Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T22:00:17.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Embodied Aesthetics in Auditory Display

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2014

Stephen Roddy  and
Dermot Furlong
Stephen Roddy
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Rep. of Ireland
Dermot Furlong
Affiliation:
Music & Media Technologies, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Rep. of Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aesthetics are gaining increasing recognition as an important topic in auditory display. This article looks to embodied cognition to provide an aesthetic framework for auditory display design. It calls for a serious rethinking of the relationship between aesthetics and meaning-making in order to tackle the mapping problem which has resulted from historically positivistic and disembodied approaches within the field. Arguments for an embodied aesthetic framework are presented. An early example is considered and suggestions for further research on the road to an embodied aesthetics are proposed. Finally a closing discussion considers the merits of this approach to solving the mapping problem and designing more intuitively meaningful auditory displays.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 19 , Special Issue 1: Sonification , April 2014 , pp. 70 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antle, A.N., Corness, G., Bakker, S., Droumeva, M., van den Hoven, E., Bevans, A. 2009. Designing to Support Reasoned Imagination through Embodied Metaphor. In Proceedings of the Conference on Creativity and Cognition. Berkeley, CA: ACM Press, 275–84.Google Scholar
Antle, A.N., Corness, G., Bevans, A. 2011. Springboard: Designing Embodied Schema Based Embodied Interaction for an Abstract Domain. In D. England (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction Series: Whole Body Interaction 2011. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Augst, B. 1965. Descartes's Compendium on Music. Journal of the History of Ideas 26(1): 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrass, S. 2005. A Perceptual Framework for the Auditory Display of Scientific Data. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 2(4): 389–402.Google Scholar
Barrass, S. 2012. The Aesthetic Turn in Sonification Towards a Social and Cultural Medium. AI & Society 27(2): 177–181.Google Scholar
Barrass, S. 2013. ZiZi: The Affectionate Couch and the Interactive Affect Design Diagram. In K. Franinović and S. Serafin (eds.) Sonic Interaction Design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barrass, S., Vickers, P. 2011. Sonification Design and Aesthetics. In T. Hermann, A. Hunt and J.G. Neuhoff (eds.) The Sonification Handbook. Berlin: Logos.Google Scholar
Brand, J., Hailey, C. (eds.) 1997. Constructive Dissonance: Arnold Schoenberg and the Transformations of Twentieth-Century Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brazil, E., Fernström, M. 2006. Investigating Concurrent Auditory Icon Recognition. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Auditory Display, London, UK.Google Scholar
Brazil, E., Fernström, M. 2011. Auditory Icons. In T. Hermann, A. Hunt and J.G. Neuhoff (eds.) The Sonification Handbook. Berlin: Logos.Google Scholar
Bregman, A.S. 1994. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Childs, E. 2002. Achorripsis: A Sonification of Probability Distributions. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Auditory Display, Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
Chion, M. 1994. Audio-Vision: Sound on Screen. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. 2008. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. London: Random House.Google Scholar
Darcy, W.J. 1994. The Metaphysics of Annihilation: Wagner, Schopenhauer, and the Ending of the ‘Ring’. Music Theory Spectrum 16(1): 1–40.Google Scholar
Degara, N., Nagel, F., Hermann, T. 2013. SonEX: An Evaluation Exchange Framework for Reproducible Sonification. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Auditory Display, Lodz, Poland.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. 1647. Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections from the Objections and Replies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1934. Art as Experience. New York: Minton, Balch and Company.Google Scholar
Diniz, N., Deweppe, A., Demey, M., Leman, M. 2010. A Framework for Music-Based Interactive Sonification. In The 16th International Conference on Auditory Display, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Diniz, N., Coussement, P., Deweppe, A., Demey, M., Leman, M. 2012. An embodied Music Cognition Approach to Multilevel Interactive Sonification. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 5(3–4): 211–219.Google Scholar
Dunn, J., Clark, M.A. 1999. Life Music: The Sonification of Proteins. Leonardo 32(1): 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., Turner, M. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. 1987. The Mind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gaver, W.W. 1989. The SonicFinder: An Interface that Uses Auditory Icons. Human-Computer Interaction 4(1): 67–94.Google Scholar
Gaver, W.W. 1993. How Do We Hear in the World? Explorations of Ecological Acoustics. Ecological Psychology 5(4): 285–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goßman, J. 2010. From Metaphor to Medium: Sonification as Extension of our Body. In The 16th International Conference on Auditory Display, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Grant, M.J. 2005. Serial Music, Serial Aesthetics: Compositional Theory in Post-War Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grond, F., Berger, J. 2011. Parameter Mapping Sonification. In T. Hermann, A. Hunt and J.G. Neuhoff (eds.) The Sonification Handbook. Berlin: Logos.Google Scholar
Hampe, B., Grady, J.E. 2005. From Perception to Meaning: Embodied-Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Harnad, S. 1990. The Symbol Grounding Problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 42(1): 335–346.Google Scholar
