Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T15:39:50.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Basic properties of the gate stack

from Part I - Basic properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2014

Olof Engström
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenberg
Get access

Summary

High-k oxides with properties interesting for gate stacks

In order to satisfy the demands for lower power consumption in modern transistor design, research focus moved from gate oxides of SiO2 to oxides based on metals from the transition and rare-earth series of the periodic table. The elements of major interest for the purpose are marked with dotted frames in the periodic table, shown in Fig. 3.1. The transition metals, Sc, Ti, Y, Zr, La, Hf and Ta, belonging to periods 4, 5 and 6, all have outer electron shell populated as d-orbitals. The rare-earth metals, starting at Ce and ending at Lu, arise as one of the irregularities in the design of the elements as given by Nature (Grimes and Grimes, 1998; Xue et al., 2000). They are inserted as exceptions between La and Hf. Because of the complicated energy scheme occurring when adding the second d-electron in period 6, 14 f-electrons with lower energy levels are added to provide the rare-earth metals, before the 72nd electron is added as a d-orbital to produce Hf. When reacting with oxygen, these metals give rise to insulators with high dielectric constants, which to some degree are related to their higher ionicity, but also to their atomic structures (Busani and Devine, 2005; Perevalov et al., 2007). This, in turn, links to their electronic configurations. The ionicity concept (Phillips, 1968; Van Vechten, 1969), which measures the degree of electron displacement in a chemical compound, is related to the difference in electronegativity between the reacting atoms as further discussed in Sections 3.2, 3.5 and 3.6 and will be shown to have an important meaning for the dielectric constant and the energy offset values at oxide/silicon interfaces (Engström et al., 2007).

