Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 August 2019
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Troilus and Cressida , pp. 242 - 249Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005
References
Promptbooks
Guthrie, Tyrone. Promptbook for Old Vic, London and tour, 1956–7. Three copies now in Bristol University Theatre Collection.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter, and Barton, John. Promptbook for RSC, Edinburgh and Aldwych, 1962, now in SCL.Google Scholar
Harrison, John. Promptbook for BR, Birmingham, 1963, in Sir Barry Jackson Archives, Birmingham.Google Scholar
Poel, William. Promptbook, 1912, two copies now in Enthoven Collection, British Theatre Museum.Google Scholar
Videotapes of productions
Editions and adaptations
William Shakespeare’s Comedies, Histories, & Tragedies, London, 1623. Facsimile prepared by Kökeritz, Helge, New Haven: Yale, 1954.Google Scholar
Beckerman, Bernard and Papp, Joseph. The Festival Shakespeare Troilus and Cressida. New York, 1967.Google Scholar
Daniel, George. Remarks, Troilus and Cressida, Adapted for stage presentation, Cumberland’s British Theatre (No. 385).Google Scholar
Dawson, Anthony B. The New Cambridge Shakespeare Troilus and Cressida. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Dryden, John. Troilus and Cressida: or, Truth Found too Late, The Comedies, Tragedies, and Operas, Vol. ii. London, 1701.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen, Cohen, Walter, et al. The Norton Shakespeare. New York: W. W. Norton, 1997.Google Scholar
Hillebrand, Harold N. and Baldwin, T. W.. A New Variorum Edition of Shakespeare: Troilus and Cressida. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1953.Google Scholar
, J. R. Troilus and Cressida, ‘Altered from Shakespeare and Dryden, 5 December 1810’. Copy in Folger Shakespeare Library.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel and Steevens, George. The Plays of William Shakespeare, Vol. ix, 1773.Google Scholar
Standard reference works
A Biographical Dictionary of Actors, Actresses, Musicians, Dancers & Other Stage Personnel in London, 1660–1800. Ed. Highfill, Philip H. Jr, Burnim, Kalman A. and Langhans, Edward A.. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1973–8.Google Scholar
The London Stage, 1660–1800. Parts 1–3. Ed. van Lennep, William, et al. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1960–5.Google Scholar
Other works
Aggeler, Geoffrey. ‘Utah Shakespeare Festival’. Shakespeare Quarterly 36 (1985): 230–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asp, Carolyn. ‘In Defense of Cressida’. Studies in Philology 74 (October 1977): 406–17.Google Scholar
Asp, Carolyn ‘Transcendence Denied: The Failure of Role Assumption in Troilus and Cressida’. Studies in English Literature 18 (Spring 1978): 257–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beale, Simon Russell. ‘Thersites in Troilus and Cressida’. In Players of Shakespeare 3: Further Essays on Shakespearean Performances. Ed. Jackson, Russell and Smallwood, Robert. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 160–73.Google Scholar
Berry, Ralph. On Directing Shakespeare: Interviews with Contemporary Directors. London: Hamish Hamilton, 1989.Google Scholar
Berry, Ralph Shakespeare and the Awareness of Audience. London: Macmillan. 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Frederick S. Shakespeare and his Predecessors. New York: Charles Scribners Sons, 1896.Google Scholar
Boling, Ronald J. ‘Stage Images of Cressida’s Betrayal’. Essays in Theatre 14 (1955–6): 147–58.Google Scholar
Bowen, Barbara E. Gender in the Theater of War: Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida. New York: Garland Publishing Company, 1993.Google Scholar
Bratton, J. S. ‘Theatre of War: The Crimea on the London Stage, 1854–55’. In Performance and Politics in Popular Drama: Aspects of Popular Entertainment in Theatre, Film and Television, 1800–1976. Ed. James, Louis and Sharrett, Bernard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Brockbank, Philip. ‘“Troilus and Cressida”: Character and Value, 1200 bc to ad 1985’. In On Shakespeare: Jesus, Shakespeare and Karl Marx and Other Essays. London: Blackwell, 1989, pp. 30–59.Google Scholar
Brown, Ivor. Shakespeare Memorial Theatre 1954–56: A Photographic Record. London: Max Reinhardt, 1956.Google Scholar
Brown, John Russell. ‘Three Directors: A Review of Recent Productions’. Shakespeare Survey 14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1961, pp. 129–37.Google Scholar
Bullough, Geoffrey, ed. Narrative and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare, Vol. vi. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966.Google Scholar
Byrne, Muriel St. Claire. ‘Fifty Years of Shakespearian Production: 1898–1948’. Shakespeare Survey 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1949, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Charney, Maurice. Shakespeare on Love and Lust. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Shakespearean Criticism, Vol. ii. Ed. Raysor, Thomas Middleton. London: Dent [1960].Google Scholar
Comtois, M. E. ‘New York Shakespeare Festival, Lincoln Center, 1973–74’. Shakespeare Quarterly 25 (Autumn 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Carol. ‘Unbodied Figures of Desire’. In Performing Feminisms: Feminist Critical Theory and Theatre. Ed. Chase, Sue Ellen. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Crosse, Gordon. Unpublished Notebooks, at Birmingham Public Library; on Microfilm at Folger Shakespeare Library.Google Scholar
David, Richard. ‘Drams of Eale: A Review of Recent Productions’. Shakespeare Survey 10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1957, pp. 126–34.Google Scholar
Designing Shakespeare: An Audio Visual Archive 1960–2000. http://ahds.rhul.ac.uk/ahdscollections/Google Scholar
Dessen, Alan. ‘What’s New? Shakespeare on Stage in 1986’. Shakespeare Quarterly 38 (1987): 90–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryden, John. ‘On The Grounds of Criticism in Tragedy’. The Comedies, Tragedies, and Operas, Vol. ii. London: 1702.Google Scholar
Dusinberre, Juliet. ‘“Troilus and Cressida” and the Definition of Beauty’. Shakespeare Survey 36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983, pp. 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, W. R. Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida and the Inns of Court Revels. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate, 2000.Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth Lloyd. ‘The Reason Why: The Royal Shakespeare Season Reviewed’. Shakespeare Survey 22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969, pp. 135–44.Google Scholar
Foakes, R. A. ‘Troilus and Cressida Reconsidered’. University of Toronto Quarterly 32 (January 1963): 142–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Gayle. ‘Shakespeare’s Cressida: “A Kind of Self”’. In The Woman’s Part. Ed. Lenz, Carolyn Swift, et al. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1980, pp. 133–49.Google Scholar
Grigely, Joseph. Textuality: Art, Theory and Textual Criticism. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Hazlitt, William. ‘Characters in Shakespeare’s Plays’. Complete Works, Vol. iv. Ed. Howe, P. P.. London: Dent, 1930.Google Scholar
Helms, Lorraine. ‘Playing the Woman’s Part: Feminist Criticism and Shakespearean Performance’. In Performing Feminisms: Feminist Critical Theory and Theatre. Ed. Chase, Sue Ellen. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Hodgdon, Barbara. ‘He do Cressida in Different Voices’. English Literary Renaissance 20 (1990): 254–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Peter. English Shakespeares: Shakespeare on the English Stage in the 1990s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter ‘Shakespeare Performances in England, 1989–1990’. Shakespeare Survey 44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 157–90.Google Scholar
Hook, Lucyle. ‘Shakespare Improv’d, or A Case for the Affirmative’. Shakespeare Quarterly 4 (1953): 289–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hortmann, Wilhelm. Shakespeare on the German Stage: The Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Kastan, David Scott and Keever, Tom Dale. ‘Sir Peter Hall’s Troilus and Cressida and the Tradition of the Play’. Theatre for a New Audience web site. www.tfana.org/2001/troilusGoogle Scholar
Kaula, David. ‘Will and Reason in Troilus and Cressida’. Shakespeare Quarterly 12 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimbrough, Robert. ‘The Origins of Troilus and Cressida: Stage, Quarto and Folio’. PMLA 77 (June 1962): 194–9.Google Scholar
Kimbrough, Robert ‘The Troilus Log: Shakespeare and “Box-Office”’. Shakespeare Quarterly 15 (1964): 201–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, G. Wilson. Principles of Shakespearian Production With Especial Reference to the Tragedies. London: Faber and Faber [1936].Google Scholar
Kott, Jan. Shakespeare Our Contemporary. Trans. Taborska, Boleslaw. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1966.Google Scholar
Lennox, Charlotte. ‘The Fable of “Troilus and Cressida”’. Shakespeare Illustrated, Vol. iii. London, 1754.Google Scholar
Lundstrom, Rinder F. William Poel’s Hamlet: The Director as Critic. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Research Press, 1981.Google Scholar
McAlindon, Tom. ‘Language, Style and Meaning in Troilus and Cressida’. PMLA 84 (January 1969): 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlinchee, Claire. ‘Stratford, Connecticut Shakespeare Festival, 1961’ Shakespeare Quarterly 12 (1961): 421–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManaway, James G. ‘Additional Prompt-Books of Shakespeare from the Smock Alley Theatre’. Modern Language Review 45 (1950): 64–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Edward Haviland. ‘Shakespeare in the Grand Style’. Shakespeare Quarterly 1 (1950): 243–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monck, Nugent. ‘The Maddermarket Theatre and the Playing of Shakespeare’. Shakespeare Survey 12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1959, pp. 71–5.Google Scholar
