Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Acknowledgements
- List of Abbreviations
- Contents
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Bengal on the Eve of the Non-Cooperation and Khilafat Movement (1919–20)
- Chapter 2 Congress Organization in Bengal 1921–22
- Chapter 3 Congress and the Masses: The Non-Cooperation and Khilafat Movement in Bengal 1920–22
- Chapter 4 Congress in the Post Non-Cooperation Period, 1922–29
- Chapter 5 Civil Disobedience Movement in Bengal, 1930–34
- Chapter 6 Congress in Electoral Politics and After, 1935–39
- Conclusion
- Glossary
- Bibliography
- Appendix
- Notes
- Index
Chapter 1 - Bengal on the Eve of the Non-Cooperation and Khilafat Movement (1919–20)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2012
- Frontmatter
- Acknowledgements
- List of Abbreviations
- Contents
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Bengal on the Eve of the Non-Cooperation and Khilafat Movement (1919–20)
- Chapter 2 Congress Organization in Bengal 1921–22
- Chapter 3 Congress and the Masses: The Non-Cooperation and Khilafat Movement in Bengal 1920–22
- Chapter 4 Congress in the Post Non-Cooperation Period, 1922–29
- Chapter 5 Civil Disobedience Movement in Bengal, 1930–34
- Chapter 6 Congress in Electoral Politics and After, 1935–39
- Conclusion
- Glossary
- Bibliography
- Appendix
- Notes
- Index
Summary
In many ways the First World War was a harbinger of change in Indian politics. Economic dislocation, inflated prices and government control on trade increased the hardships of the people, making them increasingly conscious of the oppressive nature of the rule of their imperial government. In Bengal the intellectual element pondered over the cause-and-effect relationship between the political situation and the economic condition.
The Bengali popular press was particularly vocal against colonial indifference to the economic plight of the people. The Viswamitra thought that ‘subjugation was the real cause of famine because the commercial policy of the government enabled the foreigners to exploit the land’. The Hitabadi too was of the opinion that the establishment of mills and factories had not benefited India and the artisan class was growing poorer. Dainik Bharatmitra argued that prospect of British capitalists opening more factories would mean further systematic exploitation. Samyavadi felt that to eliminate India's poverty it was necessary to ensure not only that the raw materials for manufacture came from India, but also that the manufacturers should themselves be Indians. British policy was held responsible for encouraging foreign exploiters and the Marwaris. The Bengali pointed out that the monopoly enjoyed by the Railways and the Steamer Company was the cause of high prices. The most insistent cry was against the export of rice. When the restrictions against interprovincial movements of rice crops were removed, it created a great stir.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Congress Politics in Bengal 1919–1939 , pp. 13 - 26Publisher: Anthem PressPrint publication year: 2003