Some traditional comparative lawyers denounce postmodern comparative law as being ‘incomprehensible’.1 Indeed, it is often fairly complex. Yet this chapter aims to show that it is possible to make it comprehensible. It also highlights both its strengths and limitations. To start with, Section A explains that ‘postmodernism’ is understood as a wide label for research that challenges the traditional method but does not merely suggest ‘modern’ adjustments.
Review the options below to login to check your access.
Log in with your Cambridge Higher Education account to check access.
If you believe you should have access to this content, please contact your institutional librarian or consult our FAQ page for further information about accessing our content.