Muir, Kenneth. ‘Troilus and Cressida’. Shakespeare Survey 8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1955, pp. 28–39.Google Scholar
Newlin, Jeanne T. ‘The Darkened Stage: J. P. Kemble and Troilus and Cressida’. In The Triple Bond: Plays, Mainly Shakespearean, In Performance. Ed. Price, Joseph G.. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1975, pp. 190–202.Google Scholar
Newlin, Jeanne T. ‘The Modernity of Troilus and Cressida: The Case for Theatrical Criticism’. Harvard Library Bulletin, 17 (1969): 353–75.Google Scholar
Oates, Joyce Carol [Smith, J. Oates]. ‘Essence and Existence in Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida’. Philological Quarterly (1967): 167–85.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Marion. ‘William Poel to George Bernard Shaw’. Theatre Notebook 54:3 (2000): 167–76.Google Scholar
Papp, Joseph. ‘Directing Troilus and Cressida’. In The Festival Shakespeare Troilus and Cressida. New York, 1967.Google Scholar
Rossiter, A. P. ‘The Modernity of “Troilus and Cressida”’. Lecture at Stratford, 25 August 1954.Google Scholar
Roy, Emil. ‘War and Manliness in Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida’. Comparative Drama 7 (1973): 107–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutter, Carol. Enter the Body: Women and Representation on Shakespeare’s Stage. London: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Schoenbaum, Samuel. William Shakespeare: A Documentary Life. New York: Oxford University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, George Bernard. ‘Ibsen Ahead’. In Our Theatres in the Nineties, vol. 2. London: Constable and Company, 1932.Google Scholar
Shaw, William. ‘Meager Lead and Joyous Consequences: RSC Triumphs Among Shakespeare’s Minor Plays’. Theatre Survey 27 (May 1986): 37–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirley, Frances A. Shakespeare’s Use of Off-Stage Sounds. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Shrimpton, Nicholas. ‘Shakespeare Performances in London and Stratford-upon-Avon’. Shakespeare Survey 39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986, pp. 191–206.Google Scholar
Slights, Robert C. ‘The Parallel Structure of Troilus and Cressida’. Shakespeare Quarterly 25 (1972): 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smallwood, Robert. ‘Shakespearean Performances in England, 1996’. Shakespeare Survey 50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 201–24.Google Scholar
Smallwood, Robert ‘Shakespearean Performances in England, 1999’, Shakespeare Survey 53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 244–73.Google Scholar
Speaight, Robert William Poel and the Elizabethan Revival. London: William Heinemann, 1954.Google Scholar
Spencer, Hazelton Shakespeare Improved: The Restoration Versions in Quarto and on the Stage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, Arthur Colby and Trewin, J. C.. Shakespeare’s Plays Today: Some Customs and Conventions of the Stage. London: Sidgwick and Jackson, 1970.Google Scholar
Spurgeon, Caroline. Shakespeare’s Imagery and What it Tells Us. Boston: Beacon Hill Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Styan, J. L. ‘Political Cressida in Performance’. In Shakespeare Worldwide. Ed. Kawachi, Yoshiko. Tokyo: Yoshodo, 1995, pp. 263–6.Google Scholar
Tatlock, J. S. P. ‘The Siege of Troy in Elizabethan Literature, Especially in Shakespeare and Heywood’. PMLA 30 (1915): 673–770.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary. ‘Troilus and Cressida: Bibliography, performance and Interpretation’. Shakespeare Studies 15 (1982): 99–136.Google Scholar
Tylee, Claire M. ‘The Text of Cressida and Every Ticklish Reader: Troilus and Cressida, The Greek Camp Scene’. Shakespeare Survey 41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989, pp. 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voth, Grant L. and Evans, Oliver H.. ‘Cressida and the World of the Play’. Shakespeare Studies 14 (1975): 231–9.Google Scholar
Walker, Alice. ‘The Textual Problem of Troilus and Cressida’. Modern Language Review 45 (1950): 459–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Roger. ‘Theory and Practice: Stratford, 1976’. Shakespeare Survey 30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977, pp. 169–79.Google Scholar
Warren, Roger ‘Interpretations of Shakespearean Comedy, 1981’. Shakespeare Survey 35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, pp. 141–52.Google Scholar
Wood, Roger and Clarke, Mary. ‘Troilus and Cressida’. Shakespeare at the Old Vic. New York: Macmillan, 1957.Google Scholar
Worthen, W. B. ‘Drama, Performativity and Performance’. PMLA 113 (October, 1998): 1093–107.Google Scholar
Yoder, R. A. ‘Sons and Daughters of the Game: An Essay on Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida’. Shakespeare Survey 25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972, pp. 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar