Sex vs Gender: Are We there Yet? A Biological Location for Gender, not Sex.

10 July 2020, Version 2
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

The origins of bodily sex are understood but the origins of gender are not. While gonadal sex and sexual orientation are accepted as emanating from genetic and hormonal templates, gender’s existence currently has so far emanated from either social origins or a nebulous ‘somewhere’ in the brain. Research to date has left unexplained what seems indefinable – gender identity. It is arguable the lack of consensus on the origins of gender per se is problematic for research into gender identity. A physiological location for gender in the human phenotype may help advance this research further. This article synthesizes important research that has not previously presented a case for a biological location of gender in the reproductive axis. Without a consensus for the origins of gender, how can we fully understand gender identity.

Keywords

gender
gender identity
sexuality
gender diversity
sexual identity
identity theory
identity development
identity formation

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.