Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-688nx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-08T00:36:40.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Animism, personhood and the nature of reality: Sami perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2009

Elina Helander-Renvall
Elina Helander-Renvall*
Affiliation:
Arctic Centre, University of Lapland, PO Box 122, FI-96101 Rovaniemi, Finland (ehelande@ulapland.fi)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is an exploration and description of the inter-subjective character of human and non-human relationships. Recent research into animism shows that at present there is emerging a new ontology that breaks down barriers between human beings and animals, culture and nature. This new animism predominantly discusses how human persons relate to the world. The culture of many indigenous groups is animistic meaning that nature is alive and there is a social space for humans and non-humans to interrelate to each other. In this article, an attempt is made to describe in detail how Sami reindeer herders perceive their environment and how the interplay and dialogue with nature is integrated in the overall activities of Sami within this relationship.

A living being co-exists within certain environmental conditions and is dependent on all other beings with which she/he is in relationship. In this sense one can speak about ‘inter-subjectivity’ meaning direct subject-to-subject sharing of presence. It will be shown that the relationship between humans and non-humans is highly context-bound. Furthermore, the relationship between humans and non-humans within the Sami cultural circles is based on the mutual caretaking, respect and conditioning within different groups. For instance, the reindeer give themselves to humans and humans give shelter to them. According to the Sami world view, there are many different kinds of persons, such as humans, animals and spirits. To be a person in an animistic sense is a very flexible way of existence and one has to learn to know what the different personhoods are about. In this context, it is important to understand the role and function of the landscape and certain places and features within the landscape in specific areas. This is because within these places, communication, and what will be referred to as mythic discourse, takes place between humans and non-humans, and this dialogue is known to be of benefit to human beings in their daily lives and activities.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , January 2010 , pp. 44 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abram, D. 1996. The spell of the sensuous. Perception and language in a more-than-human-world. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Åhren, I. 1988. Det samiska rummet [The Sami place]. In: Fjellheim, S. (editor). Åarjel-saemieh. Samer i sör [Southern Sami. Sami in the south]. Bodö: Offset Nord A/S: 117–22.Google Scholar
Åhrén, J. 1963. En same berättar. Sant, saga och sägen av Jonas Åhrén [A Sami speaks: truth, story and legend by Jonas Åhren]. Östersund: Bokmalens förlag.Google Scholar
Aikio, A., and Aikio, S.. 1978. Girdinoaiddi bárdni. Sápmelas máidnasat [The son of the flying shaman. Sami stories]. Porvoo: Werner Söderström Osakeyhtiö.Google Scholar
Bäckman, L. 1975. Sájva. Föreställningar om hjälp- och skyddsväsen i heliga fjäll bland samerna [Sájva: conceptions of guardian spirits among the Lapps]. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Bäckman, L. 1982. The Noajdie and his ecstasy. A contribution to the discussion. In: Holm, N.G. (editor). Religious ecstasy. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International (papers read at the symposium on religious ecstasy held at Turku, Finland, 26–28 August 1981): 122–127.Google Scholar
Bäckman, L. 1983. Förfäderskult. En studie i samernas förhållande till sina avlidna [Ancestor cults: a study on the relationship of the Sami to their deceased ones]. Lasta. Tidskrift utgiven av Samiska forskarsamfundet 1: 11–48.Google Scholar
Bäckman, L. 2000. Björnen i Samisk tradition [The bear in the Sami tradition]. In: Svanberg, I., and Túnon, H. (editors). Samisk etnobiologi. Människor, djur och växter i norr [Sami ethnobiology: humans, animals and plants in the north]. Falun: Nya Doxa: 216–226.Google Scholar
