Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- Acknowledgments
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Background and methodology
- 2 Authorial data: seams and summaries
- 3 Authorial criteria: Greek prose compositional conventions
- 4 Authorial unity: analysis results and probabilities
- 5 Final considerations and future directions
- Appendix
- Bibliography
- Index of Biblical and Other Ancient Sources
- Index of Modern Authors and Subjects
- References
3 - Authorial criteria: Greek prose compositional conventions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 June 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- Acknowledgments
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Background and methodology
- 2 Authorial data: seams and summaries
- 3 Authorial criteria: Greek prose compositional conventions
- 4 Authorial unity: analysis results and probabilities
- 5 Final considerations and future directions
- Appendix
- Bibliography
- Index of Biblical and Other Ancient Sources
- Index of Modern Authors and Subjects
- References
Summary
Indeed, it is above all necessary to stress today what Streeter once wrote years ago, that Luke “though not, as has been rashly alleged, ‘a great historian’ in the modern sense, is a consummate literary ‘artist’ (The Four Gospels, 548). For he composed his narrative (diēgēsis) not merely as an ancient historian of the Hellenistic mode, nor merely as a theologian of the early church writing in a biblical mold, but also as a conscious littérateur of the Greco-Roman period [emphasis added].
That the style of Luke and Acts was influenced by the literary milieu of the first century is rarely disputed. Scholars point to the preface of Luke (Lk 1:1–4), the author-editor's remarkable stylistic range, or the rhetorical character of the Acts speeches. Hellenistic or κοινή Greek, the vernacular of that era, was used not only on the street or in marketplace transactions but also in literary works whose language and style at times reflect an awareness of a more elevated style of Greek.
Adolf Deissmann defines the term “literature” as “that which is written for the public, or for a public, and which is cast in a definite artistic form.” Deissmann argues that early Christian literature, in which he includes Luke and Acts, was “on the whole, popular literature.” In language, style, and subject matter, he classifies the gospels and Acts as popular and literary, though not professionally literary. Shortly after Deissmann, Henry Cadbury describes the language of Luke and Acts as follows:
Luke's Greek is neither classical Greek nor modern Greek. It is Hellenistic Greek, sometimes called Koine, – the Greek that was employed in the first century when Luke wrote … From extremes of style Luke may certainly be excluded. He is not of the lowest cultural grade on the one hand, nor on the other does he belong with the Atticists of the time, who by rigid rules and conscious imitation attempted to write in a style comparable to that of the classical masters of Greek prose.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Assumed Authorial Unity of Luke and ActsA Reassessment of the Evidence, pp. 90 - 136Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
, The Four Gospels: A Study of Origins, Treating of the Manuscript Tradition, Sources, Authorship, & Dates (London: Macmillan, 1924), p. 548.Google Scholar
, Demetrius: On Style: The Greek Text of Demetrius De elocutione Edited after the Paris Manuscript (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1902)Google Scholar
Dionysius of Halicarnassas: On Literary Composition: Being the Greek Text of the De compositione verborum (London: Macmillan and Co., 1910)
, “The Use of the Greek Language in Acts” in and , Beginnings of Christianity, vol. Ⅱ, pp. 32f
, Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study, trans. , , and (Leiden: Brill, 1998)Google Scholar
, Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period: 330 B. C.–A. D. 400 (Boston, Mass.: Brill Academic Publishers, 2001)Google Scholar
, “Greek Grammar since BDF: A Retrospective and Prospective Analysis,” Filologia Neotestamentaria 4 (1991), 143–164Google Scholar
, “Acts against the Background of Classical Rhetoric” in and (eds.), The Book of Acts in Its Ancient Literary Setting (Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1993).Google Scholar
, “Éléments artistiques dans l’évangile de Luc” in Neirynck, L’Évangile de Luc, pp. 129–140
, “The Appeal and Power of Poetics (Luke 1:1–4)” in Moessner, Jesus and the Heritage of Israel, pp. 84–126
, “Cicero und Lukas: Bemerkungen zu Stil und Zweck der historischen Monographie,” in Verheyden, Unity of Luke-Acts, pp. 759–775
, Acts 6:1–8:4: The Author's Method of Composition, Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 41 (Missoula, Mont.: Scholars Press, 1978)Google Scholar
, “Luke's Second Book and the Rules of Hellenistic Historiography” in Kremer, Les Actes des Apôtres, pp. 37–60
, “Greco-Roman Imitation of Texts as a Partial Guide to Luke's Use of Sources” in (ed.), Luke-Acts: New Perspectives from the Society of Biblical Literature (New York: Crossroad: 1984), pp. 17–46Google Scholar
, “Rhetorical Influences and Genre: Luke's Preface and the Rhetoric of Hellenistic Historiography” in (ed.), Jesus and the Heritage of Israel: Luke's Narrative Claim upon Israel's History (Harrisburg, Pa.: Trinity Press International, 1999), pp. 27–62Google Scholar
, New Light on the New Testament: From Records of the Græco-Roman Period, trans. (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1907), pp. 50f.Google Scholar
, Classical Rhetoric & Its Christian & Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times (Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press, 1999), p. 143.Google Scholar
, (ed.), The Orator in Action & Theory in Greece & Rome: Essays in Honor of George A. Kennedy (Leiden: Brill, 2001)CrossRef
, “The Greek Words for ‘Style’ (with Special Reference to Demetrius περὶ Ἑρμηνείας),” The Classical Review 15 (1901), 252–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt (Princeton, N. J. and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Writing, Teachers, and Students in Graeco-Roman Egypt (Atlanta, Ga.: Scholars Press, 1996)
(ed.), Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity (Leiden: Brill, 2001)
, Teachers and Texts in the Ancient World: Philosophers, Jews and Christians (London: Routledge, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Education in Ancient Israel: Across the Deadening Silence, Anchor Bible Reference Library (New York: Doubleday, 1998)Google Scholar
and (eds.), The Chreia and Ancient Rhetoric: Classroom Exercises (Atlanta, Ga.: Society of Biblical Literature, 2002).
, “The Order of Words in Greek” in Transactions of the American Philological Association 1890, vol. ⅩⅪ (New York: reprint, Johnson Reprint Corporation; Kraus Reprint Corporation, 1964), p. 47.Google Scholar
and (eds.), Ancient Literary Criticism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972)
, The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World: 300 B. C.–A. D. 300 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1972)Google Scholar
A New History of Classical Rhetoric (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994)
and (eds.), Classical Literary Criticism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989)
and , “Poetics and Grammar: From Technique to Τέκνη” in Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle: A Collection of Papers in Honor of D. M. Schenkeveld (Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1995), pp. 17–41.Google Scholar
The Oxford Classical Dictionary, and (eds.), 3rd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. xxix–liv.
, “On Attic Prose Rhythm” in Hermathena: A Series of Papers on Literature, Science, and Philosophy 32 (1906), 18–34Google Scholar
État actuel des études sur le rythme de la prose grecque Ⅱ, Eussup 11 (Lwów: Subventionnée par le Ministère de l'Instruction Publique Société Polon Paris, 1930)Google Scholar
, “Some Statistics on the Order of Words in Greek” in Studies in Honor of Basil L. Gildersleeve (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1902), pp. 229–240Google Scholar
, The “Art” of Rhetoric, trans. , Aristotle, vol. XV, Loeb Classical Library 193 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1926; reprint 1939, 1947, 1959, 1967, 1975, 1982, 1991, 1994, 2000)Google Scholar
, Poetics, trans. (ed.), Aristotle, vol. ⅩⅩⅢ, Loeb Classical Library 199 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995; reprint 1999), pp. 1–141Google Scholar
, “Aristotle on the Period,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 63 (1958), 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, On Style, trans. (ed.), Loeb Classical Library 199 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995; reprint 1999), pp. 309–525Google Scholar
, On Style, trans. (ed.), Loeb Classical Library 199 [Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995; reprint 1999], pp. 312ff.Google Scholar
, Orator, trans. , Loeb Classical Library 342 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
, “Linguistic Theories in the Rhetorical Works of Dionysius of Halicarnassus,” Glotta 61 (1983), 89.Google Scholar
, “Theories of Evaluation in the Rhetorical Treatises of Dionysius of Halicarnassus,” in and (eds.), Museum Philologum Londiniense, vol. I (Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert, 1975).Google Scholar
Dionysius of Halicarnassas: Critical Essays, vol. I, trans. , Loeb Classical Library 465 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1974; reprint, 2000)
and (eds.), Dionysii Halicarnasei Opuscula, 2 vols. (Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner, 1965)
, The Literary Treatises of Dionysius of Halicarnassus: A Study in the Development of Critical Method (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1939), pp. 31ffGoogle Scholar
, “Un critique grec dans la Rome d'Auguste” in (ed.), Principat, vol. II, Part 1, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1982), p. 839.Google Scholar
, On the Sublime, trans. (ed.), rev. Donald Russell, Loeb Classical Library 199 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995; reprint 1999), pp. 143–307Google Scholar
, The Order of Words in the Ancient Languages Compared with that of the Modern Languages, Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, Series 1: Amsterdam Classics in Linguistics, 1800–1925 (Amsterdam: John Benjamins B. V., 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Roman Literary Culture: From Cicero to Apuleius (Baltimore, Md. and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
, Vox Graeca: A Guide to the Pronunciation of Classical Greek, 3rd edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
, The Sound of Greek: Studies in the Greek Theory and Practice of Euphony (Berkeley and Los Angeles, Calif.: University of California Press, 1967), pp. 51–60.Google Scholar
Thucydides: The Peloponnesian War, trans. (Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett Publishing Co., 1998), p. 3.
, Greek Grammar, rev. Gordon M. Messing (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1920, 1956Google Scholar
, “The Importance of Final Syllables in Greek Verse,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 70 (1939), 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Antike Rhythmustheorien: Historische Form und Aktuelle Substanz (Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner, 1989), pp. 25–32Google Scholar
, “Accentual Clausulae in Greek Prose of the First and Second Centuries of our Era,” The American Journal of Philology 29 (1908), 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Glossary of Greek Rhetorical Terms Connected to Methods of Argumentation, Figures and Tropes from Anaximenes to Quintilian (Leuven: Peeters, 2000)Google Scholar
, “The De Compositione of Dionysius of Hall-Carnassus Considered with Reference to the Rhetoric of Aristotle,” Classical Philology 6 (1911), 177f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar