Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T15:33:17.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Carrier capture at bulk oxide traps

from Part I - Basic properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2014

Olof Engström
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenberg
Get access

Summary

Background

Minimizing the gate oxide charge is a frequent challenge in the development of metal–oxide–semiconductor (MOS) technology. The original procedures were developed at the time when SiO2 was the dominating gate insulator in MOS technology and detailed descriptions of the capture processes involved in these different experimental situations are seldom treated in the literature. Due to the need for device characterization, electrical methods dominate. Few luminescence results have been published, whereas the detailed character of oxide traps has been learnt mainly from electron spin resonance (ESR) data (see Chapters 9–11).

In recent years, especially when electrical methods have been practiced on high-k oxides with interlayers close to the silicon face, the electric field distribution in this environment is more complicated, which increases the complexity of interpreting measured data. In the present chapter, we will expound the charge carrier statistics for oxide traps, the variations in capture mechanisms and the processes between different capture conditions, and analyze their influence on experiments for quantifying capture cross sections of high-k oxide traps. We will mainly study the common techniques for injecting charge into oxide traps by electric fields, using MOS capacitors and transistors. Also, we will peel off a couple of sample dependent properties at some expense of quantitative precision by using two important approximations by (i) assuming that the concentration of electrons available for injection from the semiconductor into the oxide has a constant relation to the effective density of states in the semiconductor conduction band and (ii) neglecting the influence of captured charge on the potential distribution inside the oxide. Furthermore, all reasoning will be limited to electron injection and capture but can readily be turned into corresponding arguments for hole processes.

Type
Chapter
Information
The MOS System , pp. 104 - 128
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afanas'ev, V. V. and Stesmans, A. (2004). Stable trapping of electrons and holes in deposited insulating oxides: Al2O3, ZrO2 and HfO2. J. Appl. Phys. 95, 2518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, P. W. (1975). Model for electronic structure of amorphous semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augustin, M. P., Fonseca, L. R. C., Hooker, J. C. and Stemmer, S. (2006). Scanning transition electron microscopy of gate stacks with HfO2 dielectrics and TiN electrodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 121909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breed, D. J. (1974). Non-ionic room temperature instabilities in MOS devices. Solid-State Electron. 17, 1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broqvist, P. and Pasquarello, A. (2007). Band gaps and dielectric constants of amorphous hafnium silicates: A first principles investigation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 082907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, M. H., Zhang, J. F. and Zhang, W. D. (2006). Assessment of capture cross sections and affective density of states of electron traps generated in silicon dioxide. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 53, 093716.Google Scholar
Cho, M., Degraeve, R., Roussel, P. et al. (2010). A consistent model for oxide trap profiling with the trap spectroscopy by charge injection and sensing (TSCIS) technique. Solid-State Electron. 54, 1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, S. J., Lin, L. and Robertson, J. (2011). On the identification of the oxygen vacancy in HfO2. Microel. Eng. 88, 1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagleman, Y., Weber, M. and Derenzo, S. (2013). Luminescence study of oxygen vacancies in lanthanum hafnium oxide, La2Hf2O7. J. Lumin. 137, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engström, O., Mitrovic, I. Z. and Hall, S. (2012). Influence of interlayer properties on the characteristics of high-k gate stacks. Solid-State Electron. 75, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engström, O., Sedghi, N., Mitrovic, I. Z. and Hall, S. (2013). Analysis of electron capture at oxide traps by electric field injection. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 211604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, W. B. (1987). Oxygen vacancy and the E'1 center in crystalline SiO2. Phys. Rev. B 35, 8223.Google Scholar
Fowler, W. B., Rudra, J. K., Zvaut, M. E. and Feigl, F. J. (1990). Hysteresis and Franck-Condon relaxation in insulator-semiconductor tunneling. Phys. Rev. 41, 8313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gavartin, G. L, Muños Ramo, D., Shluger, A. L., Bersuker, G. and Lee, B. H. (2006). Negative oxygen vacancies in HfO2 as charge traps in high-k stacks. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 082908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillen, R., Robertson, J. and Clark, S. J. (2012). Electron spin resonance signature of the oxygen vacancy in HfO2. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 102904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, S., Buiu, O. and Lu, Y. (2004). Direct observation of anomalous positive charge and electron-trapping dynamics in high-k films using pulsed-MOS-capacitor measurements. IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 54, 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hara, H., Okamato, Y. and Ohnuma, H. (1970). A new instability in MOS transistor caused by hot electron and hole injection from drain avalanche plasma into gate oxide. Japanese J. Appl. Phys. 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiman, F. P. and Warfield, G. (1965). The effect of oxide traps on the MOS capacitance. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 12, 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, C. H. and Lang, D. V. (1977). Nonradiative capture and recombination by multiphonon emission in GaAs and GaP. Phys. Rev. B 15, 989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landsberg, P. T. (1991). Recombination in Semiconductors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leroux, C., Mitard, J., Ghibaudo, G. et al. (2004). Characterization and modeling of hysteresis phenomena in high K dielectrics. Proc. IEDM, 737.CrossRef
Li, H. and Robertson, J. (2012). Defect compensation in LaAlO3 perovskite based high dielectric constant oxides. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 034108.Google Scholar
Liu, D., Tse, K. and Robertson, J. (2007). Electronic structure and defects of high dielectric constant gate oxide La2Hf2O7. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 062901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitrovic, I. Z., Hall, S., Sedghi, N. et al. (2012). On the nature of interfacial layer in ultra-thin TiN/LaLuO3 gate stacks. J. Appl. Phys. 112, 044102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ning, T. H. (1976). High-field capture of electrons by Coulomb attractive centers in silicon dioxide. J. Appl. Phys. 47, 3203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ning, T. H. and Yu, H. N. (1974). Optically induced injection of hot electrons into SiO2. J. Appl.Phys. 45, 5373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantelides, S. T., Lu, Z. Y., Nicklaw, C. et al. (2008). The E' center and oxygen vacancies in SiO2. J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 354, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepper, M. (1973). Electron injection from avalanching p-n junctions. J. Phys. D 6, 2124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raeissi, B., Piscator, J., Chen, Y. Y. and Engström, O. (2011). Characterization of traps in the transition region at the HfO2/SiOx interface by thermally stimulated currents. J. Electrochem. Soc. 158, G63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renault, O., Samour, D., Damlencourt, J.-F. et al. (2002). HfO2/SiO2 interface chemistry studied by synchrotron radiation x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 3627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, J. (2006). High dielectric constant oxides for metal oxide Si transistors. Rep. Prog. Phys. 69, 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedghi, N., Mitrovic, I. Z., Hall, S., Lopes, J. M. J. and Schubert, J. (2011). CV measurements on LaLuO3 stack metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitor using new three-pulse technique. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. 29, 01AB03–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shockley, W. and Read, W. T. (1952). Statistics of the recombination of holes and electrons. Phys. Rev. 87, 835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoneham, A. M. (1975). Theory of Defects in Solids. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verwey, J. F. (1973). Nonoavalanche injection of hot carriers into SiO2. J. Appl. Phys. 44, 2681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, C. M., HolonyakJr, N. and Stillman, G. E. (1989). Physical Principles of Semiconductors. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, p. 92.Google Scholar
Xiong, K. and Robertson, J. (2009). Oxygen vacancies in high dielectric constant oxides La2O3, Lu2O3 and LaLuO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 022903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiong, K., Du, Y., Tse, K. and Robertson, J. (2007). Defect states in the high-dielectric constant gate oxide HfSiO4. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 024101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiong, K., Robertson, J. and Clark, S. J. (2006). Defect energy states in high-k gate oxides. Phys. Stat. Sol. B 247, 2071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiong, K., Robertson, J., Gibson, M. C. and Clark, S. J. (2005). Defect energy levels in HfO2 high dielectric-constant gate oxide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 183505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yueh, H. K. and Cox, B. (2003). Luminescence properties of zirconium oxide films. J. Nucl. Mat. 323, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zafar, S., Callegari, A., Gusev, E. and Fischetti, V. (2003). Charge trapping related threshold voltage instabilities in high permittivity gate dielectric stacks. J. Appl. Phys. 93, 9298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J. F., Taylor, S. and Eccleston, W. (1992). Electron trap generation in thermally grown SiO2 under Fowler-Nordheim stress. J. Appl. Phys. 71, 725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, C. Z., Zhang, J. F., Zahid, M. B., Govoreanu, B., Groesenken, G. and De Gendt, S. (2006). Determination of capture cross sections for as-grown electron traps in HfO2/HfSiO stacks. J. Appl. Phys. 100, 093716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×