Hunt, A., Kirk, R. 2000. Mapping Strategies for Musical Performance. In M. Wanderley and M. Battier (eds.) Trends in Gestural Control of Music. Paris: IRCAM – Centre Pompidou.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. 1931. Ideas, trans. W.R. Boyce Gibson. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Imaz, M., Benyon, D. 2007. Designing with Blends: Conceptual Foundations of Human-Computer Interaction and Software Engineering Methods. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 2007. The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, B. 2007. L'Objet Sonore Maintenant: Pierre Schaeffer, Sound Objects and the Phenomenological Reduction. Organised Sound 12(1): 15–24.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1929. Critique of Pure Reason, trans N.K. Smith. New York: St Martin's Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., Espenson, J., Goldberg, A., Schwartz, A. 1991. Master Metaphor List. Manuscript (revised version). Berkeley: Cognitive Linguistics Group, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Leman, M. 2008. Embodied Music: Cognition and Mediation Technology. Cambridge, MA: The Mit Press.Google Scholar
Leplâtre, G., McGregor, I. 2004. How to Tackle Auditory Interface Aesthetics? Discussion and Case Study. In Proceedings of the 10th Meeting of the International Conference on Auditory Display, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Maes, P.J., Leman, M., Lesaffre, M. 2010. A Model-Based Sonification System for Directional Movement Behavior. In Proceedings of the 3rd Interactive Sonification Workshop, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Magee, B. 1999. Confessions of a Philosopher: A Personal Journey through Western Philosophy from Plato to Popper. London: Random House.Google Scholar
McGilchrist, I. 2009. The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McKinnon, D. 2013. Dead Silence: Ecological Silencing and Environmentally Engaged Sound Art. Leonardo Music Journal 23.Google Scholar
Neuhoff, J.G. (ed.) 2004. Ecological Psychoacoustics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Neuhoff, J.G., Heller, L.M. 2005. One Small Step: Sound Sources and Events as the Basis for Auditory Graphs. In Proceedings of the 11th Meeting of the International Conference on Auditory Display, Limerick, Ireland.Google Scholar
O'Callaghan, C. 2010. Sounds and Events. In C. O'Callaghan and M. Nudds (eds.) Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, M. 2001. Research Set to Music: The Climate Symphony and Other Sonifications of Ice Core, Radar, DNA, Seismic, and Solar Wind Data. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Auditory Display, Espoo, Finland.Google Scholar
Roads, C. 1996. The Computer Music Tutorial. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Roddy, S., Furlong, D. 2013a. Embodied Cognition in Auditory Display. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Auditory Display, Lodz, Poland.Google Scholar
Roddy, S., Furlong, D. 2013b. Rethinking the Transmission Medium in Live Computer Music. Paper presented at the third Irish Sound Science and Technology Convocation. Available at: www.researchgate.net/publication/256473641_Rethinking_the_Transmission_Medium_in_Live_Computer_Music_Performance/file/60b7d522f0f830f85c.pdf Google Scholar
Rosch, E. 1999. Principles of Categorization. In E. Margolis and S. Laurence (eds.) Concepts: Core Readings. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, A. 1884. The World as Will and Representation, Vol. 1, trans. E.F.J. Payne. New York: Dover, 1969.Google Scholar
Searle, J.R. 2004. Mind: A Brief Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steels, L. 2008. The Symbol Grounding Problem Has Been Solved. So What's Next? In M. de Vega (ed.) Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Terrugi, D. 2007. Technology and Musique Concrète: The Technical Developments of the Groupe de Recherches Musicales and Their Implication in Musical Composition. Organised Sound 12(3): 213–231.Google Scholar
Todes, S. 2001. Body and World. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tolentino, L., Birchfield, D., Megowan-Romanowicz, C., Johnson-Glenberg, M.C., Kelliher, A., Martinez, C. 2009. Teaching and Learning in the Mixed-Reality Science Classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology 18(6): 501–507.Google Scholar
Uttal, W.R. 2004. Dualism: The Original Sin of Cognitivism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Varela, F.J., Thompson, E.T., Rosch, E. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vickers, P., Hogg, B. 2006. Sonification Abstraite/Sonification Concrète: An ‘Aesthetic Perspective Space’ for Classifying Auditory Displays in the Ars Musica Domain. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Auditory Display, London, UK.Google Scholar
Wakkary, R., Hatala, M., Lovell, R., Droumeva, M. 2005. An Ambient Intelligence Platform for Physical Play. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Singapore, 764–73.Google Scholar
Walker, B.N., Kramer, G. 2004. Ecological Psychoacoustics and Auditory Displays: Hearing, Grouping, and Meaning Making. In J. Neuhoff (ed.) Ecological Psychoacoustics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Walker, B.N., Kramer, G. 2005. Mappings and Metaphors in Auditory Displays: An Experimental Assessment. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 2(4): 407–12.Google Scholar
Walker, B.N., Nees, M.A. 2011. Theory of Sonification. In T. Hermann, A. Hunt and J.G. Neuhoff (eds.) The Sonification Handbook. Berlin: Logos.Google Scholar
Worrall, D. 2010. Parameter Mapping Sonic Articulation and the Perceiving Body. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Auditory Display, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Worrall, D. 2011. A Method for Developing an Improved Mapping Model for Data Sonification. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Auditory Display, Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
Worrall, D. 2013. Understanding the Need for Micro-Gestural Inflections in Parameter-Mapping Sonification. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Auditory Display, Lodz, Poland.Google Scholar
Xenakis, I. 1985. Arts/Sciences: Alloys. New York: Pendragon Press.Google Scholar
Zbikowski, L.M. 2005. Conceptualizing Music: Cognitive Structure, Theory, and Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zbikowski, L.M. 2012. Music and Movement: A View from Cognitive Musicology. In S. Schroedter (ed.) Bewegungen zwischen Hören und Sehen: Denkbewegungen über Bewegungskünste. Würzburg: Königshausen and Neumann.Google Scholar