Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T10:41:04.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rumen degradation of straw. 7. Effects of chemical pre-treatment and addition of propionic acid on degradation characteristics of botanical fractions barley stra treated with a cellulase preparation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Y. Nakashima  and
E. R. Ørskov
Y. Nakashima
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
E. R. Ørskov
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Get access

Abstract

Four experiments were carried out to measure the effects of exposure to a cellulase preparation on the degradation characteristics of whole barley straw and its botanical fractions. The effect of chemical pre-treatment (NaOH and H2O2) on treatment with a cellulase preparation and the addition of propionic acid to inhibit loss of dry matter were also studied during the fermentation of ensiled straws. Samples of each preparation were incubated in polyester bags in the rumens of three sheep to estimate degradability. The data were described using the equationp = a + b (1—ec) where p is degradability at time t and a, b and c are constants.

The pH of ensiled straw was consistently decreased (P < 0·01) and the solubility increased (P < 0·01) by treatment with a cellulase preparation and by increasing the period of ensiling. The b values were decreased by increasing the length of the ensiling period (F < 0·01). The increase in the solubility of the treated botanical fractions was particularly apparent for the leaf blades, followed by leaf sheath, with the internodes being least affected (P < 0·01). However, treatment with a cellulase preparation had little or no effect in increasing the potential degradability (a + b) of any botanical fraction. The degradability of the whole plant and botanical fractions of straw increased (P < 0·01) with NaOH treatment and was further improved (P < 0·01) by alkaline H2O2 treatment. The increase was greater in internodes than in leaf sheath (P < 0·01). Treatment with a cellulase preparation and chemical pre-treatment had little or no effect on the 48-h dry-matter loss (DML) and the (a + b) values, but it increased (P < 0·01) the a values and solubility.

DML from straw treated with a cellulase preparation during fermentation decreased (P < 0·01) from about 60 to less than 10 g/kg with 30 g propionic acid added per kg straw to inhibit bacterial activity. The decreased fermentation loss was reflected in an increase in the 48-h DML and potential (a + b) values of straw treated with a cellulase preparation.

Type
Papers
Information
Animal Production , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , June 1989 , pp. 543 - 551
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bertin, G., Heilings, Ph. and Vanbelle, M. 1985. The effect of cellulolytic enzyme preparations as in vitro improvement for forage digestibility. Processing and conservation of forages including leaf protein in research. Proceedings of the 15th International Grassland Congress, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 9–20.Google Scholar
Bhargava, P. K., Ørskov, E. R. and Walli, T. K. 1988. Rumen degradation of straw. 4. Selection and degradation of morphological components of barley straw by sheep. Animal Production 47: 105–110.Google Scholar
Chesson, A. 1984. Microbiology of the rumen in relation to the chemical or biological treatment of crops and by-products. Proceedings of a Second Seminar on the Upgrading of Crops and By-products, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Gould, J. M. and Freer, S. N. 1984. High efficiency ethanol production from lignocellulosic residues pretreated with alkaline H2O. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 26: 628–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, R. D. 1983. Degradation of cell walls of forages by sequential treatments with sodium hydroxide and a commercial cellulase preparation. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 34: 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, A. R. and McDonald, P. 1977. The effect of cellulase preparations on the chemical changes during the ensilage of grass in laboratory silos. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 28: 486–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, A. R., McDonald, P. and Anderson, D. 1982. The effect of a cellulase preparation derived from Trichoderma viride on the chemical changes during the ensilage of grass, lucerne and clover. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 33: 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leatherwood, J. M., Mochrie, R. D. and Thomas, W. E. 1959. Chemical changes produced by a cellulolytic preparation added to silages. Journal of Animal Science 18: 1539 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Mehrez, A. Z. and Ørskov, E. R. 1977. A study of the artificial fibre bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88: 645–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakashima, Y., Ørskov, E. R., Hotten, P. M., Ambo, K. and Takase, Y. 1988. Rumen degradation of straw. 6. Effect of polysaccharidase enzymes on degradation characteristics of ensiled rice straw. Animal Production 47: 421–427.Google Scholar
No, E., Harasawa, Y., Ataku, K., Narasaki, N. and Sueyoshi, T. 1985. Effect of cellulase preparation on fermentation of silage. Processing and conservation of forages including leaf protein research. Proceedings of the 15th International Grassland Congress, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 9–19.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92: 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramanzin, M., Ørskov, E. R. and Tuah, A. K. 1986. Rumen degradation of straw. 2. Botanical fractions of straw from two barley cultivars. Animal Production 43: 271–278.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1976. Statistical Methods. 7th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames la.Google Scholar
Tuah, A. K., Lufadeju, E., Ørskov, E. R. and Blackett, G. A. 1986. Rumen degradation of straw. 1. Untreated and ammonia-treated barley, oat and wheat straw varieties and triticale straw. Animal Production 43: 261–269.Google Scholar