Basso, K.H. 1996. Wisdom sits in places. Landscape and language among the western Apache. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Bird-David, N. 2002. ‘Animism’ revisited: personhood, environment, and relational epistemology. In: Harvey, G. (editor). Readings in indigenous religions. London: Continuum: 72–105.Google Scholar
Bornstein, A. 2002. Den Samiska Vandringsrösten: jag är kunskapen [The Sami wanderer's voice: I am the knowledge]. Stockholm: Svenska Förlaget.Google Scholar
Brody, H. 1987. Living Arctic. Hunters of the Canadian north. Vancouver, Toronto: Douglas and McIntyre.Google Scholar
Casey, E.S. 1996. How to get from space to place in a fairly short stretch of time: phenomenological prolegomena. In: Feld, S., and Basso, K.. Senses of place. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press: 13–52.Google Scholar
Davidson-Hunt, I., and Berkes, F.. 2003. Learning as you journey: Anishinaabe perception of socialecological environments and adaptive learning. Conservation ecology 8 (1): 5. URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol8/iss1/art5/ (accessed 8 January 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Quincey, C. 2000. Deep spirit: the promise of integralism – a critical appreciation of Ken Wilber's integral psychology. Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (11/12): 177–208.Google Scholar
Descola, P., and Pálsson, G. (editors). 1996. Nature and society. Anthropological perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Drake, S. 1979. Västerbottens Lapparna [The Lapps in Västerbotten]. Umeå: Två Bokförläggare Bokförlag.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. 1915. The elementary forms of religious life. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Edsman, C.-M. 1994. Jägaren och makterna. Samiska och finska björnceremonier [The hunter and the powers. Sami and Finnish bear ceremonials]. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wikselll Tryckeri Uppsala (Dialekt- och folkminnesarkivet).Google Scholar
Eira Buljo, K.M. 2002. Mu kultureanadagat [My cultural landscapes]. In: Andersen, S. (editor). Samiske landskap og Agenda 21 -Kultur, naering, miljövern og demokrati [Sami landscape and Agenda 21 -Culture, economy, environmental protection and democracy]. Guovdageaidnu: Sámi Instituhtta: 136–149.Google Scholar
Eriksson, J.I. 1987. Samisk shamanism [Sami shamanism]. Stockholm: Gimle.Google Scholar
Eriksson, J.I. 2001. Blodstämmare, handpåläggare: Folklig läkekonst och magi i Tornedalen och Lappland [Bloodstaunchers, healers with hands: folk healing and magic in Tornevalley and Lapland]. Umeå: H:ström-Text and Kultur.Google Scholar
Fellman, J. 1978. Anteckningar under min vistelse i Lappmarken [Notes from my visit to Lapland]. Stockholm: Rabén and Sjögren (first published 1844).Google Scholar
Fienup-Riordan, A. 1990. Eskimo essays. Yup'ik lives and how we see them. New Brunswick and London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Fjellström, P. 1755. Kort Berättelse om Lapparnas Björna-fänge samt Deras der wid brukade widskepelser [A short account of the bear hunt of the Lapps and their superstitions]. Stockholm: Wildiska Tryckeriet.Google Scholar
Fjellström, P. 1985. Samernas samhälle i tradition och nutid [Sami traditional and contemporary society]. Stockholm: Nordstedts.Google Scholar
Gaski, H. 1985. Björnen förstår ikke metaforer [The bear does not understand metaphors]. Tidsskrift for nordnorsk natur og kultur 5 (156): 20–23.Google Scholar
Gjessing, G. 1953. Sjamanistisk og laestadiansk ekstase hos samene [Shamanic and Laestadian ecstasy among the Sami]. Oslo: Studia Septentrionalia.Google Scholar
Guthrie, S.E. 1997. The origin of an illusion. In: Glazier, S.D. (editor). Anthropology of religion. A handbook. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press: 489–504.Google Scholar
Haila, Y. 2003. “Erämaa’ ja ympäristöajattelun moniulotteisuus [‘Wilderness’ and the multidimensionality of environmental thinking]. In: Haila, Y., and Lähde, V. (editors). Luonnon politiikka. Tampere: Vastapaino: 174–204.Google Scholar
Hallowell, A.I. 2002. Ojibwa ontology, behaviour, and world view. In: Harvey, G. (editor). Readings in indigenous religions. London: Continuum: 17–49.Google Scholar
