Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Glossary
- Abbreviations
- 1 Basics of breast MRI
- 2 Imaging-related anatomy and pathology
- 3 Interpreting breast MRI studies
- 4 MRI-guided biopsy techniques
- 5 High-risk screening using breast MRI
- 6 Preoperative staging with breast MRI
- 7 Problem-solving applications of breast MRI
- 8 MRI after breast augmentation
- Answers to multiple choice questions
- Appendices
- Index
- Plate section
- References
8 - MRI after breast augmentation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Glossary
- Abbreviations
- 1 Basics of breast MRI
- 2 Imaging-related anatomy and pathology
- 3 Interpreting breast MRI studies
- 4 MRI-guided biopsy techniques
- 5 High-risk screening using breast MRI
- 6 Preoperative staging with breast MRI
- 7 Problem-solving applications of breast MRI
- 8 MRI after breast augmentation
- Answers to multiple choice questions
- Appendices
- Index
- Plate section
- References
Summary
Chapter outline
Historical background
Implant types and terminology
Fibrous capsule formation and contracture
The evolution of silicone implants
Normal MRI features of silicone implants
MRI appearances of implant complications
Cancer incidence and detection in women with implants
Tissue breast reconstructive surgery
Augmentation by direct injection procedures
Historical background
Over the last hundred or so years, attempts at breast augmentation have been documented using an astonishing variety of materials including ivory, glass beads, ground rubber, gutta percha and ox cartilage [1]. The range of injectable substances used includes paraffin oil, petroleum jelly, glazier’s putty, beeswax, shellac and epoxy resin [1]. Not surprisingly, complications were frequent, often relating to foreign body reactions with tissue necrosis, fistula formation and infection. With the advent of synthetic polymers, new concepts were trialled in the form of polythene chips, polythene tape or strips wound into a ball-shape, polymer sponges, Terylene wool, silastic rubber and polypropylene string, but none of these materials gave a particularly natural cosmetic effect.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Handbook of Breast MRI , pp. 172 - 188Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
Safety of Silicone Breast ImplantsWashingtonNational Academy Press 2000
Imaging spectrum of extracapsular silicone: correlation of US, MR imaging, mammographic and histopathologic findingsRadioGraphics 1999 19 S39CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reference Manual for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Implants and Devices: 2007 EditionLos Angeles, CABiomedical Research Publishing Group 2007Google Scholar
Infusion port dislodgment of bilateral breast tissue expanders after MRIAnn Plast Surg 2001 46 46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tissue expanders and magnetic resonance imaging: the “hot” breast implantAnn Plast Surg 1995 5 647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polyurethane-coated silicone gel breast implants used for 18 yearsAesthetic Plast Surg 2007 31 330CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast typesPlast Reconstr Surg 2001 107 1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The correction of capsular contracture by conversion to “dual-plane” positioning: technique and outcomesPlast Reconstr Surg 2003 112 456CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Failure of a “highly cohesive implant”: what does it really meanPlast Reconstr Surg 2009 124 323CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MR imaging of breast implants and their complicationsAJR Am J Roentgenol 1996 167 1271CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Complex radial folds versus subtle signs of intracapsular rupture of breast implants: MR findings with surgical correlationAJR Am J Roentgenol 1996 166 1421CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The diagnosis of breast implant rupture: MRI findings compared with findings at explantationEur J Radiol 2005 53 213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Single- and double-lumen silicone breast implant integrity: prospective evaluation of MR and US criteriaRadiology 1995 197 45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rupture of silicone-gel breast implants: causes, sequelae, and diagnosisLancet 1997 350 1531CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prevalence of rupture of silicone gel breast implants revealed on MR imaging in a population of women in Birmingham, AlabamaAJR Am J Roentgenol 2000 175 1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MR imaging of extracapsular silicone from breast implants: diagnostic pitfallsAJR Am J Roentgenol 2002 178 465CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surgical removal of ruptured breast implants: the use of intraoperative sonography in localizing free siliconeAJR Am J Roentgenol 1994 165 1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Style 410 cohesive silicone breast implants: safety and effectiveness at 5 to 9 years after implantationPlast Reconstr Surg 2006 118 1281CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clinical experience with a fourth-generation textured silicone gel breast implant: a review of 1012 Mentor MemoryGel breast implantsAesthetic Surg J 2008 28 642CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long-term safety and effectiveness of Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implantsAesthetic Plast Surg 2009 33 430CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Safety and effectiveness of Mentor’s MemoryGel implants at 6 yearsAesthetic Plast Surg 2009 33 440CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leakage and silicone lymphadenopathy with cohesive gel implantsBr J Plast Surg 2003 56 518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locoregional silicone spread after high cohesive gel silicone implant ruptureJ Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 2006 59 885CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silicone migration to the contralateral axillary lymph nodes and breast after highly cohesive silicone gel implant failure: a case reportCases J 2009 2 6420CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long-term cancer risk among Swedish women with cosmetic breast implants: an update of a nationwide studyJ Natl Cancer Inst 2006 98 557CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
B-cell and T-cell lymphomas of the breast: clinical pathologic features of 53 casesInt J Surg Pathol 2008 16 407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumulative absolute breast cancer risk for young women treated for Hodgkin lymphomaJ Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97 1428CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anaplastic large-cell lymphoma in women with breast implantsJAMA 2008 300 2030CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mammographic measurements before and after augmentation mammaplastyPlast Reconstr Surg 1989 86 1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Factors affecting mammographic visualization of the breast after augmentation mammaplastyJAMA 1992 268 1913CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Effect of breast augmentation on the accuracy of mammography and cancer characteristicsJAMA 2004 291 442CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radiation dose reduction for augmentation mammographyAJR Am J Roentgenol 2007 188 1414CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statement of the science concerning locoregional treatments after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer: a National Cancer Institute ConferenceJ Clin Oncol 2008 26 791CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The influence of RT on capsule formation and aesthetic outcome after immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional anatomic expander implantsJ Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 2006 59 1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Direct injection of paraffin into the breast: mammographic, sonographic, and MRI features of early complicationsAJR Am J Roentgenol 2006 186 888CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silicone pulmonary embolism: report of 10 cases and review of the literatureJ Comput Assist Tomogr 2009 33 233CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diagnosis of breast cancer at dynamic MRI in patients with breast augmentation by paraffin or silicone injectionClin Radiol 2009 64 1175CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evaluation of MRI findings after polyacrylamide gel injection for breast augmentationAJR Am J Roentgenol 2008 191 677CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radiologic features of polyacrylamide gel mammoplastyAJR Am J Roentgenol 2008 191 W89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed