Amerasinghe, C. F., Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organisations, Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law, 2nd rev. edn (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Barriga, S. and Kreß, C. (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Bowett, D. W., Self-Defence in International Law (Manchester University Press, 1958).Google Scholar

Corten, O., The Law Against War. The Prohibition on the Use of Force in Contemporary International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2012).Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 5th edn (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Ferencz, B. B., Defining International Aggression: The Search for World Peace, vol. I (2 vols., Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1975).Google Scholar

Gray, C., International Law and the Use of Force, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Kammerhofer, J., Uncertainty in International Law: A Kelsenian Perspective (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar

Lowe, A. V., International Law (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Dekker, I. F. and Werner, W. G., ‘The Crime of Aggression and the Eritrea–Ethiopia Armed Conflict’, in de Guttry, A., Post, H. H. G. and Venturini, G. (eds.), The 1998–2000 War between Eritrea and Ethiopia: An International Legal Perspective (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser, 2009), 243–58.Google Scholar

Gray, C., ‘The International Court of Justice and the Use of Force’, in Tams, C. J. and Sloan, J. (eds.), The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2013), 237–61.Google Scholar

Hexner, E. P., ‘Teleological Interpretation of Basic Instruments of Public International Organisations’, in Engel, S. and Metall, R. A. (eds.), Law, State and International Legal Order: Essays in Honor of Hans Kelsen (Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press, 1964), 119–38.Google Scholar

Kreß, C., ‘The International Court of Justice and the “Principle of the Non-Use of Force”’, in Weller, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 561–604.Google Scholar

Lowe, A. V. and Tzanakopoulos, A., ‘Humanitarian Intervention’, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. V (10 vols., Oxford University Press, 2012), 47–59.Google Scholar

Broms, B., ‘The Definition of Aggression’, Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international de la Haye, 154 (1977), 236–361.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G. G., ‘The Definition of Aggression: Extracts from Speech Delivered in the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly by the Representative of the United Kingdom, Mr. G. G. Fitzmaurice, C.M.G., on January, 9, 1952’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 1 (1952), 137–44.Google Scholar

Franck, T. M., ‘The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance’, American Journal of International Law, 86 (1992), 46–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hogan-Doran, J. and van Ginkel, B. T., ‘Aggression as a Crime under International Law and the Prosecution of Individuals by the Proposed International Criminal Court’, Netherlands International Law Review, 43 (1996), 321–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreß, C. and von Holtzendorff, L., ‘The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 1179–1217.Google Scholar

O’Connell, M. E. and Niyazmatov, M., ‘What is Aggression? Comparing the Jus ad Bellum and the ICC Statute’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10 (2012), 189–207.Google Scholar

Talmon, S., ‘The Responsibility of Outside Powers for Acts of Secessionist Entities’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 58 (2009), 493–517.Google Scholar

Tams, C. J., ‘The Use of Force against Terrorists’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009), 359–97.Google Scholar

Waldock, C. H. M., ‘The Regulation of the Use of Force by Individual States in International Law’, Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international de la Haye, 81 (1952), 451–517.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Armed Activities case) (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), ICJ Reports (2005), 168.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Oil Platforms case) (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) (Merits), ICJ Reports (2003), 161.Google Scholar

Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua case) (Nicaragua v. United States of America) (Merits), ICJ Reports (1986), 14.Google Scholar

Corfu Channel case (United Kingdom v. Albania) (Merits), ICJ Reports (1949), 4.Google Scholar

Fisheries Jurisdiction (Spain v. Canada) (Preliminary Objections), ICJ Reports (1998), 432.Google Scholar

House of Lords, R v. Jones [2006] UKHL 16.Google Scholar

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Wall case) (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (2004), 136.Google Scholar

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Nuclear Weapons case) (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Reports (1996), 226.Google Scholar

Appellate Body Report, Canada – Certain Measures Affecting the Automotive Industry, WT/DS139/AB/R, WT/DS142/AB/R, adopted 19 June 2000.Google Scholar

Appellate Body Report, Canada – Measures Relating to Exports of Wheat and Treatment of Imported Grain, WT/DS276/AB/R, adopted 27 September 2004.Google Scholar

Appellate Body Report, United States – Measure Affecting Imports of Woven Wool Shirts and Blouses from India, WT/DS33/AB/R, adopted 23 May 1997.Google Scholar

Appellate Body Report, United States – Subsidies on Upland Cotton, WT/DS267/AB/R, adopted 21 March 2005.Google Scholar

Convention between Czechoslovakia, Romania, Turkey, the USSR and Yugoslavia concerning the Definition of Aggression (signed 4 July 1933), 148 LNTS 211.Google Scholar

Convention between the USSR and Lithuania concerning the Definition of Aggression (signed 5 July 1933), 148 LNTS 79.Google Scholar

Draft Act Relating to the Definition of Aggression presented by the Committee on Security Questions to the General Commission of the League of Nations Conference for the Reduction and Limitation of Armaments on 24 May 1933, League Document 1935.IX.4.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts’ (Articles on State Responsibility), Yb ILC (2001), vol. II, part 2, 26, adopted by General Assembly, Responsibility of State for International Wrongful Acts, 28 January 2002, UN Doc. A/RES/56/83.Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Draft Articles on State Responsibility’, Yb ILC (1996), vol. I., 239 (including commentary).Google Scholar

International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg), Judgment, 1 October 1946, American Journal of International Law, 41 (1947), 172.Google Scholar

Treaty of Non-Aggression and Pacific Settlement of Disputes Between Finland and the USSR (signed 21 January 1932), 157 LNTS 393.Google Scholar

Wood, M., ‘Second Report on Identification of International Customary Law, International Law Commission’, UN Doc. A/CN.4/672, 22 May 2014.Google Scholar