Type
Chapter
Information
The MOS System , pp. 32 - 70
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alkauskas, A., Broqvist, P., Devynck, F. and Pasquarello, A. (2008). Band offsets at semiconductor-oxide interfaces from hybrid density-functional calculations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 106802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, R. L. (1962). Experiments on Ge-GaAs heterojunctions. Solid-State Electron. 5, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardeen, J. (1947). Surface states and rectification at a metal semi-conductor contact. Phys. Rev. 71, 717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, F. (1874). Über die Stromleitung durch Schwefelmetalle. Ann. Phys. Chem. 153, 556.Google Scholar
Brillson, L. J. (1978). Transition in schottky barrier formation with chemical reactivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broqvist, P., Alkauskas, A. and Pasquarello, A. (2008). Band alignment and defect levels in Si-HfO2 gate stacks: Oxygen vacancy and Fermi level pinning. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 132911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busani, T. and Devine, R. A. B. (2005). The importance of network structure in high-k dielectrics: LaAlO3, Pr2O3 and Ta2O3. J. Appl. Phys. 98, 044102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coh, S., Heeg, T., Haeni, J. H. et al. (2010). Si-compatible candidates for high-k dielectrics with the Pbnm perovskite structure. Phys. Rev. B 82, 064101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowley, A. M. and Sze, S. M. (1965). Surface states and barrier height of metal-semiconductor systems. J. Appl. Phys. 36, 3212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darbandy, G., Ritzenhaler, R., Lime, F. et al. (2010). Analytical modeling of the gate tunneling leakage for the determination of adequate high-k dielectrics in double gate SOI MOSFETs at the 22 nm node. Solid-State Electron. 54, 1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demkov, A. A., Fonseca, L. R. C., Verret, J., Tomfohr, J. and Sankey, O. F. (2005). Complex band structure and the band alignment problem at the Si-high-k dielectric interface. Phys. Rev. B 71, 195306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, O. (2012). A model for internal photoemission at high-k oxide/silicon energy barriers. J. Appl. Phys. 112, 064115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, O. (2013). Response to “Comment on ‘A model for internal photoemission at high-k oxide/silicon energy barriers’”. J. Appl. Phys. 113, 166102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engström, O., Raeissi, B., Hall, S. et al. (2007). Navigation aids in the search for future high-k dielectrics: Physical and electrical trends. Solid-State Electron. 51, 622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeouf, J. L. (1982). Are interface states consistent with Schottky barrier measurements?Appl. Phys. Lett. 41, 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, N. W. and Grimes, R. W. (1998). Dielectric polarizability of ions and the corresponding effective number of electrons. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 10, 3029.Google Scholar
Heine, V. (1965). Theory of surface states. Phys. Rev. 138, A1689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawanago, T., Kakushima, K., Ahmet, P. et al. (2013). Comparative study of electrical characteristics in (100) and (110) surface-oriented nMOSFETs with direct contact La-silicate/Si interface structure. Solid-State Electron. 84, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittel, C. (1966). Introduction to Solid State Physics. Wiley.Google Scholar
Kurtin, S., McGill, T. C. and Mead, C. A. (1969). Fundamental transition in the electronic nature of solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopes, J. M., Rockerath, M., Heeg, T. et al. (2006). Amorphous lanthanum lutetium thin films as an alternative high-k gate dielectric. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 222902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louie, S. G., Chelikovsky, J. R. and Cohen, M. L. (1977). Ionicity and the theory of Schottky barriers. Phys. Rev. B 15, 2154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, X., Demkov, A. A., Tryoso, D., Fejes, P., Gregory, R. and Zollner, S. (2008). Combined experimental and theoretical study of thin hafnia films. Phys. Rev. B 78, 245314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miedema, A. R., de Boer, F. R. and de Chatel, P. F. (1973). Empirical description of the role of electronegativity in alloy formation. J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 3, 1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miedema, A. R., de Chatel, P. F. and de Boer, F. R. (1980). Chesion in alloys – Fundamentals of a semi-empirical model. Physica 100B, 1.Google Scholar
Mönch, W. (1987). Role of virtual gap states and defects in metal-semiconductor contacts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mönch, W. (1996). Chemical trends of barrier heights in metal-semiconductor contacts: on the theory of the slope parameter. Appl. Surf. Sci. 92, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mönch, W. (1998). Valence-band offsets and Schottky barrier heights of layered semiconductors explained by interface-induced gap states. Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 1899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mönch, W. (2007). On the electric dipole contribution to the valence-band offset in semiconductor-oxide heterostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 042117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mönch, W. (2011). Branch-point energies and the band-structure lineup at Schottky contacts and heterostructures. J. Appl. Phys. 109, 113724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mönch, W. (2012). On the allevation of Fermi level pinning by ultrathin insulator layers in Schottky contacts. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 073706.Google Scholar
Mott, N. F. (1938). Note on the contact between a metal and an insulator or semi-conductor. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 34, 568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niles, D. W. and Margaritondo, G. (1986). A final nail in the coffin of the electron affinity rule. Proc. Of the 18th International Conference on the Physics of Semiconductors, p. 187. World Scientific, 1987, Editor: O. Engström.
Pauling, L. (1932). The nature of the chemical bond. IV. The energy of single bonds and the relative electronegativity of atoms. J Am Chem Soc. 54, 3570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, P. W. and Robertson, J. (2002). Band offsets and Schottky barrier heights of high dielectric constant oxides. J. Appl. Phys. 92, 4712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, P. W. and Robertson, J. (2004). Bonding, energies and band offsets of Si-ZrO2 and HfO2 gate oxide interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 057601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penn, D. R. (1968). Wave number dependent dielectric function of semiconductors. Phys. Rev. 128, 2093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perevalov, T. V., Gritsenko, V. A., Erenburg, S. B., Badalyan, A. M. and Wong, H. (2007). Atomic and electronic structure of amorphous and crystalline hafnium oxide: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and density functional calculations. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 053704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, J. C. (1968). Covalent bonds in crystals. II. Partially ionic binding. Phys. Rev. 168, 905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, J. (2000). Band offset of wide-band-gap oxides and implications on future electronic devices. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 18, 1785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruan, Y.-C. and Ching, W. Y. (1987). An effective dipole theory for band lineups in semiconductor heterojunctions. J. Appl. Phys. 62, 2886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruan, Y.-C., Wu, N., Jiang, X. and Ching, W. Y. (1988). An improved dipole theory for band lineups in semiconductor heterojunctions. J. Appl. Phys. 62, 2886.Google Scholar
Schlüter, M. (1978). Chemical trends in metal-semiconductor barrier heights. Phys. Rev. B 17, 5044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schottky, W. (1938). Halbleitertheorie der Sperrschicht. Die Naturwissenschaften 26, 843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, R. D. (1993). Dielectric polarizabilities of ions in oxides and flourides. J. Appl. Phys. 73, 348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shay, J. L., Wagner, S. and Phillips, J. C. (1976). Heterojunction band discontinuities. Appl. Phys. Lett. 28, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, J. (1993). Physics of Semiconductors and their Heterostructures. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Tersoff, J. (1984a). Theory of semiconductor heterojunctions: The role of quantum dipoles. Phys. Rev. B 30, 4874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tersoff, J. (1984b). Schottky barrier heights and the continuum of gap states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tse, K.-Y. and Robertson, J. (2007). Control of Schottky barrier heights on high-k gate dielectrics for future complementary metal-oxide semiconductor devices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 086805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tung, R. (2001). Recent advances in Schottky barrier concepts. Mat. Sci. Eng. R, 35, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Vechten, J. A. (1969). Quantum dielectric theory of electronegativity in covalent systems. I. Electronic dielectric constant. Phys. Rev. 182, 891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xhao, X. and Vanderbilt, D. (2002). First principle study of structural, vibrational and lattice dielectric properties of hafnium oxide. Phys. Rev. B 65, 233106.Google Scholar
Xue, D., Betzler, K. and Hesse, H. (2000). Dielectric constants of binary rare-earth compounds. J. Phys: Condens. Matter 20, 3113.Google Scholar
Yu, P. Y. and Cardona, M. (2010). Fundamentals of Semiconductors. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×