Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:54:16.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4B - Social Egg Freezing Should Be Available Up To the Age of 40 Years

Against

from Section I - Limits for IVF

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2021

By
Kylie Baldwin
Edited by
Roy Homburg ,
Adam H. Balen  and
Robert F. Casper
Roy Homburg
Affiliation:
Homerton University Hospital, London
Adam H. Balen
Affiliation:
Leeds Centre for Reproductive Medicine
Robert F. Casper
Affiliation:
Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto
Get access

Summary

The last decade has seen a significant increase in the number of egg freezing cycles performed across the world. Often described as a fertility preservation or fertility extension technology, social egg freezing (henceforth SEF) has the potential to allow women to defer childbearing to later in their reproductive lives which can benefit users in a multitude of different ways (Baldwin, 2019). However, there are several reasons we should think twice before recommending such an elective procedure to otherwise healthy women.

Type
Chapter
Information
50 Big Debates in Reproductive Medicine , pp. 22 - 23
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, K. Egg Freezing, Fertility and Reproductive Choice: Negotiating Hope, Responsibility and Modern Motherhood. Emerald: Bingley, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HFEA. Egg Freezing in Fertility Treatment: Trends and Figures 2010–2016. HFEA, 2018.Google Scholar
Daar, J, Benward, J, Collins, L, et al. Planned oocyte cryopreservation for women seeking to preserve future reproductive potential: An ethics committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(6):1022–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, E. The ambiguities of ‘social’ egg freezing and the challenges of informed consent. BioSocieties. 2018;13(1):21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, K, Culley, L. Women’s experience of social egg freezing: Perceptions of success, risks, and ‘going it alone’. Hum Fertil. 2018;1:1–7.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×