Achen, C. (1992). Social psychology, demographic variables, and linear regression: breaking the iron triangle in voting research. Political Behavior, 14: 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, J. F., Merrill, S. III, and Grofman, B. (2005). A Unified Theory of Party Competition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ai, C. and Norton, E. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80: 123–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alesina, A. and Rosenthal, H. (1995). Partisan Politics, Divided Government and the Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Almond, G. and Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, C. and Guillory, C. A. (1997). Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: a cross-national analysis of consensual and majoritarian systems. American Political Science Review, 91: 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansolabehere, S. and Schaffner, B. F. (2011). Re-examining the validity of different survey modes for measuring public opinion in the U.S.: findings from a 2010 multi-mode comparison. Paper presented at the AAPOR Annual Conference, Phoenix AZ, 12–15 May.

Arzheimer, K. (2009). Contextual factors and the extreme right vote in Western Europe, 1980–2002. American Journal of Political Science, 53: 259–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartle, J. (2005). Homogeneous models and heterogeneous voters. Political Studies, 53: 653–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, U. (1992). The Risk Society. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Beech, M. and Lee, S. (2008). Ten Years of New Labour. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benoit, K. (2004). Models of electoral system change. Electoral Studies, 23: 363–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berry, W. D., DeMeritt, J. H. R. and Esarey, J. (2010). Testing for interaction in binary logit and probit models: is a product term essential?American Journal of Political Science, 54: 248–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bjornskov, C., Dreher, A. and Fisher, J. A. V. (2007). The bigger the better? evidence of the effect of government size on life satisfaction around the world. Public Choice 130: 267–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, D. (1958). The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blair, T. (2010). A Journey. London: HutchinsonGoogle Scholar

Blais, A. (2000). To Vote or Not to Vote: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blais, A. and Gélineau, F. (2007). Winning, losing and satisfaction with democracy. Political Studies, 55: 425–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blais, A., Gidengil, E., Nevitte, N. and Johnston, R. (1996). The Challenge of Direct Democracy: The 1992 Canadian Referendum. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar

Bogdanor, V. (2011). The Coalition and the Constitution. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Boix, C. (1999). Setting the rules of the game: the choice of electoral systems in advanced democracies. American Political Science Review, 93: 609–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bok, D. (2010). The Politics of Happiness: What Government Can Learn from the New Research on Well-Being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowler, Shaun and Donovan, Todd (1998). Demanding Choices: Opinion, Voting and Direct Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brambor, T., Clark, W. and Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14: 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J. (1984). Voter choice and the evaluation of political alternatives. American Behavioral Scientist, 28: 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brickman, P. and Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In Appley, M. H., ed., Adaptation-Level Theory: A Symposium (New York: Academic Press), pp. 287–305.Google Scholar

Bruni, L. and Porta, P. L. (2005). Economics and Happiness: Framing the Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruni, L. and Porta, P. L. (eds.) (2007). Handbook on the Economics of Happiness. London: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Buiter, W. H. (1990). International Macroeconomics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach, 2nd edn. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Butler, D. and Ranney, A. (eds.) (1994). Referendums Around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. London: Macmillan.CrossRef

Butler, D. and Stokes, D. (1969). Political Change in Britain: Forces Shaping Electoral Choice. New York: St Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Butler, D. and Stokes, D. (1974). Political Change in Britain: Forces Shaping Electoral Choice, 2nd edn. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, A., Gurin, G. and Miller, W. (1954). The Voter Decides. Evanston, Il: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar

Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W. and Stokes, D. (1960). The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar

Carmines, E. G. and Stimson, J. A. (1989). Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton: NJ. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cartwright, E. (2011). Behavioral Economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Charemza, W. W. and Deadman, D. F. (1997). New Directions in Econometric Practice, 2nd edn. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Clarke, A. E., Frijters, P. and Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness and utility: an explanation of the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46: 95–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, H. D. and Kornberg, A. (1994). The politics and economics of constitutional choice: voting in Canada's 1992 national referendum. Journal of Politics, 56: 940–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, H. D. and McCutcheon, A. (2009). The dynamics of party identification reconsidered. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73: 704–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, H. D. and Stewart, M. C. (1994). Prospections, retrospections and rationality: the ‘Bankers’ model of presidential approval reconsidered. American Journal of Political Science, 38: 1104–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, H. D. and Whitten, G. D. (2013). Hard choices in hard times: valence voting in Germany 2009. Electoral Studies 32, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, H. D., Elliott, E. W., Mishler, W., Stewart, M. C., Whiteley, P. F. and Zuk, G. (1992). Controversies in Political Economy: Canada, Great Britain, the United States. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Clarke, H. D., Stewart, M. and Whiteley, P. (1998). New models for New Labour: the political economy of Labour party support, January 1992–April 1997. American Political Science Review, 92: 559–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, H. D., Ho, K. and Stewart, M. C. (2000). Major's lesser (not minor) effects: prime ministerial approval and governing party support in Britain since 1979. Electoral Studies 18: 255–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, H. D, Kornberg, A. and Stewart, M. (2004a). Referendum voting as political choice: the case of Quebec. British Journal of Political Science, 34: 345–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, H. D., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. C. and Whiteley, P. (2004b). Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, H. D., Kornberg, A. and Scotto, T. J. (2009a). Making Political Choices: Canada and the United States. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Clarke, H. D., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. C. and Whiteley, P. (2009b). Performance Politics and the British Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, H. D., Stewart, M., Sanders, D. and Whiteley, P. (2011). Valence politics and electoral choice in Britain. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 21(2): 237–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, H. D., Kornberg, A., Scotto, T. J. and Stewart, M. C. (2012). Political choices in hard times: voting in the 2010 U.S. House elections. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 22: 139–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coalition Progamme for Government (2010).

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conlisk, J. (1996). Why bounded rationality?Journal of Economic Literature, 34: 669–700.Google Scholar

Conover, P. and Feldman, S. (1986). Emotional reactions to the economy: I’m mad as hell and i'm not going to take it any more. American Journal of Political Science, 30: 50–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conservative Party (2010). Invitation to Join the Government of Britain: The Conservative Manifesto 2010.

Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter, D., ed., Ideology and Discontent (Glencoe, IL: The Free Press), pp. 206–61.Google Scholar

Converse, P. E. (1969). Of time and partisan stability. Comparative Political Studies, 2: 139–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crewe, I. (1986). On the death and resurrection of class voting: some comments on how Britain votes. Political Studies, 35: 620–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crossman, R. (1963). Introduction to Bagehot. In Bagehot, W., The English Constitution (London: Fontana), pp. 1–57.Google Scholar

Dahl, R. A. (1972). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Societies, 5th edn. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Dalton, R. J. (2013). The Apartisan American: Dealignment and Changing Electoral Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Dangerfield, G. (1935). The Strange Death of Liberal England. New York: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar

Delli Carpini, M. X. and Keeter, S. (1997). What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Denver, D., Hands, G., Fisher, J. and McAllister, I. (2002). The impact of constituency campaigning in the 2001 general election. In Bennie, L. et al., eds., British Elections & Parties Review, vol. 12 (London: Frank Cass), pp. 80–94.Google Scholar

de Vrees, C. H. (ed.) (2007). The Dynamics of Referendum Campaigns. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy: Towards Consolidation. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Diener, M. L. and McGovern, M. B. (2008). What makes people happy? In Eid, M. and Larsen, R. J., eds., The Science of Subjective Well-Being (New York: The Guilford Press).Google Scholar

di Palma, G. (1990). To Craft Democracies: An Essay in Democratic Transitions. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. and Oswald, A. (2003). The macroeconomics of happiness. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85: 809–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorussen, H. and Taylor, M. (eds.) (2007). Economic Voting. London: Routledge.

Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Druckman, J. and Parkin, M. (2005). The impact of media bias: how editorial slant affects voters. Journal of Politics, 67: 1030–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drukker, D. M. and Gates, R. M. (2011). State space methods in Stata. Journal of Statistical Software, 41: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duch, R. and Stevenson, R. T. (2008). The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Easterlin, R. (ed.) (2002). Happiness in Economics. London: Edward Elgar.

Easterlin, R. (2004). Explaining Happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100: 1176–83.Google Scholar

Easterlin, R. (2010). Happiness, Growth and the Life Cycle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Easton, D. (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar

Electoral Commission (2011). UK General Election Campaign Spending Report. London: Electoral Commission.Google Scholar

Enders, W. (2009). Applied Econometric Time-Series. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar

Erikson, R. S., MacKuen, M. B. and Stimson, J. A. (2002). The Macro-Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fails, M. D. and Pierce, H. N. ( 2010). Changing mass attitudes and democratic deepening’. Political Research Quarterly, 63: 174–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fair, R. (1978). The effect of economic events on votes for president. Review of Economics and Statistics, 60: 159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fair, R. (2004). Estimating How the Macroeconomy Works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Farrell, D. (2011). Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrell, D. and Schmitt-Beck, R. (eds.) (2002). Do Political Campaigns Matter: Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums. London: Routledge.CrossRef

Ferris, A. L. (2002). Religion and the quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3: 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fieldhouse, E. and Cutts, D. (2008). Diversity, density and turnout. Political Geography, 27: 530–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fisher, J. and Denver, D. (2008). From foot-slogging to call centres and direct mail: a framework for analysing the development of district-level campaigning. European Journal of Political Research, 47: 794–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, C. (1992). Measurement and the dynamics of party identification. Political Behavior, 14: 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, B. S. (2008). Happiness: A Revolution in Economics. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, B. S. and Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. Economic Journal, 110: 918–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, B. S. and Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Frey, B. S. and Stutzer, A. (2005). Happiness research: state and prospects. Review of Social Economy, 62: 207–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallagher, M. and Mitchell, P. (eds.) (2005). The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Gelman, A., King, G. and Boscardin, W. J. (1998). Estimating the probability of events that have never occurred: when is your vote decisive?Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Rationality for Mortals: How People Cope with Uncertainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R. and Pachur, T. (eds.) (2011). Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Gomez, B. and Wilson, M. (2001). Political sophistication and economic voting in the American electorate: a theory of heterogeneous attribution. American Journal of Political Science, 45: 899–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gomez, B. and Wilson, M. (2006). Cognitive heterogeneity and economic voting: a comparative analysis of four democratic electorates. American Journal of Political Science, 50: 127–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodhart, C. A. and Bhansali, R. J. (1970). Political economy. Political Studies, 18: 43–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 3: 424–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granger, C. W. J. and Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2: 111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, D. P., Palmquist, B. and Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Greene, W. (2003). Econometric Analysis, 5th edn. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Greene, W. (2010). Testing hypotheses about interaction terms in nonlinear models. Economics Letters, 107: 291–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Heath, A. F., Jowell, R. M. and Curtice, J. K. (1985). How Britain Votes. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Heath, A. F., Jowell, R. M. and Curtice, J. K. (1987). Trendless fluctuation: a reply to Crewe. Political Studies, 35: 256–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, A. F., Evans, G., Field, J. and Witherspoon, S. (1991). Understanding Political Change: The British Voter 1964–1987. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Helliwell, J. (2006). Well-being, social capital and public policy: what's new?Economic Journal, 116: C34–C45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helliwell, J. and Haifang, H. (2008). How's your government? International evidence linking good government and well-being. British Journal of Political Science, 38: 595–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helliwell, J. and Putnam, R. D. (2007). The social context of well-being. In Huppert, F. A., Baylis, N. and Kaverne, B., eds., The Science of Well-Being (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 435–60.Google Scholar

Hellwig, T. T. (2001). Interdependence, government constraints and economic voting. Journal of Politics, 63: 1141–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hendry, D. F. (1980). Econometrics – alchemy or science?Economica 47: 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hennessey, P. (2000). The Prime Minister: The Office and its Holders Since 1945. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Heseltine, M. (2012). No stone unturned in pursuit of growth. Independent Report. .

HM Treasury (2010). Budget 2010. London: HM Treasury.

Ho, K., Clarke, H. D., Chen, L-K. and Weng, D. L-C. (2013). Valence politics and electoral choice in a new democracy: the case of Taiwan. Electoral Studies, 32, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hox, J. (1998). Multilevel modeling: when and why. In Balderjahn, I., Mathar, R. and Schader, M., eds., Classification, Data Analysis and Data Highways (New York: Springer Verlag), pp. 147–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hugh-Jondes, D. (2011). Explaining institutional change: why elected politicians implement direct democracy. In Saskia, H., de Jong, W., Gijsenberg, J. and Howen, T., eds., Creative Crises of Democracy (Brussels: Peter Lang).Google Scholar

Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C. and Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom and rising happiness: a global perspective (1981–2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3: 264–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iyengar, S. (1991). Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jennings, M. K. and Niemi, R. G. (1974). The Political Character of Adolescence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica 59: 1551–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johansen, S. (1996). Likelihood-based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregression Models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Johnston, R. J., Pattie, C. J. and Allsopp, J. G. (1988). A Nation Dividing? The Electoral Map of Britain 1979–1987. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Johnston, R. J., Rossiter, D. J., Pattie, C. J., Dorling, D. F. L., MacAllister, I. and Tunstall, H. (1999). Changing biases in the operation of the UK's electoral system, 1950–1997. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1: 133–64.Google Scholar

Johnston, R. J., Pattie, C. J., Dorling, D. F. L., MacAllister, I., Tunstall, H. and Rossiter, D. J. (2000). The neighbourhood effect and voting in England and Wales: real or imagined?, in Cowley, P. J., Denver, D. R., Russell, A. T. and Harrison, L., eds., British Elections and Parties Review (London: Frank Cass), pp. 47–63.Google Scholar

Johnston, R. J., Propper, C., Burgess, S., Sarker, R., Bolster, A. and Jones, K. (2005). Spatial scale and the neighbourhood effect: multinominal models of voting at two recent British general elections. British Journal of Political Science, 35: 487–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (eds.) (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Kam, C. D. and Franzese, R. J. (2007). Modelling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Karp, J. (1998). The influence of elite endorsements in initiative campaigns. In Bowler, S., Donovan, T. and Tolbert, C. J., eds., Citizens as Legislators: Direct Democracy in the United States (Columbus: The Ohio State University Press), pp. 149–65.Google Scholar

Kavanagh, D. and Cowley, P. (2010). The British General Election of 2010. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kenny, C. (1999). Does growth cause happiness or does happiness cause growth? Kyklos, 52: 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Key, V. O. (1966). The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936–1960. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kiewiet, R. D. (1983). Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kinder, D. R. and Kiewiet, R. D. (1981). Sociotropic politics: the American case. British Journal of Political Science, 11: 129–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, A. (ed.) (2002). Leaders’ Personalities and the Outcome of Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Kornberg, A. and Clarke, H. D. (1992). Citizens and Community: Political Support in a Democratic Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kreft, I. G. G. (1996). Are multilevel techniques necessary? An overview, including simulation studies. Unpublished manuscript, California State University at Los Angeles.

Kreft, I. G. G. and de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krugman, P. (2012). End This Depression Now!New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Labour Party (2010). The Labour Party Manifesto: A Future Fair For All.

Lakeman, E. (1974). How Democracies Vote: A Study of Electoral Systems. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar

Lane, R. E. (2000). The Loss of Happiness in Market Economies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Layard, R. (2006). Happiness and public policy: a challenge to the profession. Economic Journal, 116: C24–C33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LeDuc, L. (2003). The Politics of Direct Democracy: Referendums in Global Perspective. Toronto: Broadview Press.Google Scholar

LeDuc, L. (2005). Saving the pound or voting for Europe?Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 15: 169–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, M. (1989). Liar's Poker. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1988). Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Lewis-Beck, M. S. and Nadeau, R. (2011). Economic voting theory: testing new dimensions. Electoral Studies, 30: 288–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis-Beck, M. S. and Paldam, M. (2000). Editorial: Economic voting, an introduction. Electoral Studies, 2: 113–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis-Beck, M. S., Nadeau, R. and Bélanger, E. (2012). French Presidential Elections. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Liberal Democrats (2010). Liberal Democrat Manifesto 2010.

Lipset, S. M. (1963). Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Lipsky, M. (1980). Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Long, J. S. and Freese, J. (2006). Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, 2nd edn. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar

Luevano, P. (1994). Response Rates in the National Election Studies 1948–1992. Technical Report 44. Ann Arbor, MI: American National Election Study.Google Scholar

Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: voting in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review, 88: 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupia, A. and McCubbins, M. (1998). The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Really Need to Know?New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lupia, A., McCubbins, M. and Popkin, S. (eds.) (2000). Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice and The Bounds of Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Luskin, R. (1987). Measuring political sophistication. American Journal of Political Science, 31: 856–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maas, C. J. M. and Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modelling. Methodology, 1: 86–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mandelson, P. (2010). The Third Man. London: Harper Press.Google Scholar

Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R. and MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Marcussen, M. and Zolner, M. (2001). The Danish EMU referendum 2000. Government and Opposition, 36: 379–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKenzie, R. and Silver, A. (1968). Angels in Marble: Working Class Conservatives in Urban England. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Merrill, S. and Grofman, B. (1999). A Unified Theory of Voting: Directional Proximity Spatial Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mill, J. S. (1987). Utilitarianism and Other Essays. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar

Miller, W. E. and Shanks, J. M. (1996). The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Mishler, W. and Rose, R. (2001). Political support for incomplete democracies: realist vs. idealist theories and measures. International Political Science Review, 22: 303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mondak, J. (1993). Source cues and policy approval: the cognitive dynamics of public support for the Reagan agenda. American Journal of Political Science, 37: 186–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muller, E. N. (1979). Aggressive Political Participation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Murray, J. (2012). A small model of the UK economy. Working paper number 4. London: Office of Budgetary Responsibility.

