Outline of the Historical and Theoretical Perspectives

Foreign direct investment (FDI) activity in the strict sense, of consequence to international law, began in the mid-nineteenth century, essentially dominated by the capital exporting countries in Europe and surged dramatically after Second World War, but this time predominately led by the U.S. multinational corporations (MNCs). Traditionally, the recurring underlying reasons for MNCs to venture abroad include: to strategically capture world market, secure raw materials, minimize transaction costs and reap economies of scale, among others.

It follows that MNCs in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and still at present are pervasive power-wielding organizations: they can unleash political, social, and economic upheavals in the host countries. Not surprisingly, MNCs together with their home states have exerted demands to be treated to an external international law standard. Accordingly, for these reasons MNCs can be subjected to the regulatory controls of the host countries. Moreover, the popular Calvo doctrine squarely places MNCs treatment in par with national treatment, neither more nor less.

In the immediate post-colonial period, MNCs were still to a large extent, treated with suspicion by most of the independent states. Thus, these states were determined to pursue their right to “economic self-determination” without substantial foreign linkages.

There was, however, a complete paradigm shift in some developing countries' economic policy strategies in the 1980s — FDI was embraced as part of their overall development strategy. Muchinski (1995, p. 11) explains: