Skip to main content Accessibility help
Internet Explorer 11 is being discontinued by Microsoft in August 2021. If you have difficulties viewing the site on Internet Explorer 11 we recommend using a different browser such as Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Apple Safari or Mozilla Firefox.

Update 30th September 2024: Our systems are now restored following recent technical disruption, and we’re working hard to catch up on publishing. We apologise for the inconvenience caused. Find out more 

Home
> Breach II – Proving…

Chapter 7: Breach II – Proving Negligence

Chapter 7: Breach II – Proving Negligence

pp. 333-399

Authors

, Queen Mary University of London
Resources available Unlock the full potential of this textbook with additional resources. There are free resources available for this textbook. Explore resources
  • Add bookmark
  • Cite
  • Share

Summary

Breach is doing something which a prudent and reasonable person would not do, or failing to do something which a prudent and reasonable person would do. This definition of breach, adapted from Alderson B’s ‘classic statement’1 in Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Co2 back in 1856, highlights the key question: what would a reasonable person have done differently, to avoid the risk of harm or injury occurring to C? If the answer to that is, ‘nothing’, then breach will fail.

Keywords

  • reasonable foreseeability
  • inevitable accidents
  • quadrant of factors
  • the Bolam test
  • the Bolitho ‘gloss’
  • SARAH Act 2015
  • making it worse
  • res ipsa loquitur

About the book

Access options

Review the options below to login to check your access.

Purchase options

eTextbook
US$62.99
Paperback
US$62.99

Have an access code?

To redeem an access code, please log in with your personal login.

If you believe you should have access to this content, please contact your institutional librarian or consult our FAQ page for further information about accessing our content.

Also available to purchase from these educational ebook suppliers