Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-smskv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-28T23:08:58.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of Large and Ultra-Small Δ14C Measurements in Core Top Benthic Foraminifera from the Okhotsk Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

L D Keigwin  and
A R Gagnon
L D Keigwin*
Affiliation:
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 360 Woods Hole Rd., Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA
A R Gagnon
Affiliation:
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 360 Woods Hole Rd., Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA
*
Corresponding author. Email: lkeigwin@whoi.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The radiocarbon activity of benthic foraminifera was investigated in surface sediments from a high deposition rate location at a depth of 1000 m in the Okhotsk Sea. Sediments were preserved and stained with Rose Bengal to identify foraminifera that contain cytoplasm. The benthic fauna at this site is dominated by large specimens of Uvigerina peregrina, and bulk samples (∼150 individuals) of stained and unstained specimens were dated. The stained sample was about 240 14C yr younger than the unstained, and the presence of bomb 14C is inferred by comparison to water column data in the nearby open North Pacific. Using new methods, multiple measurements were also made on samples of three stained and unstained individuals (as small as 7 μg C). Results are consistent with those from the bulk samples. This suggests that similar ultra-small measurements could be made at other locations to reveal the age distribution of individuals in a sediment sample in order to assess the extent of bioturbation and the presence of bomb 14C contamination.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , 2015 , pp. 123 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barker, S, Broecker, W, Clark, E, Hajdas, I. 2007. Radiocarbon age offsets of foraminifera resulting from differential dissolution and fragmentation within the sedimentary bioturbated zone. Paleoceanography 22(2):PA2205, doi:10.1029/2006PA001354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, WH, Heath, GR. 1968. Vertical mixing in pelagic sediments. Journal of Marine Research 26(2):134–43.Google Scholar
Bernhard, J, Ostermann, D, Williams, DS, Blanks, JK. 2006. Comparison of two methods to identify live benthic foraminifera: a test between Rose Bengal and CellTracker Green with implications for stable isotope paleoreconstructions. Paleoceanography 21(4):PA4210, doi:10.1029/2006PA001290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagnon, AR, McNichol, AP, Donoghue, JC, Stuart, DR, von Reden, K, Hayes, JM, Schneider, RJ, Elder, KL, Bellino, M, Long, P, Beaudette, R, Handwork, SK. 2000. The NOSAMS sample preparation laboratory in the next millenium: progress after the WOCE program. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172(1–4):409–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, B. 1969. Vertical dispersal of the Australasian and Ivory Coast microtektite horizons. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 6(6):409–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keigwin, LD. 1996. The Little Ice Age and Medieval Warm Period in the Sargasso Sea. Science 274(5292):1504–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keigwin, LD. 1998. Glacial-age hydrography of the far northwest Pacific Ocean. Paleoceanography 13(4):323–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keigwin, LD, Guilderson, TP. 2009. Bioturbation artifacts in zero-age sediments. Paleoceanography 24(4):PA4212, doi:10.1029/2008PA001727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzmin, Y, Burr, G, Gorbunov, SV, Rakov, VA, Razjigaeva, NG. 2007. A tale of two seas: reservoir age correction values (R, ΔR) for the Sakhalin Island (Sea of Japan and Okhotsk Sea). Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):460–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, S, Key, R. 2002. Separating natural and bomb-produced radiocarbon in the ocean: the potential alkalinity method. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16(4):1105, doi:1110.1029/2001GB001432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah Walter, SR, Gagnon, AR, Roberts, ML, McNichol, AP, Lardie Gaylord, MC, Klein, E. 2015. Ultra-small graphitization reactors for ultra-microscale radiocarbon analysis at the National Ocean Sciences Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (NOSAMS) Facility. Radiocarbon 57(1):109–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talley, LD. 1991. An Okhotsk Sea water anomaly: implications for ventilation in the North Pacific. Deep-Sea Research 38(Supplement 1):S171–S190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talley, LD. 2007. Hydrographic Atlas of the World Ocean Circulation Experiment (WOCE), Pacific Ocean. World Ocean Circulation Experiment (WOCE) Hydrographic Atlas Series. Sparrow, M, Chapman, P, Gould, J, editors. Southampton, UK: National Oceanography Centre.Google Scholar