We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 May 2022
GENERAL INTRODUCTORY AND COMPARATIVE REMARKS ON CASE 10
Case 10 concerns land owned by more than one person and addresses the issue of whether co-owners can acquire another co-owner’s share in the land through long-term use. An issue linked to this acquisition is whether the co-owner who has not used the land for a long time can claim benefits reaped by other co-owners. The jurisdictions can be divided into four groups.
(1) NO ACQUISITION OF THE CO-OWNER‘S SHARE, BUT ENTITLEMENT TO THE BENEFITS
England and Wales, Finland, Norway, Russia, Slovakia, and Sweden do not recognise the possibility of co-owners acquiring the share of another co-owner in the land. They do not allow for acquisitions by unlawful occupiers through long-term use and, therefore, preclude co-owners from acquiring the share of another co-owner. Even under the Land Registration Act of 1925, English and Welsh law did not permit co-owners to acquire another co-owner’s share because of the fiduciary duties between the co-owners and because adjusting the use of the land to the will of the majority may be reconcilable with the rights of the co-owners so that there would be no adversity in the first place. Under the laws of these jurisdictions, the excluded co-owner is also entitled to her share in the profits derived from the land during her absence, subject to a limitations period.
(2) NO ACQUISITION OF THE CO-OWNER‘S SHARE AND ALSO NO ENTITLEMENT TO THE BENEFITS
Like the first group, Alberta, Germany and Scotland do not permit co-owners to acquire another co-owner’s share. However, in contrast to the first group, this second group of jurisdictions preclude the excluded co-owner from claiming her share in the profits. The difference between the first and the second group may be the result of the diverging entitlements of co-owners, in particular whether each co-owner may use the whole of the land, and of diverging answers to the question of whether it is each co-owner’s own responsibility to use the land or to secure profits from the land in another way
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
