Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:54:26.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The embryonic sovereign and the biological citizen: the biopolitics of reproductive rights

from Part III - Platforms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

By
Patrick Hanafin
Edited by
Conor Gearty  and
Costas Douzinas
Conor Gearty
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Costas Douzinas
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Get access

Summary

[T]he role of church–state relations . . . in laying a particular path for bioethical governance . . . in countries with a strong Catholic influence at institutional levels . . . show[s] the . . . difficulties in dealing with the legacy of the church regarding . . . definitions of the embryo.

Italy’s soul searching on how to come to terms with [human embryonic stem cell] research addressed questions about what life is and what it should be, about who is allowed to speak and act on it, and about the appropriate places of law and the state in answering these.

[T]he right to life explodes an already ambiguous notion of ‘human rights’.

When individuals in liberal democratic societies attempt to win greater control over decision-making about their bodies they are engaged in an unequal power struggle with the state. In order to win more freedom they must of necessity go before the law in order to assert these rights or lobby the government for a change in legislation. This active intervention by the individual to win such power has been defined by Nikolas Rose and Carlos Novas as biological citizenship. This term describes the phenomenon whereby individuals increasingly define their citizenship in terms of their rights to life, health and cure. This active form of citizenship also has an ethical dimension for Rose. Rose uses the term ethopolitics to define this aspect of biological citizenship. Within this ethopolitical mode individuals ‘use their individual and collective lives, the evidence of their own existence . . . [to] demand civil and human rights . . . They call for recognition, respect, resources . . . control over medical and technical expertise.’ Rose’s notion of ethopolitics allows us to visualise the potential of deliberative participative politics within the context of reproductive rights.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Human Rights Law , pp. 191 - 213
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bazzicalupo, L., ‘The Ambivalences of Biopolitics’ (2006) 36 (2) Diacritics109–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownsword, R., ‘Regulating Human Genetics: New Dilemmas for a New Millennium’ 12 Medical Law Review14–39CrossRef
Fenton, R., ‘Catholic Doctrine Versus Women’s Rights: The New Italian Law On Assisted Reproduction’ 14 Medical Law Review73–107CrossRef
Hanafin, P., ‘Gender, Citizenship and Human Reproduction in Contemporary Italy’ (2006) 14 (3) Feminist Legal Studies329–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanafin, P., Conceiving Life: Reproductive Politics and the Law in Contemporary Italy (Aldershot: Ashgate 2007)Google Scholar
Hanafin, P., ‘Cultures of Life: Embryo Protection and the Pluralist State’, in Freeman, M. (ed.), Law and Bioethics (Oxford University Press 2008) 177–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanafin, P., ‘Refusing Disembodiment: Abortion and the Paradox of Reproductive Rights in Contemporary Italy’ (2009) 10 (2) Feminist Theory227–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (ed.), Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2011)CrossRef
Meltzer, I., ‘Between Church and State: Stem Cells, Embryos, and Citizens in Italian Politics’, in Jasanoff, S. (ed.), Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2011) 105–24Google Scholar
Rodotà, S., La vita e le regole: Tra diritto e non diritto (Milan: Feltrinelli 2006)Google Scholar
Rose, N., ‘The Politics of Life Itself’ (2001) 18 (6) Theory, Culture & Society1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, N. and Novas, C., ‘Biological Citizenship’, in Ong, A. and Collier, S. J. (eds.), Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems (Oxford: Blackwell 2005) 439–63Google Scholar