Harvey, G. (editor). 2002. Readings in indigenous religions. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Harvey, G. 2006. Animism: respecting the living world. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Heikkilä, L. 2004. Sami reindeer herding confronted with modern environmental management. In: Andreasen, L.M. (editor). Samiske landskapsstudier. Rapport fra et arbeidsseminar [Sami landscape studies. A report from a workshop]. Guovdageaidnu: Sámi Instituhtta: 138–152.Google Scholar
Helander, E. 1999. Sami subsistence activities. Spatial aspects and structuration. Acta Borealia. A Nordic Journal of Circumpolar Societies 16 (2): 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helander, E. 2001. Samiska rättsuppfattningar i Tana [Sami customary law in Tana]. In: Norges offentlige utredninger. Samiske sedvaner og rettsoppfatninger, bakgrunnsmateriale for samerettsutvalget. [Norway's state investigations. Sami customs and customary law, background material for the state commission of Sami rights]. NOU 2001: 34. 425–458.Google Scholar
Helander-Renvall, E. 2007. Traditional ecological knowledge, snow and Sami reindeer herding. In: Knowledge and power in the Arctic. Rovaniemi: University of Lapland (Arctic reports 48): 87–99.Google Scholar
Helander-Renvall, E. 2008. Váisi, the sacred wild: transformation and dreaming in the Sami cultural context. In: Kailo, K. (editor). Wo(men) and bears. The gifts of nature, culture and gender revisited. Toronto: Inanna Publications and Education Inc: 314–338.Google Scholar
Helander-Renvall, E. 2009. Beyond the pale: locating sea Sami women outside the official fisheries discourse in northern Norway. In: Kafarowski, J. (editor). Gender, culture and northern fisheries. Calgary: University of Alberta, Canadian Circumpolar Institute (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Helander, E., and Kailo, K. (editors). 1998. No beginning, no end: the Sami speak up. Alberta/Kautokeino: The Canadian Circumpolar Institute/Nordic Sami Institute.Google Scholar
Inga, B. 2008. Traditional ecological knowledge among the reindeer herders in northern Sweden. Licentiate thesis. Umeå: Swedish University of Agricultural Studies.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 1988. What is an animal? London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 1992. Culture and the perception of an environment. In: Croll, E. and Parkin, D. (editors). Bush base-forest farm: culture, environment and development. New York: Routledge: 39–56.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 1995. ‘People like us’: the concept of anatomically modern human. Cultural Dynamics 7 (2): 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. 1996. Hunting, gathering and the environment. In: Ellen, R., and Fukui, K. (editors). Redefining nature: ecology, culture and domestication. Oxford: Berg: 117–155.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2000. The perception of the environment. Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Irwin, L. 1994. The dream seekers: native American visionary traditions of the Great Plains. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Itkonen, T.I. 1948. Suomen lappalaiset vuoteen 1945 [The Lapps of Finland until 1945]. Vol. 2. Porvoo: Werner Söderström Osakeyhtiö.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. 1998. Minima Ethnographica: intersubjectivity and the anthropological project. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jentoft, S., Minde, H., and Nilsen, R. (editors). 2003. Indigenous peoples. Resource management and global rights. Delft: Eburon Delft.Google Scholar
Jernsletten, J. 2002. Sörsamisk landskapsforståelse i et religionsvitenskapelig perspektiv [South Sami landscape understanding from the perspective of religion]. In: Andersen, S. (editor). Samisk landskap og Agenda 21. Kultur, nearing, miljövern og demokrati [Sami landscape and Agenda 21. Culture, economy, environmental protection and democracy]. Guovdageaidnu: Sámi Instituhtta: 107–114.Google Scholar
Jernsletten, J. 2004. Landskap som tekst og handlende subjekt [Landscape as text and acting subject]. In: Andreassen, L.M. (editor). Samiske landskapsstudier. Rapport fra et arbeidsseminar [Sami landscape studies. A report from a workshop]. Guovdageaidnu: Sámi Instituhtta: 46–57.Google Scholar
Kailo, K. (editor). 2008. Wo(men) and bears. The gifts of nature, culture and gender revisited. Toronto: Inanna Publications and Education Inc.Google Scholar
