Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T20:20:21.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Planned State under Party Guidance

from PART IV - ONE-PARTY SOCIALIST STATE (1974–88)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2015

Get access

Summary

The Burma Socialist Programme Party (BSPP) that was transformed into a mass party prior to the institution of the Socialist Constitution that mandated one-party rule became the supreme economic as well as political authority of Myanmar. The elected government formulated and executed long- and short-term economic plans under the guidance of the BSPP cadres whose supervisory and monitoring functions extended from the centre through the regional hierarchy of party apparatus down to the enterprise and ward/village tract level.

BURMA SOCIALIST PROGRAMME PARTY MONOPOLY

Instituted on 3 January 1974, the Socialist Republic of the Union of Burma was a unitary one-party socialist state led by the BSPP. Electoral representation was based on a four-tier hierarchy consisting of three regional people's councils (ward/village, township, and state/division) and the Pyithu Hluttaw (“Parliament”), held on a quadrennial basis. However, given the BSPP's prerogative of nominating “official” candidates, elections implied confirmation rather than competition.

The locus of all three state powers (executive, judicial, and legislative) was the BSPP-dominated unicameral Pyithu Hluttaw, thereby blurring the demarcation between the party and the state. There were regional and local administrative and judicial bodies under the central organs of state power. The state executive operated under the leadership and guidance of the Central Committee and the Central Executive Committee (CEC) of the BSPP. Similarly, the territorial hierarchy of people's councils were supervised by the corresponding regional party organs. The new political order was predicated upon the BSPP's “centralized control, pervasive authority and sole legitimacy”.

Type
Chapter
Information
State Dominance in Myanmar
The Political Economy of Industrialization
, pp. 161 - 249
Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×