Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:31:15.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Variant 2: non-site level emissions in an ETS–the case of electricity importers in the California cap-and-trade

from Part II - MRV of industrial sites and entities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Marion Afriat
Affiliation:
CDC Climat
Emilie Alberola
Affiliation:
CDC Climat
Valentin Bellassen
Affiliation:
CDC Climat, Paris
Nicolas Stephan
Affiliation:
CDC Climat, Paris
Get access

Summary

Acknowledgements: We are grateful to Wade McCartney (California Air Resource Board) and David Edwards (California Air Resource Board) for their answers to our questions.

Context

Electricity in carbon pricing mechanisms

Most cap-and-trade schemes developed or in development in the world at least regulate CO2 emissions from the electricity sector. Several specifications may facilitate the inclusion of this power sector under this kind of regulation:

  1. • the electricity sector is usually responsible for a large share of CO2 energy emissions – 12 billion tons or 40 percent CO2 energy emissions globally;

  2. • some low-cost CO2 emission reductions opportunities exist within the sector such as fuel-switching (Ellerman et al., 2010; IEA, 2012);

  3. • the electricity sector is usually not at risk of carbon leakage, as international electricity trades are greatly limited by grid connections, and operators can therefore pass on the costs of carbon allowances to consumers in the price of electricity.

In terms of monitoring, reporting and verification of its CO2 emissions, the power sector offers some inherent advantages: large point sources, relatively few flows to monitor, fuel inputs traded and therefore measured, some data and reporting structures available from pre-existing regulation and a limited number of companies involved.

In most developed or developing cap-and-trade schemes, the electricity sector is covered at the production level – electricity producers rather than consumers are capped – and the regulation only applies to power plants located within the regulator's jurisdiction. However, the cap-and-trade scheme in California presents a specificity for the power sector: the regulation also covers the electricity imported from neighboring States. Another example of covering Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions from electricity consuming emissions and entities located outside the regulator's jurisdiction is the Shenzhen Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) pilot, see Chapter 8. From this angle, the Californian law is – to our knowledge – the first instance of a border carbon adjustment and, as such, a very interesting testing ground.

Type
Chapter
Information
Accounting for Carbon
Monitoring, Reporting and Verifying Emissions in the Climate Economy
, pp. 221 - 262
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ARB, 2013. California cap on greenhouse gas emissions and market-based compliance mechanisms regulation, www.arb.ca.gov/cc/ capandtrade/c-t-reg-reader-2013.pdf, p. 396. Accessed March 28, 2013.
ARB, [2007]2013. Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regulation (Mandatory reporting regulation or MRR). The MRR was originally approved in 2007 and revised in 2010, 2012 and 2013. The current regulation became effective on January 1, 2014. www.arb.ca.gov/cc/reporting/ghg-rep/regulation/mrr-2013-clean.pdf. Accessed March 28, 2013.
ARB, 2011. Staff report, Final Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking, amendments to the regulation for the mandatory reporting of greenhouse gas emissions, No. 10–11-12, p. 436.
ARB, 2013. Staff report, Final Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking, amendments to the regulation for the mandatory reporting of greenhouse gas emissions, No. 13-9-8, p. 261.
ARB, 2012. Staff report, Final Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking, amendments to the regulation for the mandatory reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and conforming amendments to the definition sections of the AB 32 cost of implementation fee regulation and the cap-and-trade regulation, No. 12-6-2, p. 99.
ARB, 2013. Staff report, Initial Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking, amendments to the regulation for the mandatory reporting of greenhouse gas emissions, p. 113.
ARB, 2012. Staff report, Initial Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking, amendments to the regulation for the mandatory reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and conforming amendments to the definition sections of the AB 32 cost of implementation fee regulation and the cap-and-trade regulation, p. 97.
ARB, 2007. Staff report, Initial Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking, a proposed regulation for mandatory reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, p. 232.
ARB, 2010. Staff report, Initial Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking, revisions to the regulation for mandatory reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, p. 292.
ARB, Verification of GHG Emissions Data Reports, ARB website, www.arb.ca.gov/cc/reporting/ghg-ver/ghg-ver.htm. Accessed December 2013.
Bode, R., 2012. Chief, Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory Branch. Interviewed by A. Mahapatra, July 26, 2012.
Bushnell, J., 2008. The design of California's cap-and-trade and its impact on electricity markets, Climate Policy 8(3): 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushnell, J., Chen, Y. and Zaragoza-Watkins, M., 2013. Emissions in California's Electricity Sector, University of California Energy Institute at Haas, working paper series, E3 WP-049, p. 31.
Caron, J., Rausch, S. and Winchester, N., 2012. Leakage from subnational climate initiatives: the case of California. MIT Global Change Unit report No. 220, p. 37. http://globalchange.mit.edu/files/document/MITJPSPGC_Rpt220.pdf. Accessed April 18, 2013.
Cosbey, A., Droege, S., Fischer, C., Reinaud, J., Stephenson, J., Weischer, L. and Wooders, P., 2012. A Guide for the Concerned: Guidance on the elaboration and implementation of border carbon adjustment, Entwined Policy Report No. 03, Stockholm, Sweden, p. 22.
Edwards, D., 2013. Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory Branch. Interviewed by M. Afriat, June 24, 2013.
Ellerman, A.D., Convery, F.J. and De Perthuis, C., 2010. Pricing Carbon: the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme, Cambridge University Press, p. 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IEA, 2012. 2012 Annual report, www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/IEA_Annual_Report_publicversion.pdf, p. 21. Accessed April 29, 2013.
MEDDE, Highlights, Key figures on climate, France and worldwide, 2014 Edition. Service de l'observation et des statistiques.
Singh, N. and Mahapatra, A., 2013. Designing Greenhouse Gas Reporting Systems: Learning From Existing Programs. Working Paper. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, p. 24.
US EPA, 2009. Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Final Rule (GHG Reporting), Final report, p. 219.
US EPA, 2010. Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, presentation at EPRI CEM User Group Meeting, Cleveland, Ohio, p. 28.
US EPA, 2011. Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, training presentation, p. 75. www.epa.gov/ghgreporting/documents/pdf/2010/Part-98-Training-Complete.pdf. Accessed April 25, 2013.
US EPA, 2011. Why Are Both Downstream and Upstream Reporting Required?, FAQ, US EPA website, www.ccdsupport.com/confluence/pages/view-page.action?pageId=91553964. Accessed April 25, 2013.
WECC, 2011. Ten Year Regional Transmission Plan, Executive summary, p. 20.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×