Sex vs Gender: A biological basis for gender, not sex.

04 April 2022, Version 6
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Definitions of gender most always define it as a person's sense of core self and centered in the brain, but none venture to suggest where in the brain? While bodily sex and sexual orientation are accepted as emanating from genetic and hormonal templates, gender’s existence has so far either emanated from strictly social origins, a nebulous ‘somewhere’ in the brain, some combination of sources, or been rejected outright. We embrace evolutionary principles to examine contemporary research on sex and gender, review differences in neural and endocrine development, differences in the reproductive burden on ciswomen compared to cismen, combined with research into the trans community. We present an understanding based on early stable dimorphic sex differences in cognitive signaling related to the reproductive axis and reproduction. We propose the neural networks associated with these few stable and significant sex-linked behaviors provide a biological template for gender identity rather than sex.

Keywords

gender
gender identity
sexuality
gender diversity
sexual identity
identity theory
identity development
identity formation

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.