Nadeau, R., Martin, P. and Blais, A. (1999). Attitudes towards risk-taking and individual choice in the Quebec referendum on sovereignty. British Journal of Political Science, 29: 523–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nettle, D. (2005). Happiness: The Science Behind Your Smile. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Neuman, W. R., Marcus, G. E., Crigler, A. N., MacKuen, M. (eds.) (2007). The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Neundorf, A., Stegmueller, D. and Scotto, T. J. (2011). The individual-level dynamics of bounded partisanship. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75: 458–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nie, N. H., Junn, J. and Stehlik-Barry, K. (1996). Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Norpoth, H., Lewis-Beck, M. and Lafay, J-D. (eds.) (1991). Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Norris, P. (2010). May 6th 2010 British general election constituency results release 5.0. .

Norton, E. C., Wang, H. and Ai, C. (2004). Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit. The Stata Journal, 4: 154–67.Google Scholar

Norton, P. (2011). The politics of coalition. In Allen, N. and Bartle, J., eds., Britain at the Polls 2010 (London:Sage Publications).Google Scholar

Office for Budgetary Responsibility (2012). Economic and Fiscal Outlook. CM 8303. March. London: OBR.Google Scholar

Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar

Oswald, A. J. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. The Economic Journal, 107: 1815–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pacek, A. (2009). Politics vs. markets in the diffusion of human well-being: a cross-national analysis. Unpublished paper, Department of Political Science, Texas A&M University.

Pacek, A. and Radcliff, B. (2008). Assessing the welfare state: the politics of happiness. Perspectives on Politics, 6: 267–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paldam, M. (1991). How robust is the vote function? A study of seventeen nations over four decades. In Norpoth, H., Lewis-Beck, M. and Lafay, J-D., eds., Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press), pp. 9–31.Google Scholar

Palfrey, T. and Poole, K. (1987). The relationship between information, ideology and voting behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 31: 511–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parkin, F. (1968). Middle Class Radicals: The Social Basis of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pattie, C. J., Fieldhouse, E. A. and Johnston, R. J. (1995). Winning the local vote: the effectiveness of constituency campaign spending in Great Britain, 1983–1992. American Political Science Review, 89: 969–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popkin, S. (1991). The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Powell, G. B., and Whitten, G. (1993). A cross-national analysis of economic voting: taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science, 37: 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pulzer, P. (1967). Political Representation and Elections in Britain. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quinn, K., Bara, J. and Bartle, J. (2011). The UK Coalition Agreement of 2010: who won?Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 21: 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radcliff, B. and Pacek, A. (2001). Politics, markets and life satisfaction: the political economy of human happiness. American Political Science Review, 95: 939–52.Google Scholar

Raudenbush, S. W. and Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Rawnsley, A. (2010). The End of the Party: The Rise and Fall of New Labour. London: Viking Press.Google Scholar

Reinhart, C. M. and Rogoff, K. S. (2009). This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Riker, W. and Ordeshook, P. C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62: 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riker, W. and Ordeshook, P. C. (1973). An Introduction to Positive Political Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Rohrschneider, R. (2002). The democracy deficit and mass support for an EU-wide government. American Journal of Political Science, 46: 463–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ronis, D. L. and Lipinski, E. R. (1985). Value and uncertainty as weighting factors in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21: 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, R. and Mishler, W. (1996). Testing the Churchill hypothesis: popular support for democracy and its alternatives. Journal of Public Policy, 16: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Sanders, D. and Gavin, N. (2004). Television news, economic perceptions and political preferences in Britain, 1997–2001. Journal of Politics, 66: 1245–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, D., Clarke, H. D.Stewart, M. C. and Whiteley, P. (2007). Does mode matter for modeling political choice? evidence from the 2005 British Election Study. Political Analysis, 15: 257–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, D., Clarke, H. D.Stewart, M. C. and Whiteley, P. (2008). The endogeneity of preferences in spatial models: evidence from the 2005 British Election Study. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 18: 413–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, D., Clarke, H. D.Stewart, M. C. and Whiteley, P. (2011a). Downs, Stokes and the dynamics of electoral choice. British Journal of Political Science, 41: 287–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, D., Clarke, H. D., Stewart, M. C. and Whiteley, P. (2011b). Simulating the effects of the alternative vote in the 2010 UK General Election. Parliamentary Affairs, 64: 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarlvik, B. and Crewe, I. (1983). Decade of Dealignment: The Conservative Victory of 1970 and Electoral Trends in the 1970s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Seldon, A. (ed.) (2007). Blair's Britain, 1997–2007. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Seldon, A. and Lodge, G. (2010). Brown at 10. London: Biteback Publishers.Google Scholar