McDonnell, O. and Allison, J., ‘From Biopolitics to Bioethics: Church, State, Medicine and Assisted Reproductive Technology In Ireland’ (2006) 28 (6) Sociology of Health & Illness817–37 at 833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzer, I., ‘Between Church and State: Stem Cells, Embryos, and Citizens in Italian Politics’, in Jasanoff, S. (ed.), Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2011) 105–24 at 107.Google Scholar
Bazzicalupo, L., ‘The Ambivalences of Biopolitics’ (2006) 36 (2) Diacritics109–16 at 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, N. and Novas, C., ‘Biological Citizenship’, in Ong, A. and Collier, S. J. (eds.), Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems (Oxford: Blackwell 2005) 439–63 at 440.Google Scholar
Rose, N., ‘The Politics of Life Itself’ (2001) 18 (6) Theory, Culture & Society1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legge 19 febbraio 2004, no. 40, ‘Norme in materia di procreazione medicalmente assistita’ (Gazzetta Ufficiale no. 45 del 24 febbraio 2004)
Hanafin, P., Conceiving Life: Reproductive Politics and the Law in Contemporary Italy (Aldershot: Ashgate 2007) 49–80.Google Scholar
Brownsword, R., ‘Regulating Human Genetics: New Dilemmas for a New Millennium’ (2004) 12 Medical Law Review14–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dameno, R., ‘La legge sulla procreazione medicalmente assistita: “una legge manifesto”’, in AA. VV., Un Appropriazione Indebita: L’uso del corpo della donna nella nuova legge sulla procreazione assistita (Milan: Baldini Castoldi Dalai 2004)Google Scholar
Balibar, É, Politics and The Other Scene (London: Verso 2002) 167.Google Scholar
da Costa, B. and Philip, K. (eds.), Tactical Biopolitics: Art, Activism, and Technoscience (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2008)CrossRef
Zerilli, L., Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom (University of Chicago Press 2005) 127.Google Scholar
Caldwell, L., Italian Family Matters: Women, Politics and Legal Reform (Basingstoke: Macmillan 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffino, N., Ramjoue, C. and Varone, F., ‘Biomedical Policies in Belgium and Italy: From Regulatory Reluctance to Policy Changes’ (2009) 32 (3) West European Politics559–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodotà, S., La vita e le regole: Tra diritto e non diritto (Milan: Feltrinelli 2006)Google Scholar
Lalli, C., Liberta procreativa (Naples: Liguori Editori 2004) 129–71.Google Scholar
Valentini, C., La fecondazione proibita (Milan: Feltrinelli 2004)Google Scholar
Flamigni, C. and Mori, M., La legge sulla procreazione medicalmente assistita: paradigmi a confronto (Milan: Net 2005) 39–42.Google Scholar
Cirant, E., Non si gioca con la vita: Una posizione laica sulla procreazione assistita (Rome: Editori Riuniti 2005) 190–204.Google Scholar
Collier, S. J. and Lakoff, A., ‘On Regimes of Living’, in Ong, A. and Collier, S. J. (eds.), Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems (Oxford: Blackwell 2005) 22–39 at 29.Google Scholar
Rose, N. and Novas, C., ‘Biological Citizenship’, in Ong, A. and Collier, S. J. (eds.), Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems (Oxford: Blackwell 2005) 439–63 at 440.Google Scholar
Agamben, G., Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (University of Minnesota Press 1999)Google Scholar
Biehl, J., Will To Live: AIDS Therapies and the Politics of Survival (Princeton University Press 2007) 135.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (ed.), Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2011) 12CrossRef
Barbera, A. and Morrone, A., La Repubblica dei referendum (Bologna: Il Mulino 2003) 11–27.Google Scholar
Luzi, G., ‘Procreazione, quorum fallito’, (2005) La Repubblica 14 June 2Google Scholar
Fenton, R., ‘Catholic Doctrine Versus Women’s Rights: The New Italian Law On Assisted Reproduction’ (2006) 14 Medical Law Review73–107 at 100–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trucco, L., ‘La procreazione medicalmente assistita al vaglio della Corte Costituzionale’ (2006) Consulta Online
Luca Morsiani, S., ‘A buon intenditor poche parole’ (2006) Forum di Quaderni Costituzionali
Morelli, A., ‘Quando la Corte decide di non decidere. Mancato riorso all’illegitimità conseguenziale e selezione discrezionale dei casi (nota a margine dell’ord. no. 369 del 2006)’ (2006) Forum di Quaderni Costituzionali
Connolly, W., Why I Am Not A Secularist (University of Minnesota Press 1999) 147Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×