The Dome of the Rock and Templum Domini AN ‘OPEN SPOT’

In Jerusalem there was one place that particularly exhibited the potentially competitive relationship between the earthly Church and the earthly Jerusalem: the Dome of the Rock. When the crusaders besieged Jerusalem in July 1099, the site was an ‘open spot’ and there was no established interpretation of the Dome. It was probably regarded as a pagan building, as the ‘righteous’ spoils of war. This can at least be suggested based on Albert of Aachen's description of Tancred's plundering of the Dome:

The description of the pillaging – which took place immediately after the conquest – shows that the Dome of the Rock was a confusing building to the first crusaders. This was not least because the temple platform had been closed to the Christians during Abbasid rule. Unlike the situation at the Holy Sepulchre and other Christian churches, there was thus no continuity between the beliefs of the Byzantine Christians and the (Western) Christian interpretations of the place after the siege of the city.

Shortly after the conquest, in 1099–1100, the chapter of Templum Domini was established, and in the following decades its status could compete even with that of the chapter of the Holy Sepulchre. The newly settled Christians and the pilgrims of Jerusalem put forward various ideas about the origin of the building of Templum Domini: some maintained that it had been built by Solomon; the pilgrim Saewulf (1101–1103) proposed that its builder was the Roman emperor Hadrian; Albert of Aachen suggested ‘Christian worshippers’;