Skip to main content Accessibility help
Internet Explorer 11 is being discontinued by Microsoft in August 2021. If you have difficulties viewing the site on Internet Explorer 11 we recommend using a different browser such as Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Apple Safari or Mozilla Firefox.

13th August 2024: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues, however alternative purchasing options are available.
As we resolve the issues resulting from this, we are also experiencing some delays to publication. We are working hard to restore services as soon as possible and apologise for the inconvenience. For further updates please visit our website .

Home
> ECHR, Sixteenth Protocol

Chapter 21: ECHR, Sixteenth Protocol

Chapter 21: ECHR, Sixteenth Protocol

pp. 170-172

Authors

Edited by , University of Helsinki
  • Add bookmark
  • Cite
  • Share

Summary

ETS NO. 214

Concluded: 2 October 2013

Not in force

The member States of the Council of Europe and other High Contracting Parties to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed at Rome on 4 November 1950 (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”), signatories hereto,

Having regard to the provisions of the Convention and, in particular, Article 19 establishing the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as “the Court”);

Considering that the extension of the Court's competence to give advisory opinions will further enhance the interaction between the Court and national authorities and thereby reinforce implementation of the Convention, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity;

Having regard to Opinion No. 285 (2013) adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on 28 June 2013,

Have agreed as follows:

Article 1

  • 1. Highest courts and tribunals of a High Contracting Party, as specified in accordance with Article 10, may request the Court to give advisory opinions on questions of principle relating to the interpretation or application of the rights and freedoms defined in the Convention or the protocols thereto.

  • 2. The requesting court or tribunal may seek an advisory opinion only in the context of a case pending before it.

  • 3. The requesting court or tribunal shall give reasons for its request and shall provide the relevant legal and factual background of the pending case.

  • Article 2

  • 1. A panel of five judges of the Grand Chamber shall decide whether to accept the request for an advisory opinion, having regard to Article 1. The panel shall give reasons for any refusal to accept the request.

  • 2. If the panel accepts the request, the Grand Chamber shall deliver the advisory opinion.

  • 3. The panel and the Grand Chamber, as referred to in the preceding paragraphs, shall include ex officio the judge elected in respect of the High Contracting Party to which the requesting court or tribunal pertains. If there is none or if that judge is unable to sit, a person chosen by the President of the Court from a list submitted in advance by that Party shall sit in the capacity of judge.

  • About the book

    Access options

    Review the options below to login to check your access.

    Purchase options

    eTextbook
    US$23.99
    Paperback
    US$23.99

    Have an access code?

    To redeem an access code, please log in with your personal login.

    If you believe you should have access to this content, please contact your institutional librarian or consult our FAQ page for further information about accessing our content.

    Also available to purchase from these educational ebook suppliers