Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T22:20:49.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 3 - Indian Penitentiary and the Historiographical Silence about Women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2011

Suvarna Cherukuri
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Siena College, New York
Get access

Summary

Colonialism and patriarchy have silenced the voice of women in the penal history of India. This historiographical silence may be attributed to multiple causes:

  1. a. Female criminality never struck public imagination as a dangerous phenomenon.

  2. b. Female crimes formed a negligible portion of the overall crime rate, thereby resulting in a scholarly neglect.

  3. c. Colonialism bore an administrative diffidence towards gender issues.

This place of women inmates in history, or rather the lack of one, cannot be understood in vacuum. It must be located within the context of ancient, medieval, and colonial judicial system in India and various penal reforms that have had only a ritualistic acknowledgement towards women offenders. These reforms are a self-perpetuating exercise with few results. Women simply become another insignificant category in reform literature. The discussion in the following pages addresses:

  1. a. The history of penology in India. This discussion addresses the judicial systems that existed in ancient and medieval India. This discussion is relevant since it not only provides the context for the historical understanding of crime and punishment in India but also the way women fit in this discourse.

  2. b. The colonial foundations of the Indian penitentiary. The history of the contemporary penal regime in India begins with the colonial foundations of the criminal justice system. The imperatives and conditions which formed the basis for the evolution of the criminal judicial system were strongly colonial. It is interesting to notice that what seemed to be simple colonial imperatives could adapt traditional intransigence as well as the modernist progressive pretense as regards gender and other inequities.

  3. c. Penal Reforms. One after the other these reforms have reproduced the earlier findings.

Type
Chapter
Information
Women in Prison
An Insight into Captivity and Crime
, pp. 41 - 56
Publisher: Foundation Books
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×