Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T12:25:44.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Linear electromagnetic inverse scattering via generative adversarial networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2021

Huilin Zhou
Affiliation:
School of Information Engineering, Nanchang University, 999 Xuefu Avenue, Honggutan New District, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
Huimin Zheng
Affiliation:
School of Information Engineering, Nanchang University, 999 Xuefu Avenue, Honggutan New District, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
Qiegen Liu
Affiliation:
School of Information Engineering, Nanchang University, 999 Xuefu Avenue, Honggutan New District, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
Jian Liu
Affiliation:
School of Information Engineering, Nanchang University, 999 Xuefu Avenue, Honggutan New District, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
Yuhao Wang*
Affiliation:
School of Information Engineering, Nanchang University, 999 Xuefu Avenue, Honggutan New District, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
*
Author for correspondence: Yuhao Wang, E-mail: wangyuhao@ncu.edu.cn

Abstract

Electromagnetic inverse-scattering problems (ISPs) are concerned with determining the properties of an unknown object using measured scattered fields. ISPs are often highly nonlinear, causing the problem to be very difficult to address. In addition, the reconstruction images of different optimization methods are distorted which leads to inaccurate reconstruction results. To alleviate these issues, we propose a new linear model solution of generative adversarial network-based (LM-GAN) inspired by generative adversarial networks (GAN). Two sub-networks are trained alternately in the adversarial framework. A linear deep iterative network as a generative network captures the spatial distribution of the data, and a discriminative network estimates the probability of a sample from the training data. Numerical results validate that LM-GAN has admirable fidelity and accuracy when reconstructing complex scatterers.

Type
Radar
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ireland, D, Bialkowski, K and Abbosh, A (2013) Microwave imaging for brain stroke detection using Born iterative method. IET Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation 7, 909915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmeri, R, Bevacqua, MT, Crocco, L, Isernia, T and Donato, LD (2017) Microwave imaging via distorted iterated virtual experiments. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 65, 829838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G, Stang, J, Haynes, M, Leuthardt, E and Moghaddam, M (2018) Real-time three-dimensional microwave monitoring of interstitial thermal therapy. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 65, 528538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, X, Li, M, Yang, F, Xu, S and Abubakar, A (2019) Study on joint inversion algorithm of acoustic and electromagnetic data in biomedical imaging. IEEE Journal on Multiscale and Multiphysics Computational Techniques 4, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monte, LL, Erricolo, D, Soldovieri, F and Wicks, MC (2009) Radio frequency tomography for tunnel detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 48, 11281137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poli, L, Oliveri, G and Massa, A (2012) Microwave imaging within the first-order Born approximation by means of the contrast-field Bayesian compressive sensing. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 60, 28652879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, JD, Van Veen, BD and Hagness, SC (2011) A TSVD analysis of microwave inverse scattering for breast imaging. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 59, 936945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, H, Mo, Z, Wang, Y and Duan, R (2015) Low rank reconstruction algorithm for ground penetrating radar linear inverse imaging. IET International Radar Conference 2015, pp. 14.Google Scholar
Wang, YM and Chew, WC (1989) An iterative solution of the two-dimensional electromagnetic inverse scattering problem. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology 1, 100108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Den Berg, PM and Kleinman, RE (1997) A contrast source inversion method. Inverse Problems 13, 16071620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, LP, Yu, C and Liu, QH (2005) Through-wall imaging (TWI) by radar: 2-D tomographic results and analyses. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 43, 27932798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X (2010) Subspace-based optimization method for solving inverse scattering problems. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 48, 4249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, K, Zhong, Y and Wang, G (2017) A hybrid regularization technique for solving highly nonlinear inverse scattering problems. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 66, 1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertero, M and Boccacci, P (2001) Introduction to inverse problems in imaging. Optics and Photonics News 12, 4647.Google Scholar
Sun, Y, Xia, Z and Kamilov, US (2018) Efficient and accurate inversion of multiple scattering with deep learning. Optics Express 26, 1467814688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, R, Song, X, Li, M, Yang, F, Xu, S and Abubakar, A (2019) Supervised descent learning technique for 2-D microwave imaging. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 67, 35503554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massa, A, Marcantonio, D, Chen, X, Li, M and Salucci, M (2019) DNNs as applied to electromagnetics, antennas, and propagation – a review. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 18, 22252229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caorsi, S and Gamba, P (1999) Electromagnetic detection of dielectric cylinders by a neural network approach. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 37, 820827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rekanos, IT (2002) Neural-network-based inverse scattering technique for online microwave medical imaging. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 38, 10611064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L, Wang, LG, Teixeira, FL, Liu, C, Nehorai, A and Cui, TJ (2019) DeepNIS: deep neural network for nonlinear electromagnetic inverse scattering. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 67, 18191825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, Z and Chen, X (2019) Physics-inspired convolutional neural network for solving full-wave inverse scattering problems. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 67, 61386148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, H, Ouyang, T, Li, Y, Liu, J and Liu, Q (2020) Linear model-inspired neural network for electromagnetic inverse scattering. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 19, 15361540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodfellow, IJ, Pouget-Abadie, J, Mirza, M, Xu, B, Warde-Farley, D, Ozair, S and Bengio, Y (2014) Generative adversarial networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 3, 26722680.Google Scholar
Chen, X, Wei, Z, Li, M and Rocca, P (2020) A review of deep learning approaches for inverse scattering problems. Progress in Electromagnetics Research 167, 6781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chew, WC (1995) Inverse Scattering Problems, in Waves and Fields in Inhomogeneous media. New York, USA: IEEE.Google Scholar
Ledig, C, Theis, L, Huszár, F, Caballero, J, Cunningham, A, Acosta, A and Shi, W (2017) Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA, pp. 105114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronneberger, O, Fischer, P and Brox, T (2015) U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. 2015 18th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), pp. 234241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G, Afshar, S, Tapson, J and Van Schaik, A (2017) EMNIST: extending MNIST to handwritten letters. 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Anchorage, AK, USA, pp. 29212926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, Z and Chen, X (2019) Deep-learning schemes for full-wave nonlinear inverse scattering problems. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 57, 18491860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar