Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:22:16.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Understanding Bias in Nonlinear Panel Models: Some Recent Developments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

Richard Blundell
Affiliation:
University College London
Whitney Newey
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Torsten Persson
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this paper is to review recently developed bias-adjusted methods of estimation of nonlinear panel data models with fixed effects. Standard estimators such as maximum likelihood estimators are usually inconsistent if the number of individuals n goes to infinity while the number of time periods T is held fixed. For some models, like static linear and logit regressions, there exist fixed-T consistent estimators as n→∞ (see, e.g., Andersen, 1970). Fixed T consistency is a desirable property because for many panels T is much smaller than n. However, these type of estimators are not available in general, and when they are, their properties do not normally extend to estimates of average marginal effects, which are often parameters of interest. Moreover, without auxiliary assumptions, the common parameters of certain nonlinear fixed effects models are simply unidentified in a fixed T setting, so that fixed-T consistent point estimation is not possible (see, e.g., Chamberlain, 1992). In other cases, although identifiable, fixed-T consistent estimation at the standard root-n rate is impossible (see, e.g., Honoré and Kyriazidou, 2000; Hahn, 2001).

The number of periods available for many household, firm-level or country panels is such that it is not less natural to talk of time-series finite sample bias than of fixed-T inconsistency or underidentification. In this light, an alternative reaction to the fact that micro panels are short is to ask for approximately unbiased estimators as opposed to estimators with no bias at all.

Type
Chapter
Information
Advances in Economics and Econometrics
Theory and Applications, Ninth World Congress
, pp. 381 - 409
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×