Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T17:11:47.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IV - Retirement Income Changes in Singapore

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2015

Get access

Summary

Introduction

As part of the 1986 policies aimed at restoring economic growth to Singapore, the employer contribution to the Central Provident Fund (CPF) of Singapore was reduced from 25 per cent of wages with a $19,500 annual maximum, to 10 per cent of wages with a $7,800 ceiling. The employee contribution remained at 25 per cent of wages with a $19,500 annual maximum. The initial announcement spoke of a two-year suspension of the incremental 15 per cent employer contribution. A subsequent official statement expressed hope of a slow gradual restoration over an unspecified time period. This chapter provides a range of estimates for the resulting shortfall in retirement incomes of Singapore employees, as compared to continuation of the full 25 per cent employer contribution.

Methods

First we present the percentage declines in the remaining CPF accumulations of employees who have 5, or 10, or 15, or 20, or 25 or 30 or 35 more years of contribution to make until terminal valuation at age 55. We consider seven alternative time-paths: the norm of 25 per cent, the status quo of 10 per cent, as well as five scenarios over time of return to the full 25 per cent employer contribution. Because percentages alone do not tell the full story, in the latter parts of this chapter we show projected dollar values for the 14 simulated cases.

In each case, we use the total CPF accumulation valued at age 55 as a proxy for retirement income, since it is potentially convertible into a life annuity. Whether or not a significant portion of CPF savers elect to exercise that particular option, is not critical to our findings.

In each case, the employee contribution to the CPF remains at 25 per cent, thus the variations occur in the employer share.

Time-path (1), our benchmark, has the 25 per cent employer share, continuing throughout the 35-year period.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
Print publication year: 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×