Kremer, J.W. 2008. Bearing obligations. In: Kailo, K. (editor). Wo(men) and bears. The gifts of nature, culture and gender revisited. Toronto: Inanna Publications and Education Inc: 145–198.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 1998. An actor network theory: a few clarifications. Keele: University of Keele, Centre for Social Theory and Technology (CSTT). URL: www.netline.org (accessed 11 October 2007).Google Scholar
Law, J. 1999. After ANT: complexity, naming and topology. In: Law, J., and Hassard, J. (editors). Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 1–14.Google Scholar
Lehtelä, H. 2007. Representations of the Sámi photojournalism. Who has the knowledge and the power? In: Knowledge and power in the Arctic. Rovaniemi: University of Lapland (Arctic reports 48): 113–118.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1963. Totemism. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Massey, D., and Jess, P. (editors). 2000. A place in the world? Places, cultures and globalization. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.Google Scholar
Mathisen, S.R. 2004. Hegemonic representations of Sámi culture. From narratives of noble savages to discourses. In: Siikala, A.-L., Klein, B., and Mathiesen, S.R. (editors). Creating diversities. Folklore, religion and the politics of heritage. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society: 17–30.Google Scholar
Meyer, L.N., and Ramirez, T.. 1996. ‘Wakinyan horan’ – The thunderbeings call out: the inscrutability of Lakota/Dakota metaphysics. In: O'Meara, S., and West, D.A. (editors). From our eyes: learning from indigenous peoples. Toronto: Garamond Press: 89–105.Google Scholar
Minh-ha, T.T. 1989. Woman, native, other: writing postcoloniality and feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.W. 2003. Subjectivity and self-recognition in animals. In: Leary, M.R., and Tangney, J.P. (editors). Handbook of self and identity. New York: Guilford Press: 567–593.Google Scholar
Mustonen, T., and Salin, T.. 2004. In memory of Aslak Aikio [1931–2004]. A hunter, elder, father, friend, a person of knowledge. In: Helander, E., and Mustonen, T. (editors). Snowscapes, dreamscapes. Snowchange book on community voices of change. Tampere: Tampere Polytechnic Publications: 310–317.Google Scholar
Myrhaug, M-L. 1997. I Modergudinnens Fotspor. Samisk religion med vekt på kvinnelige kultutövere og gudinnekult [Following the mothergoddess: Sami religion with particular relation to the female bear and goddess cults]. Oslo: Pax Forlag A/S.Google Scholar
Nadasdy, P. 1999. The politics of TEK: power and the ‘integration'of knowledge. Arctic Anthropology 36 (1–2): 1–18.Google Scholar
Nadasdy, P. 2007. The gift in the animal: the ontology of hunting and human-animal society. American Ethnologist 34 (1): 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R.K. 1983. Make prayers to the raven: a Koyukon view of the northern forest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nergård, J.-I. 2006. Den levande erfaring: En studie i samisk kunskapstradisjon [The living experience: A study on Sami knowledge tradition]. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Norberg-Schultz, C. 1971. Existence, space and architecture. London: Studio Vista.Google Scholar
Norlander-Unsgaard, S. 1985. On gesture and posture, movements and motion in Saami bear ceremonialism. In: Bäckman, L., and Hultkrantz, A. (editors). Saami pre-christian religion: studies on the oldest traces of religion among the Saamis. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International: 189–199.Google Scholar
Nuttall, M. 1992. Arctic homeland: kinship, community and development in northwest Greenland. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Oskal, N. 1995. Det rette, det gode og reinlykken [Good, bad and reindeer luck]. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Tromsø.: Universitetet i Tromsø., Institutt for Samfunnsvitenskap.Google Scholar
Outakoski, N. 1991. Lars Levi Laestadiuksen saarnojen maahiskuva [Picture of the undergrounds spirits in the sermons of Lars Levi Laestadius]. Oulu: Oulun historiaseuran julkaisuja.Google Scholar
Pentikäinen, J. 2007. Golden king of the forest: the lore of the northern bear. Saarijärvi: Etnika Oy.Google Scholar
Pirak, L. 1983. Nåjden Pirak [Pirak, a shaman]. Norrländsk kulturtidskrift 5: 59–62.Google Scholar
Reed, E.S. 1988. The affordances of the animate environment: social science from the ecological point of view. In: Ingold, T. (editor). What is an animal? London: Unwin Hyman: 110–126.Google Scholar