Seldon, A., Snowdon, P. and Collins, D. (eds.) (2007). Blair Unbounded. London: Simon & Schuster.

Seyd, P. and Whiteley, P. (1992). Labour's Grassroots: The Politics of Party Membership. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Seyd, P. and Whiteley, P. (2002). New Labour's Grassroots: The Transformation of the Labour Party Membership. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sims, C. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48: 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skidelsky, R. (2009). Keynes: The Return of the Master. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar

Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A. and Tetlock, P. E. (eds.) (1991). Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Soroka, S. N. (2006). Good news and bad news: asymmetric responses to economic information. Journal of Politics, 68: 372–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soroka, S. N., Bodet, M. A., Young, L. and Andrew, B. (2009). Campaign news and vote intentions. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 19: 359–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stewart, M. C. and Clarke, H. D. (1998). The dynamics of party identification in federal systems: the Canadian case. American Journal of Political Science, 42: 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stokes, D. E. (1963). Spatial models of party competition. American Political Science Review, 57: 368–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stokes, D. E. (1992). Valence politics. In Kavanagh, D. (ed.), Electoral Politics (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 141–64.Google Scholar

Tavits, M. (2007). Clarity of responsibility and corruption. American Journal of Political Science, 51: 218–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tett, G. (2009). Fool's Gold: How the Bold Dream of a Small Tribe at J. P. Morgan Was Corrupted by Wall Street Greed and Unleashed a Catastrophe. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Thaler, R. (1994). Quasi-Rational Economics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J. and King, G. (1999). Clarify: software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Department of Government, Harvard University.

Tov, W. and Diener, E. (2009). Culture and subjective well-being. In Diener, E. (ed.), Culture and Well-Being: The Collected Works of Ed Diener (Heidelberg: Springer Dordrecht).Google Scholar

van der Brug, W., van der Eijk, C. and Franklin, M. (2007). The Economy and the Vote. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vavreck, L. and Rivers, D. (2008). The 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 18: 355–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verba, S. and Nie, N. H.Participation in America. New York: Harper & Row.

Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L. and Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Vowles, J. (1995). The politics of electoral reform in New Zealand. International Political Science Review, 16: 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wagner, A. F., Schneider, F. and Halla, M. (2009). The quality of institutions and satisfaction with democracy in Western Europe – a panel analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 25: 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, I. and Smith, H. J. (2002). Fifty years of relative deprivation research. In Walker, I. and Smith, H. J., eds., Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development and Integration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1–9.Google Scholar

Wells, J. M. and Krieckhaus, J. (2006). Does national context influence democracy satisfaction? a multi-level analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 59: 569–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whiteley, P. (1995). Rational choice and political participation – evaluating the debate. Political Research Quarterly, 48: 211–34.Google Scholar

Whiteley, P. (2012). Political Participation in Britain: The Decline and Revival of Civic Culture. Oxford: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whiteley, P. and Seyd, P. (1994). Local party campaigning and voting behavior in Britain. Journal of Politics, 56: 242–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whiteley, P., Seyd, P. and Billinghurst, A. (2006). Third Force Politics: Liberal Democrats at the Grassroots. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whiteley, P., Clarke, H. D., Sanders, D. and Stewart, M. C. (2010). Government performance and life satisfaction in contemporary Britain. Journal of Politics, 72: 733–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whiteley, P., Clarke, H. D., Sanders, D. and Stewart, M. C. (2011). Britain says NO: voting in the AV ballot referendum. Parliamentary Affairs, 65: 301–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winkelmann, L. and Winkelmann, R. (1998). Why are the unemployed so unhappy? evidence from panel data. Economica, 65: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Worcester, R., Mortimore, R., Baines, P., Gill, M. (2011). Explaining Cameron's Coalition: How It Came About. London: Biteback Publishing.Google Scholar

Zaller, J. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar