Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T19:47:39.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Toward Relative Decency: The Case for Prudence

from ARGUMENTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2015

David Martin Jones
Affiliation:
University of Queensland, Australia
Get access

Summary

In Europe in the eighteenth century, proponents of the Enlightenment argued that external and internal security were ineluctably linked to rational progress toward a universal condition of democratic pluralism. That linkage of security and democracy was both the fondest dream and a notable legacy of the Enlightenment project. In Southeast Asia in the twenty-first century, that project has resurfaced in the effort by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) to acquire a legal persona by basing itself, for the first time, on a Charter.

This democracy-security nexus dates from Immanuel Kant's eschatological hope for universal and perpetual peace, founded on a foedus pacificum, or league of peace—a confederation of constitutional regimes. Central to this understanding is a teleology that assumes a progressive global movement toward a reasonable, rule-governed, international order founded on universally agreed norms, rather than on the dictates of state interest, culture, power, or self.

This hope informs Francis Fukuyama's influential post-Cold War treatise on “the end of history.” It also represents the methodological premise of journals devoted to the study of democracy and democratization, and illustrates contemporary normative and constructivist views of the evolving character of international society. In its most philosophically coherent post-Cold War formulation, John Rawls maintained, in The Law of Peoples, that any hope we have of reaching this benign historical terminus—what he called a realistic utopia—rests “on there being reasonable liberal and constitutional (and decent) regimes sufficiently established and effective to yield a viable Society of Peoples.” Those living in such a society would, in this conception, “follow the ideals and principles of the Law of Peoples in their mutual relations.”

In Rawls’ scheme, the prospect for both global and, in the Southeast Asian context featured here, regional peace and progress requires the projection of a “Law of Peoples,” or more precisely a norm of justice as fairness, into the international order. This norm should shape both the conduct of states and regions as the latter have evolved as postnational constellations in the years since Europe's Treaty of Rome in 1957.

Type
Chapter
Information
Hard Choices
Security, Democracy, and Regionalism in Southeast Asia
, pp. 265 - 291
Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×