Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T09:51:08.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Numerical Taxonomic Study of Fucus Distichus (Phaeophyta)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

E. L. Rice  and
A. R. O. Chapman
E. L. Rice
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 4J1
A. R. O. Chapman
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 4J1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The genus Fucus L. is widely distributed through the cool temperate waters of the north Atlantic and north Pacific oceans. The very large number of sub-generic taxa (> 100) previously recognized was reduced by Powell (1963) to only 6 species. In his revision, Powell recognized F. distichus L. emend. Powell as the most variable of these. He classified the intra-specific variation in this species into 4 sub-species: F. distichus distichus, F. distichus anceps (Harv. et Ward ex. Carruthers) Powell, F. distichus evanescens (C.Ag) Powell and F. distichus edentatus (Pyl.) Powell. Because of reports that intermediate forms existed in Iceland (Jonsson, 1903) and the Faeröes (Börgesen, 1902), Powell (1957 a,b) decided to use sub-specific status rather than specific designation for these 4 taxa. However, within North America the 4 sub-species of F. distichus were often assigned specific rank (e.g. Taylor, 1957).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , May 1985 , pp. 433 - 459
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agardh, C. A., 1820. Species Algarum, vol. 1. 531 pp. Lund: Reprinted 1969, Amsterdam: Asher.Google Scholar
Agardh, C. A., 1821. Icones Algarum Ineditae, fasc. 2. 2 pp. + plates. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Agardh, J. G., 1868. Bidrag till Kännedomen af Spetsbergen Alger. Tillägg till Föregående afhandling. Kungliga Svenska uetenskapsakademiens handlingar, 7 (8), 27–49 +plate 3.Google Scholar
Altukhov, Yu. P., 1981. The stock concept from the viewpoint of population genetics. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 38, 1523–1538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baardseth, E., 1970. A square-scanning, two-stage sampling method of estimating seaweed quantities. Report. Norwegian Institute of Seaweed Research, 33, 41 pp.Google Scholar
Blackith, R. E. & Reyment, R. A. 1971. Multivariate Morphometries. 412 pp. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bokn, T. & Lein, T. E., 1978. Long-term changes in fucoid association of the inner Oslofjord, Norway. Norwegian Journal of Botany, 25, 9–14.Google Scholar
Bolwell, G. P., Callow, J. A., Callow, M. E. & Evans, L. V., 1977. Cross-fertilisation in fucoid seaweeds. Nature, London, 268, 626–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börgesen, F., 1902. Marine algae. Botany of the Faeröes, 2, 339–532, plates XIII-XXIV.Google Scholar
Börgesen, F., 1905. The algae-vegetation of the Faeroëse coasts, with remarks on the phyto-geography. Botany of the Faeröes, 3, 683–834.Google Scholar
Burrows, E. M., Conway, E., Lodge, S. M. & Powell, H. T., 1954. The raising of intertidal algal zones on Fair Isle. Journal of Ecology 42, 283—288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrows, E. M. & Lodge, S., 1951. Autecology and the species problem in Fucus. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 30, 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, W., 1863. Fucus distichus Linn, as an Irish plant. Journal of Botany, British and Foreign, 1, 353–355 + Plate 12.Google Scholar
Carruthers, W., 1864. Note on the Kilkee Fucus. Journal of Botany, British and Foreign, 2, 54.Google Scholar
Chapman, A. R. O., 1972. Morphological variation and its taxonomic implications in the lingulate members of the genus Desmarestia occurring on the west coast of North America. Syesis, 5, 1–20.Google Scholar
Darwin, C., 1859. The Origin of Species, 6th edition. 592 pp. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, P. H. & Heywood, V. H., 1963. Principles of Angiosperm Taxonomy. 556 pp. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Dixon, W. J. (ed.), 1981. BMDP Statistical Software, x, 726 pp. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dobzhanzky, T., 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. 364 pp. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Edelstein, J., Greenwell, M., Bird, C. J. & Mclachlan, J., 1971. Investigations of the marine algae of Nova Scotia. X. Distribution of Fucus serratus L. and some other species of Fucus in the Maritime provinces. Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science, 27, 33–42.Google Scholar
Emerson, A. E., 1945. Taxonomic categories and population genetics. Entomology News, 56,14–19.Google Scholar
Farlow, W. G., 1881. The Marine Algae of New England and Adjacent Coast. Reprinted from Report U.S. Commercial Fisheries for 1879. 210 pp. +15 plates. Appendix A-1. Washington.Google Scholar
Gardner, N. L., 1922. The genus Fucus on the Pacific coast of North America. University of California Publications in Botany, 10, 1–180 + 60 plates.Google Scholar
Gmelin, S. G., 1768. Historia Fucorum. 239 pp. +34 plates. Petropoli.Google Scholar
Guiry, M. D., 1978. A concensus and bibliography of Irish seaweeds. Bibliotheca phycologia, 44, 283 pp.Google Scholar
Hudson, W., 1762. Flora Anglica. xv, 506 pp. London.Google Scholar
Hull, C. H. & Nie, N. H. (ed.), 1981. SPSS Update 7–9. xxi, 402 pp. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Jaasund, E., 1965. Aspects of the marine algal vegetation of northern Norway. Botanica gothoburgensia, 4, 174 pp.Google Scholar
Jolicoeur, P. & Mosimann, J. E., 1960. Size and shape variation in the painted turtle. A principal component analysis. Growth, 24, 339–354.Google Scholar
Jonsson, H., 1903. The marine algae of Iceland. II. Phaeophyceae. Botanisk Tidsskrift, 25, 141–195.Google Scholar
Kenchington, T. J. 1984. Population Structures and Management of the Redfishes (Sebastes spp.: Scorpaenidae) of the Scotian Shelf. Ph.D. Thesis, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.Google Scholar
