irish Parliament, as ‘the abolition, root and branch of the workhouse system’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Liverpool University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×