Relph, E. 1976. Place and placelessness. London: Pion Limited.Google Scholar
Ridington, R. 1988. Knowledge, power, and the individual in subarctic hunting societies. American Anthropologist 90: 98–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochon, T. 1993. Saami and Dene concepts of nature. Umeå: Umeå University, Centre for Arctic Research.Google Scholar
Rockwell, D. 1991. Giving voice to bear. North American Indian rituals, myths, and images of the bear. Toronto: Roberts Rinehart Publishers.Google Scholar
Ruong, I. 1937. Fjällapparna i Jukkasjärvi socken [Mountain Lapps in the Jukkasjärvi parish]. Uppsala: Appelbergs Boktryckeriaktiebolag. (Geographica. skrifter från Uppsala universitetets geografiska institution 3).Google Scholar
Sammallahti, P. 1993. Sámi-Suoma-Sámi Sátnegirji [Sami-Finnish-Sami dictionary]. Ohcejohka: Girjegiisá Oy.Google Scholar
Schefferus, J. 1674. Lapponia [Lappland]. Francofurti: Christian Wolff.Google Scholar
Siikala, A.-L. 1994. Suomalainen Šamanismi [Finnish shamanism]. Hämeenlinna: Karisto Oy.Google Scholar
Sjulsson, K. 1979. Minnen om Vapstenslapparna i början af 1800-talet [Memories of Vapstenlapps at the beginning of the 19th century]. Lund: Berlings (Acta Lapponica 20).Google Scholar
Skott, C. 1997. Bota blod och läka hjärta. Samer berättar om bot [Stop the blood and heal the heart. Sami tell about healing]. Stockholm: Carlsson Bokförlag.Google Scholar
Stordahl, V. 1996. Same i den moderne verden. Endring og kontinuitet i et samisk lokalsamfunn [Sami in the modern world. Change and continuity in a Sami local community]. Karasjok: Davvi Girji OS.Google Scholar
Stoor, K. 2007. Juoiganmuitalusat – Jojkberättelser. En studie av jojkens narrativa egenskaper [Yoik stories. A study on the narrative characteristics of yoiks]. Umeå: Umeå universitet (Sami Studies).Google Scholar
Strathern, M. 1999. What is intellectual property after? In: Law, J., and Hassard, J. (editors). Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers: 156–180.Google Scholar
Tapper, R. 1988. Animality, humanity, morality, society. In: Ingold, T. (editor). What is an animal? London: Unwin Hyman: 47–62.Google Scholar
Therman, E. 1940. Bland noider och nomader [Among shamans and nomads]. Stockholm: Bokförlaget Natur och Kultur.Google Scholar
Thomassen, O. 1999. Lappenes forhold [Lappish conditions]. Kåfjord Kommune: Samisk Språksenter.Google Scholar
Tomasson, T. 1988. Några sägner, seder och bruk, uppteckande efter lapparna i Åsele- och Lycksele lappmark samt Herjedalen sommaren 1917 [Legends, customs and traditions of Lapps in Åsele and Lycksele Lappmark and in Herjedalen during the summer of 1917]. Uppsala: Dialekt-och folkminnesarkivet.Google Scholar
Turi, J. 1987. Muitalus sámiid birra [Book of Lapland]. Jokkmokk: Sámi Girjjit (reprint of 1910 edition).Google Scholar
Turi, J., and Turi, P.. 1920. Lappish texts. Copenhagen: Historisk og filosofisk Afd (Det Kgl. danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Skrifter).Google Scholar
Tylor, E.B. 1958. Primitive culture. I. Religion in primitive culture. New York: Harper and Row (reprint of 1871 edition)Google Scholar
Valkeapää, N.-A. 1994. Nu guhkkin dat mii nu lahka. Så fjernt det naere [So near the far]. Guovdageaidnu: DAT.Google Scholar
Verran, H. 2002. A postcolonial moment in science studies: alternative firing regimes of environmental scientists and aboriginal landowners. Social Studies of Science 32: 729–762.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. 1998. Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4: 469–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E. 2004. Exchanging perspectives: the transformation of objects into subjects in Amerindian ontologies. Common Knowledge 10 (3): 463–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstock, J. 2005. The bear went down the mountain: Sami language usage then and now. Linguistica 45: 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willerslev, R. 2007. Soul hunters. Hunting, animism, and personhood among the Siberian Yukaghirs. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Winkelman, M. 1997. Altered states of consciousness and religious behaviour. In: Glazier, S.D. (editor). Anthropology of religion. A handbook. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press: 394–428.Google Scholar
Wolf, F.A. 1992. The dreaming universe: investigations into the middle realm of consciousness. Gnosis Magazine 92 (Winter): 30–35.Google Scholar