Kjellman, F. R., 1883. The algae of the Arctic Sea. Kungliga Svenska vetenskapsakademiens handlingar, 20(5), 350 pp. + 31 plates.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. R., 1964. The Ecology of Rocky Shores, xii, 323 pp. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1737. Flora Lapponica, 1st edition. 372 pp. Amstelaedami.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1753. Species Plantarum, 1st edition. Vol. 2, 561–1200 pp. Holmiae.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1767. Systema Naturae, 12th edition. 736 pp. Holmiae.Google Scholar
Mcglade, J. M., 1980. Genotypic and Phenotypic Variation in the Brook Trout, Salvelinus fontinalis (Mitchill). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Guelph, Canada.Google Scholar
Mayr, E., 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. 797 pp. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E., 1969. Principles of Systematic Zoology. 428 pp. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Munda, I. M., 1976. Some aspect of the benthic algal vegetation of the south Icelandic coastal area. Bulletin. Research Institute Neori As, Hverageroi, Iceland, no. 25, 69 pp.Google Scholar
Munda, I. M., 1977 a. Combined effects of temperature and salinity on growth rates of germlings of three Fucus species from Iceland, Helgoland, and the North Adriatic Sea. Helgoländer wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 29, 302–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munda, I. M., 1977 b. The benthic algal vegetation of the island of Grimsey (Eyjafjaroarsysla, North Iceland). Bulletin. Research Institute Nedri As, Hverageroi, Iceland, no. 28, 69 pp.Google Scholar
Munda, I. M., 1980 a. Survey of the benthic algal vegetation of the Borgarfjördur, southwest Iceland. Nova Hedwigia, 32, 855—927.Google Scholar
Munda, I. M., 1980 b. Contribution to the knowledge of the benthic algal vegetation of the Myrar area (Faxafloi, southwest Iceland). Bulletin. Research Institute Nedri As, Hverageroi, Iceland, no. 33, 48 pp.Google Scholar
Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K. & Bent, D. H., 1975. SPSs Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, xxiv, 675 pp. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Oeder, G. C. (ed.), 1767. Flora Danica, vol. 2, part 6. 10 pp. Hafniae.Google Scholar
Pollock, E. G., 1969. Interzonal transplantation of embryos and mature plants of Fucus. Proceedings of the International Seaweed Symposium, 6, 345–356.Google Scholar
Powell, H. T., 1957 a. Studies in the genus Fucus L. I. Fucus distichus L. emend. Powell. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 36, 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, H. T., 1957 b. Studies in the genus Fucus L. II. Distribution and ecology of forms of Fucus distichus L. emend. Powell in Britain and Ireland. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 36, 663–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, H. T., 1963. Speciation in the genus Fucus L. and related genera. In Speciation in the Sea (ed. Harding, J. P. and Tebble, N.), pp. 63–77. London. [Systematics Association Publication no. 5.]Google Scholar
Pylaie, A. J. M. B. De La, 1829. Flora de Terre-Neuve et des lies Saint Pierre et Miclon 128 pp. Paris.Google Scholar
Rice, E. L. 1983. A Numerical Taxonomic Study of Fucus distichus L. emend. Powell. M.Sc. Thesis, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.Google Scholar
Rosenvinge, L. K., 1893. Grenlands Havalger. Meddelelser om Grønland, 3, 763–981 + 2 plates.Google Scholar
Russell, G., 1974. Fucus distichus communities in Shetland. Journal of Applied Ecology, 11, 679–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, S., 1945. A Catalogue of the Linnaean Herbarium. 226 pp. Linnaean Society. London:Google Scholar
Schnell, G. D., 1970. A phenetic study of the suborder Lari (Aves). I. Methods and results of principal components analyses. Systematic Zoology, 19, 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setchell, W. A. & Gardner, N. L., 1903. Algae of northwestern America. University of California Publications in Botany, 1, 165—419.Google Scholar
Setchell, W. A. & Gardner, N. L., 1925. The marine algae of the Pacific coast of North America. Part III. Melanophyceae. University of California Publications in Botany, 8 (3), 383–898 + plates 34–107.Google Scholar
Sideman, E. J. & Mathieson, A. C., 1983. The growth, reproductive phenology and longevity of non-tide-pool Fucus distichus (L.) Powell in New England. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 68, 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneath, P. H. A. & Sokal, P. R., 1973. Numerical Taxonomy, xv, 573 pp. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J., 1969. Biometry. 776 pp. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Stafleu, F. A., Demoulin, V., Greuter, W., Hiepko, P., Linczevski, I. A., Mcvaugh, R., Meikle, R. D., Rollins, R. C., Ross, R., Schopt, J. M. & Voss, E. G., 1978. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, xiv, 457 pp. Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema and Holkema.Google Scholar
Stafleu, R. A. & Cowan, R. S., 1976. Taxonomic Literature, vol. 1. 1135 pp. Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema and Holkema.Google Scholar
Sundene, O., 1953. The algal vegetation of Oslofjord. Skrifter utgitt av det Norske videnskapsakademi i Oslo. I. Matematisk-naturvidenskapelig Klasse, no. 2, 244 pp.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. R., 1957. Marine Algae of the Northeastern Coast of North America, 2nd edition, ix, 509 pp. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Widdowson, T. B., 1971. A statistical analysis of variation in the brown alga Alaria. Syesis, 4, 125–143.Google Scholar
Zinova, A. D., 1953. (Classification of Brown Algae of the Northern Seas of the U.S.S.R.) 225 pp. Moscow: U.S.S.R. Academy of Sciences Botanical Institute. [In Russian.] [Cited by Powell, 1957a.]Google Scholar