Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Glossary
- Abbreviations
- 1 Basics of breast MRI
- 2 Imaging-related anatomy and pathology
- 3 Interpreting breast MRI studies
- 4 MRI-guided biopsy techniques
- 5 High-risk screening using breast MRI
- 6 Preoperative staging with breast MRI
- 7 Problem-solving applications of breast MRI
- 8 MRI after breast augmentation
- Answers to multiple choice questions
- Appendices
- Index
- Plate section
- References
1 - Basics of breast MRI
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Glossary
- Abbreviations
- 1 Basics of breast MRI
- 2 Imaging-related anatomy and pathology
- 3 Interpreting breast MRI studies
- 4 MRI-guided biopsy techniques
- 5 High-risk screening using breast MRI
- 6 Preoperative staging with breast MRI
- 7 Problem-solving applications of breast MRI
- 8 MRI after breast augmentation
- Answers to multiple choice questions
- Appendices
- Index
- Plate section
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Handbook of Breast MRI , pp. 1 - 21Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultraound, mammography and clinical breast examinationJAMA 2004 292 1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predispositionN Engl J Med 2004 351 427CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancerJ Clin Oncol 2005 23 8469CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicenter cohort study (MARIBS)Lancet 2005 365 1769Google Scholar
American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammographyCA Cancer J Clin 2007 57 75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancerN Engl J Med 2007 356 1295CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magnetic resonance imaging versus mammography for diagnosing ductal carcinoma in situJ Clin Oncol, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition) 2007 25 1504Google Scholar
Breast cancers not detected at MRI: review of false-negative lesionsAJR Am J Roentgenol 2010 194 1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The rise and impending decline of screening mammographyRadiology 2008 247 597CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trialJ Clin Oncol 2010 28 1450CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsyJAMA 2004 292 2735CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPAJ Comp Assist Tomogr 1986 10 199CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitationsRadiology 1989 171 95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observationsRadiology 1989 170 681CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Concepts for differential diagnosis in breast MR imagingMagn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006 14 305CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesionsRadiology 1999 211 101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter studyRadiology 2006 238 42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breast MR imaging in the diagnostic settingMagn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006 14 329CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imagingBreast J 2005 11 382CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational studyLancet 2007 370 485CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BI-RADS Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging AtlasReston, VAAmerican College of Radiology 2003Google Scholar
MRI-detected suspicious breast lesions: predictive values of kinetic features measured by computer-aided evaluationAJR Am J Roentgenol 2009 193 826CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk populationClin Radiol 2009 64 1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicenter study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesionsEur Radiol 2001 11 531CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Undetected malignancies of the breast: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 1.0 TRadiology 2002 224 881CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unusual malignant tumors of the breast: MRI features and pathologic correlationEur J Radiol 2010 75 178CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nonenhancing breast malignancies on MRI: sonographic and pathologic correlationAJR Am J Roentgenol 2005 185 481CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Optimal timing of breast MRI examinations for premenopausal women who do not have a normal menstrual cycleAJR Am J Roentgenol 2009 193 1738CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI of the breast: analysis of dose response and comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumineAJR Am J Roentgenol 2003 181 663CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for breast MR imaging (DETECT Trial)Radiology 2011 258 396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolutionRadiology 2005 236 789CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Proton MR spectroscopy with choline peak as malignancy marker improves positive predictive value for breast cancer diagnosis: preliminary studyRadiology 2006 239 686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1H MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: are they useful tools for characterizing breast lesions before biopsyAJR Am J Roentgenol 2009 193 840CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive valueAJR Am J Roentgenol 2009 193 1716CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b valuesAJR Am J Roentgenol 2009 193 1030CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors. The usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extensionJ Comput Assist Tomogr 2005 29 644CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Identification of residual breast carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: diffusion-weighted imaging – comparison with contrast-enhanced MR imaging and pathologic findingsRadiology 2010 254 357CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diffusion-weighted imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in correlation with histologic findingsAJR Am J Roentgenol 2009 193 260CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and sizeAJR Am J Roentgenol 2010 194 1664CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imagesEur J Radiol 2010 75 e126CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed