Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T16:28:25.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2024

Belén Fernández Milmanda
Affiliation:
Trinity College
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abente-Brun, Diego. 2012. “Paraguay: Crecimento Económico, Conflicto Social e Incertidumbre Política.” Revista de Ciencia Política 32 (1): 229–44.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2008. “Persistence of Power, Elites, and Institutions.” American Economic Review 98 (1): 267–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acuña, Carlos. 1995. “Business Interests, Dictatorship, and Democracy in Argentina.” In Business and Democracy in Latin America, edited by Bartell, Ernest J. and Payne, Leigh A., 348. Pitt Latin American Series. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertus, Michael. 2015. Autocracy and Redistribution: The Politics of Land Reform. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertus, Michael. 2017. “Landowners and Democracy.” World Politics 69 (02): 233–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertus, Michael, and Gay, Victor. 2017. “Unlikely Democrats: Economic Elite Uncertainty under Dictatorship and Support for Democratization.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (3): 624–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertus, Michael, and Menaldo, Victor. 2018. Authoritarianism and the Elite Origins of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John Herbert. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. American Politics and Political Economy Series. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allern, Elin H., and Bale, Tim. 2012. “Political Parties and Interest Groups: Disentangling Complex Relationships.” Party Politics 18 (1): 725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Barry. 2001. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. Interests, Identities, and Institutions in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amorim Neto, Octavio, and Cox, Gary W.. 1997. “Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures, and the Number of Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 149–74.Google Scholar
Amorim Neto, Octavio, Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2003. “Agenda Power in Brazil’s Câmara Dos Deputados, 1989–98.” World Politics 55 (4): 550–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, Ben, and Samuels, David. 2010. “Inequality and Democratization: A Contractarian Approach.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (12): 1543–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, Ben, and Samuels, David. 2014. Inequality and Democratization: An Elite-Competition Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, de Figueiredo, John M., and Snyder, James M.. 2003. “Why Is There So Little Money in U.S. Politics?Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (1): 105–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arellano, Juan Carlos. 2009. “El Partido Nacional en Chile: Su Rol en el Conflicto Político (1966–1973).” Atenea (Concepción) 1 (499): 157–74.Google Scholar
Avendaño, Octavio, and Escudero, María Cristina. 2016. “Elitismo y Poder Gremial en la Sociedad Nacional de Agricultura (SNA).” Revista CS 20 (December): 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aylwin Azócar, Patricio. 1988. Un Desafío Colectivo. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Planeta.Google Scholar
Baer, Werner. 2014. The Brazilian Economy: Growth and Development. 7th ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Baland, Jean-Marie, and Robinson, James A.. 2008. “Land and Power: Theory and Evidence from Chile.” American Economic Review 98 (5): 1737–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baland, Jean-Marie, and Robinson, James A.. 2012. “The Political Value of Land: Political Reform and Land Prices in Chile.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (3): 601–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltar, Ronaldo. 1990. “Os Empresarios Rurais e a Reforma Agraria no Governo de Transição (1985–1988).” M.A. Dissertation, Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar
Barbalho, Alexandre, and Barboza, Giulano. 2020. “Bancada Evangélica: Uma Elite Parlamentar?Revista do Instituto de Políticas Públicas de Marília 6 (1): 131–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbechando. 2017. Mapa Político de Actores. El Campo en el Congreso. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Barham, Bradford, Clark, Mary, Katz, Elizabeth, and Schurman, Rachel. 1992. “Nontraditional Agricultural Exports in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 27 (2): 4382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barndt, William T. 2016. “The Organizational Foundations of Corporation-Based Parties.” In Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America, edited by Van Dyck, Brandon, Loxton, James, Domínguez, Jorge I., and Levitsky, Steven, 356–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barozet, Emmanuelle, and Aubry, Marcel. 2005. “De las Reformas Internas a la Candidatura Presidencial Autónoma: Los Nuevos Caminos Institucionales de Renovación Nacional.” Política 45: 165–96.Google Scholar
Barrenechea Carpio, Rodrigo. 2014. Becas, Bases y Votos: Alianza Para el Progreso y La Política Subnacional en el Perú. Serie Colección Mínima 69. Lima: IEP Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Barros, Sergio, and Silva, Vandoir. 2022. “Brazilian Economic and Agricultural Overview.” BR2022-0011. United States Department of Agriculture – Foreign Agricultural Service.Google Scholar
Barsky, Osvaldo, and Dávila, Mabel. 2008. La Rebelión del Campo. Historia del Conflicto Agrario Argentino. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Barsky, Osvaldo, and Gelman, Jorge, eds. 2009. Historia del Agro Argentino: Desde la Conquista hasta Comienzos del Siglo XXI. Colección Historia Argentina. Buenos Aires: Ed. Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Bartell, Ernest J. 1995. “Perceptions by Business Leaders and the Transition to Democracy in Chile.” In Business and Democracy in Latin America, edited by Bartell, Ernest J and Payne, Leigh A, 49104. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartell, Ernest J., and Payne, Leigh A., eds. 1995. Business and Democracy in Latin America. Pitt Latin American Series. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Arnold J. 1995. “Landlord and Campesino in the Chilean Road to Democracy.” In Agrarian Structure & Political Power: Landlord & Peasant in the Making of Latin America, edited by Huber, Evelyne and Safford, Frank, 2138. Pitt Latin American Series. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Arnold J. 2008. Chilean Rural Society from the Spanish Conquest to 1930. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Carl J. 1998. Against the Current: Privatization, Water Markets, and the State in Chile. Boston, MA: Springer US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen, Cohen, Martin, Karol, David, Masket, Seth, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10 (03): 571–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebbington, Anthony, and Bury, Jeffrey. 2013. Subterranean Struggles: New Dynamics of Mining, Oil, and Gas in Latin America. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bellin, Eva Rana. 2000. “Contingent Democrats: Industrialists, Labor, and Democratization in Late-Developing Countries.” World Politics 52 (2): 175205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2014. Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethell, Leslie, ed. 1993. Chile since Independence. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Taylor C. 2023. Evangelicals and Electoral Politics in Latin America: A Kingdom of This World. Cambridge Studies in Social Theory, Religion and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolsa de Cerales de Buenos Aires. 1983. “Memoria e Informe. Ejercicio 1982.” Buenos Aires: Bolsa de Cereales de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Bolsa de Cereales de Buenos Aires, and de Rosario, Bolsa de Comercio. 2009. La Interacción Público-Privada. Estudio de Caso: La Bancada Ruralista de Brasil.Google Scholar
Bolsa de Comercio de Rosario. 2016. “Informativo Semanal.”Google Scholar
Bratman, Eve. 2020. “Sustainable Development Reconsidered: The Left Turn’s Legacies in the Amazon.” In Legacies of the Left Turn in Latin America, edited by Balán, Manuel and Montambeault, François, 280309. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockett, Charles D. 1998. Land, Power, and Poverty: Agrarian Transformation and Political Conflict in Central America. 2nd ed. Thematic Studies in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Brou, Penélope. 2020. “Aportes Dudosos e Influencia Parlamentaria en Partidos Porosos: El Caso de Fuerza Popular y Algunos Grupos de Interés (2016–2018).” B.A. Thesis, Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
Budds, Jessica. 2013. “Water, Power, and the Production of Neoliberalism in Chile, 1973–2005.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31 (2): 301–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burden, Barry C. 2007. Personal Roots of Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canales, Lissette Cristalina. 2021. “Grupos Empresariales Familiares: Cambios Económicos y Políticos en El Salvador.” Tiempo y Economía 8 (2): 162–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cárdenas, Julián, and Robles-Rivera, Francisco. 2021. “Corporate Networks and Business Influence in Panama, Costa Rica, and El Salvador.” Colombia Internacional, 107: 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoza, Anthony L. 1983. Agrarian Elites and Italian Fascism: The Province of Bologna, 1901–1926. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John M, and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14 (4): 417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrière, Jean. 1980. Landowners and Politics in Chile: A Study of the “Sociedad Nacional de Agricultura”, 1932–1970. Amsterdam: CEDLA/FORIS Publications.Google Scholar
Cascione, Silvio, and de Araújo, Suely Mara Vaz Guimarães. 2019. “Obstáculos para Protagonismo das Frentes Parlamentares em Coalizões Presidenciais no Brasil.” Revista de Sociologia e Política 27 (72): 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castañeda, Jorge. 2006. “Latin America’s Left Turn.” Foreign Affairs 85 (3): 2843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalcanti de Albuquerque, Roberto, and Villela, Renato. 1991. “A Situação Social no Brasil: Um Balanço de Duas Décadas.” In A Questão Social no Brasil, edited by Velloso, João Paulo Dos Reis, 23104. São Paulo: Livraria Nobel.Google Scholar
CEPAL, Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. 2018. “Panorama Social de América Latina, 2017.” (LC/PUB.2018/1-P). Santiago. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/42716/7/S1800002_es.pdf.Google Scholar
Chaccha, Hilda. 2018. “El Poder de las Coaliciones en la Arena de las Políticas Públicas: Caso Ley Universitaria.” B.A. Thesis, Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
Collier, David. 2011. “Understanding Process Tracing.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (4): 823–30.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Munck, Gerardo L., eds. 2022. Critical Junctures and Historical Legacies: Insights and Methods for Comparative Social Science. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Conaghan, Catherine. 2000. “The Irrelevant Right: Alberto Fujimori and the New Politics of Pragmatic Peru.” In Conservative Parties, the Right, and Democracy in Latin America, edited by Middlebrook, Kevin J, 255–84. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Correa, Sofia. 2005. Con las Riendas del Poder. Santiago: Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and MacCubbins, Matthew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. California Series on Social Choice and Political Economy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
CREA (Consorcios Regionales de Experimentación Agrícola). 2014. “Censo 2014.” Buenos Aires: Movimiento CREA.Google Scholar
Culpepper, Pepper D. 2010. Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daïeff, Lorenzo. 2016. “Social Policies for Social Polities: How Conditional Cash Transfers Are Undermining Traditional Patrons in Northeast Brazil.” Revue Interventions Économiques. Papers in Political Economy, no. 56 (November).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dargent, Eduardo, and Camacho, Gabriela. 2023. “Two Roads of Neoliberal Reform in Higher Education.” In State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain: The Neoliberal State and Beyond, edited by Centeno, Miguel A and Ferraro, Agustin E, 213–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dargent, Eduardo, and Rousseau, Stéphanie. 2022. “Choque de Poderes y Degradación Institucional: Cambio de Sistema sin Cambio de Reglas en el Perú (2016–2022).” Política y Gobierno 29 (2): 128.Google Scholar
De La O, Ana Lorena. 2018. Crafting Policies to End Poverty in Latin America: The Quiet Transformation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Luca, Miguel, Jones, Mark P., and Tula, María Inés. 2002. “Back Rooms or Ballot Boxes?: Candidate Nomination in Argentina.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (4): 413–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Cogliano, Natalia. 2016. “Después del Conflicto con el Campo en 2008, ¿Los Partidos Abrieron sus Listas a los Dirigentes Agropecuarios? Un Estudio sobre la Coordinación Electoral de Elites Partidarias y Agropecuarias en Argentina.” Desarrollo Económico 56 (218): 101–30.Google Scholar
Di Tella, Torcuato. 1971. “La Búsqueda de la Fórmula Política Argentina.” Desarrollo Económico 11 (42/44): 317–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DIAP. 2010. “Radiografia do Novo Congresso. Legislatura 2011–2015.” Estudos Políticos. Brasília: DIAP-Departamento Intersindical de Assessoria Parlamentar.Google Scholar
Diniz, Eli, and Boschi, Renato Raul. 2004. Empresários, Interesses e Mercado: Dilemas do Desenvolvimento no Brasil. Humanitas 110. Belo Horizonte: Rio de Janeiro: Editora UFMG; IUPERJ.Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash, Grossman, Gene M., and Helpman, Elhanan. 1997. “Common Agency and Coordination: General Theory and Application to Government Policy Making.” Journal of Political Economy 105 (4): 752–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dourojeanni, Axel, and Jouravlev, Andrei. 1999. “El Código de Aguas de Chile: Entre la Ideología y la Realidad.” Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.Google Scholar
Dreifuss, René Armand. 1989. O Jogo da Direita. Petrópolis: Vozes.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1964. Political Parties. Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Esquerdo, Vanilde, and Bergamasco, Sonia. 2013. “Balanço sobre a Reforma Agrária Brasileira nas Duas Últimas Décadas.” Interciencia 38 (8): 563–69.Google Scholar
Ezquerro-Cañete, Arturo, and Fogel, Ramón. 2017. “A Coup Foretold: Fernando Lugo and the Lost Promise of Land reform in Paraguay.” Journal of Agrarian Change 17 (2): 279–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fair, Hernán. 2017. “Las Principales Entidades Agropecuarias de la Argentina en la Etapa Previa al Orden Neoliberal. Posicionamientos Políticos, Disputas en Torno al Modelo Económico y Social y Eficacia Interpelativa.” Mundo Agrario 18 (37): 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha. 2011. “Business Power and Protest: Argentina’s Agricultural Producers Protest in Comparative Context.” Studies in Comparative International Development 46 (4): 424–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha. 2015a. Private Wealth and Public Revenue in Latin America: Business Power and Tax Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha. 2015b. “Structural Power in Comparative Political Economy: Perspectives from Policy Formulation in Latin America.” Business and Politics 17 (03): 411–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrer, Benjamin. 2018. Organizing for Policy Influence: Comparing Parties, Interest Groups, and Direct Action. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fearnside, Philip M. 2001. “Soybean Cultivation as a Threat to the Environment in Brazil.” Environmental Conservation 28 (1): 2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández Milmanda, Belén. 2023. “Harvesting Influence: Agrarian Elites and Democracy in Brazil.” Politics & Society 51 (1), 135–61.Google Scholar
Fernández Milmanda, Belén, and Garay, Candelaria. 2019. “Subnational Variation in Forest Protection in the Argentine Chaco.” World Development 118 (June): 7990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández Milmanda, Belén, and Garay, Candelaria. 2020. “The Multilevel Politics of Enforcement: Environmental Institutions in Argentina.” Politics & Society 48 (1): 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueiredo, Argelina, and Limongi, Fernando. 2007. “Instituições Políticas e Governabilidade: Desempenho do Governo e Apoio Legislativo na Democracia Brasileira.” In A Democracia Brasileira: Balanço e Perspectivas para o Século 21, edited by Melo, Carlos Ranulfo and Saez, Manuel Alcántara, 147–98. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.Google Scholar
Fleischer, David. 1980. “A Evolução do Bipartidismo Brasileiro 1966–1979.” Revista Brasileira de Estudios Politicos 51 (2): 155–85.Google Scholar
Fleischer, David. 1988. “Perfil Sócio-Econômico e Político da Constituinte.” O Processo Constituinte 1987–1988. Documentação Fotográfica [Sobre] a Nova Constituição.Google Scholar
Freston, Paul. 2001. Evangelicals and Politics in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freytes, Carlos. 2015. “The Cerrado Is Not the Pampas: Explaining Tax and Regulatory Policies on Agricultural Exports in Argentina and Brazil (2003–2013).” Ph.D. Dissertation, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Fried, Brian J. 2012. “Distributive Politics and Conditional Cash Transfers: The Case of Brazil’s Bolsa Família.” World Development 40 (5): 1042–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry. 1991. Debt, Development, and Democracy: Modern Political Economy and Latin America, 1965–1985. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry. 1999. “Actors and Preferences in International Relations.” In Strategic Choice and International Relations, edited by David A., Lake and Powell, Robert, 3976. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Michael. 2018. “Election Indices Dataset.” 2018. www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/people/michael_gallagher/ElSystems/index.php.Google Scholar
Garretón, Manuel A. 1987. Reconstruir la Política: Transición y Consolidación Democrática en Chile. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Andante.Google Scholar
Garretón, Manuel A. 2003. Incomplete Democracy: Political Democratization in Chile and Latin America. Latin America in Translation / En Traducción / Em Tradução. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Garrido, José, Guerrero, Cristian, and Valdés, María Soledad. 1988. Historia de la Reforma Agraria en Chile. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria.Google Scholar
Gatto, Malu A. C., and Power, Timothy J. 2016. “Postmaterialism and Political Elites: The Value Priorities of Brazilian Federal Legislators.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 8 (1): 3368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehlbach, Scott, Sonin, Konstantin, and Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina. 2010. “Businessman Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (3): 718–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. BCSIA Studies in International Security. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1943. Bread and Democracy in Germany. Cornell Paperbacks. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward L. 1992. “Conservative Electoral Movements and Democratic Politics: Core Constituencies, Coalition Building, and the Latin American Electoral Right.” In The Right and Democracy in Latin America, edited by Chalmers, Douglas, de Sousa, Maria do Carmo Campello, and Borón, Atilio, 1342. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward L. 1996. Class and Conservative Parties: Argentina in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward L. 1997. “The Populist Road to Market Reform: Policy and Electoral Coalitions in Mexico and Argentina.” World Politics 49 (3): 339–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraudy, María Eugenia. 2015. “Conservative Popular Appeals: The Electoral Strategies of Latin America’s Right Parties.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Gonçalves Costa, Sandra. 2012. “A Questão Agrária no Brazil e a Bancada Ruralista no Congresso Nacional.” M.A. Dissertation, São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Gras, Carla. 2012a. “Elites Rurales Contemporáneas: Cambio Tecnológico, Liderazgo Empresarial y Acción Política en la Argentina Sojera.” In Democracia y Reconfiguraciones Contemporáneas del Derecho en América Latina, 342–68. Madrid: Editorial Biblioteca Iberoamericana Vervuert.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gras, Carla. 2012b. “Empresarios Rurales y Acción Política en Argentina.” Estudios Sociológicos 30 (89): 459–87.Google Scholar
Grinberg, Lucia. 2009. Partido Político ou Bode Expiatório: Um Estudo sobre a Aliança Renovadora Nacional, ARENA (1965–1979). Rio de Janeiro: FAPERJ: Mauad X.Google Scholar
Gross, Daniel R. 1973. “Factionalism and Local Level Politics in Rural Brazil.” Journal of Anthropological Research 29 (2): 123–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Gene M., and Helpman, Elhanan. 2001. Special Interest Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grzymała-Busse, Anna Maria. 2015. Nations under God: How Churches Use Moral Authority to Influence Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guereña, Arantxa, and Villagra, Luis Rojas. 2016. “Ivy Jára. Los Dueños de la Tierra En Paraguay.” Asunción: Oxfam.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob, and Pierson, Paul. 2002. “Business Power and Social Policy: Employers and the Formation of the American Welfare State.” Politics & Society 30 (2): 277325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hagopian, Frances. 1990. “Democracy by Undemocratic Means?: Elites, Political Pacts, and Regime Transition in Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies 23 (2): 147–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagopian, Frances. 1996. Traditional Politics and Regime Change in Brazil. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagopian, Frances, and Mainwaring, Scott. 2005. The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Henry E. 2006. Why Not Parties in Russia? Democracy, Federalism, and the State. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Richard L. 1998. Participation in Congress. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, Susan Webb. 2001. Congressional Caucuses in National Policy Making. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, John Mark. 1991. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981: American Politics and Political Economy Series. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heaney, Michael T. 2010. “Linking Political Parties and Interest Groups.” In The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups, edited by Maisel, Sandy, Berry, Jeffrey, and Edwards, George III, 568–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Helfand, Steven M. 1999. “The Political Economy of Agricultural Policy in Brazil: Decision Making and Influence from 1964 to 1992.” Latin American Research Review 34 (2): 341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernandez, Valeria A. 2007. “El Fenómeno Económico y Cultural del Boom de la Soja y el Empresariado Innovador.” Desarrollo Económico 47 (187): 331–65.Google Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2009. Building Party Systems in Developing Democracies. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen, and Kuhonta, Erik Martinez, eds. 2015. Party System Institutionalization in Asia: Democracies, Autocracies, and the Shadows of the Past. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hidalgo, Martin. 2023. ¿Cuándo Se Jodió el Congreso? Lima: Planeta.Google Scholar
Hora, Roy. 2002. Los Terratenientes de la Pampa Argentina: Una Historia Social y Política, 1860–1945. 1. ed. Argentina. Colección Historia y Política 3. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno de Argentina Editores.Google Scholar
Hora, Roy. 2009. Los Estancieros Contra el Estado: La Liga Agraria y la Formación del Ruralismo Político en la Argentina. Historia y Cultura. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.Google Scholar
Hora, Roy. 2010. “La Crisis del Campo del Otoño de 2008.” Desarrollo Económico 50 (197): 81111.Google Scholar
Hora, Roy. 2012. “La Evolución del Sector Agroexportador Argentino en el Largo Plazo, 1880–2010.” Historia Agraria 58 (December): 145–81.Google Scholar
Hora, Roy. 2018. ¿Cómo Pensaron el Campo los Argentinos? Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Heaven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística). 2012. “Censo Agropecuário 2006. Brasil, Grandes Regiões e Unidades da Federação. Segunda Apuração.” Rio de Janeiro, RJ.Google Scholar
Imaz, Jose Luis De. 1959. La Clase Alta de Buenos Aires. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
INDEC (Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos). 2002. “Censo Nacional Agropecuario.” Available at: https://sitioanterior.indec.gob.ar/cna_index.asp.Google Scholar
INE (Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas). 2007. “Cambios Estructurales en la Agricultura Chilena. Análisis Intercensal, 1976-1997-2007.” Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas.Google Scholar
INESC. 2007. “Bancada Ruralista: O Maior Grupo de Interesse no Congresso Nacional.” 12. Year VII. Instituto de Estudos Socioecônomicos.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Alan M. 2008. “The Politics of When: Redistribution, Investment and Policy Making for the Long Term.” British Journal of Political Science 38 (2): 193220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenks, Margaret. 1979. “Political Parties in Authoritarian Brazil.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Durham, SC: Duke University.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kenneth. 1993. “Between Revolution and Democracy: Business Elites and the State in El Salvador during the 1980s.” Ph.D. Dissertation, New Orleans, LA: Tulane University.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 2008. “The Recruitment and Selection of Legislative Candidates in Argentina.” In Pathways to Power. Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America, edited by Siavelis, Peter M. and Morgenstern, Scott, 4175. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos, eds. 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 1996. The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. The Wilder House Series in Politics, History, and Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 1998. “From Pulpit to Party: Party Formation and the Christian Democratic Phenomenon.” Comparative Politics 30 (3): 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinzo, Maria D’Alva G. 1988. Legal Opposition Politics under Authoritarian Rule in Brazil: The Case of the MDB, 1966–79. St Antony’s / Macmillan Series. Houndmills: Macmillan in association with St Antony’s College, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klašnja, Marko, and Titiunik, Rocío. 2017. “The Incumbency Curse: Weak Parties, Term Limits, and Unfulfilled Accountability.” American Political Science Review 111 (01): 129–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koivumaeki, Ritta-Ilona. 2010. “Business, Economic Experts, and Conservative Party Building in Latin America: The Case of El Salvador.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 2 (1): 79106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtz, Marcus J. 1999. “Free Markets and Democratic Consolidation in Chile: The National Politics of Rural Transformation.” Politics & Society 27 (2): 275301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtz, Marcus J. 2006. Free Market Democracy and the Chilean and Mexican Countryside. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Marcus J. 2013. Latin American State Building in Comparative Perspective: Social Foundations of Institutional Order. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapp, Nancy D. 2004. Landing Votes. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattuada, Mario J. 1986. La Política Agraria Peronista (1943–1983)/2. Buenos Aires: Centro Editor de América Latina.Google Scholar
Lattuada, Mario J. 1988. Política Agraria y Partidos Políticos (1946–1983). Biblioteca Política Argentina 233. Buenos Aires: Centro Editor de América Latina.Google Scholar
Lattuada, Mario J. 1992. “Notas sobre Corporaciones Agropecuarias y Estado.” Estudios Sociales 2: 123–48.Google Scholar
Lattuada, Mario J. 2006. Acción Colectiva y Corporaciones Agrarias en la Argentina: Transformaciones Institucionales a Fines Del Siglo XX. Colección Convergencia. Bernal, Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes Editorial.Google Scholar
Leal, Victor Nunes. 1948. Coronelismo, Enxada e Voto. O Município e o Regimen Representativo no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Companhia Das Letras.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2018. “Peru: The Institutionalization of Politics without Parties.” In Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse, edited by Mainwaring, Scott, 1st ed., 326–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, Loxton, James, and Van Dyck, Brandon. 2016. “Introduction: Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America.” In Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America, edited by Levitsky, Steven, Loxton, James, Van Dyck, Brandon, and Dominguez, Jorge, 135. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Roberts, Kenneth M., eds. 2011. The Resurgence of the Latin American Left. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles Edward. 1977. Politics and Markets: The World’s Political Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan. 1976. “Some Notes towards a Comparative Study of Fascism in Sociological Historical Perspective.” In Fascisism: A Reader’s Guide, edited by Laqueur, Walter, 3: 121. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lissin, Lautaro. 2010. Federación Agraria Hoy: El Campo Argentino en Discusión. Claves Para Todos. Buenos Aires: Capital Intelectual.Google Scholar
Losada, Leandro. 2009. Historia de las Elites en la Argentina: Desde la Conquista hasta el Surgimiento del Peronismo. Colección Historia Argentina. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Love, Joseph L. 1970. “Political Participation in Brazil, 1881–1969.” Luso-Brazilian Review 7 (2): 324.Google Scholar
Loveman, Brian. 1976. Struggle in the Countryside; Politics and Rural Labor in Chile, 1919–1973. International Development Research Center. Studies in Development, No. 10. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Loxton, James. 2021. Conservative Party-Building in Latin America: Authoritarian Inheritance and Counterrevolutionary Struggle. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo. 2014. Segmented Representation: Political Party Strategies in Unequal Democracies. 1st ed. Oxford Studies in Democratization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo, and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, eds. 2014. The Resilience of the Latin American Right. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo, Rodríguez, Rafael Piñeiro, Rosenblatt, Fernando, and Vommaro, Gabriel, eds. 2021. Diminished Parties: Democratic Representation in Contemporary Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Noam. 2017. Party Brands in Crisis: Partisanship, Brand Dilution, and the Breakdown of Political Parties in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lustig, Nora. 2015. “Most Unequal on Earth.” Finance and Development 52 (3): 1416.Google Scholar
Lynch, Edward A. 1993. Latin America’s Christian Democratic Parties: A Political Economy. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Madariaga, Aldo, Maillet, Antoine, and Rozas, Joaquín. 2021. “Multilevel Business Power in Environmental Politics: The Avocado Boom and Water Scarcity in Chile.” Environmental Politics 30 (7): 1174–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2002. Legacies of Liberalism: Path Dependence and Political Regimes in Central America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. ed. 2018. Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Shugart, Matthew Soberg, eds. 2003. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Zoco, Edurne. 2007. “Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition: Electoral Volatility in Old and New Democracies.” Party Politics 13 (2): 155–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, Meneguello, Rachel, and Power, Timothy J.. 2000. “Conservative Parties, Democracy, and Economic Reform in Contemporary Brazil.” In Conservative Parties, the Right, and Democracy in Latin America, edited by Kevin, J. Middlebrook, 164222. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mancuso, Wagner Pralon. 2004. “The Industrial Lobby in Congress: Business Leaders and Politics in Contemporary Brazil.” Dados 47 (3): 505–47.Google Scholar
Mangonnet, Jorge, Murillo, María Victoria, and Rubio, Julia María. 2018. “Local Economic Voting and the Agricultural Boom in Argentina, 2007–2015.” Latin American Politics and Society, May, 127.Google Scholar
Manzetti, Luigi. 1992. “The Evolution of Agricultural Interest Groups in Argentina.” Journal of Latin American Studies 24 (3): 585616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcel, Mario. 1997. “Políticas Públicas en Democracia: El Caso de la Reforma Tributaria de 1990 en Chile.” Colección de Estudios CIEPLAN 45 (June): 3383.Google Scholar
Martínez-Lara, Javier. 1996. Building Democracy in Brazil: The Politics of Constitutional Change, 1985–95. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, and Rothenberg, Lawrence S.. 1996. “Commitment and the Campaign Contribution Contract.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, James. 1995. “Political Parties and Democracy in Argentina.” In Building Democratic Institutions, edited by Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R., 200–46. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McKay, Ben, and Colque, Gonzalo. 2016. “Bolivia’s Soy Complex: The Development of ‘Productive Exclusion.’The Journal of Peasant Studies 43 (2): 583610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middlebrook, Kevin J. 2000. “Introduction: Conservative Parties, Elite Representation, and Democracy in Latin America.” In Conservative Parties, the Right, and Democracy in Latin America, edited by Middlebrook, Kevin J., 150. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montero, Alfred P. 2012. “A Reversal of Political Fortune: The Transitional Dynamics of Conservative Rule in the Brazilian Northeast.” Latin American Politics and Society 54 (1): 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Barrington. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Morresi, Sergio. 2015. “‘Acá Somos Todos Democráticos’ El PRO y las Relaciones entre la Derecha y la Democracia en Argentina.” In “Hagamos Equipo”: PRO y la Construcción de la Nueva Derecha en Argentina, edited by Vommaro, Gabriel and Morresi, Sergio, 163202. Los Polvorines: Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento.Google Scholar
Murillo, María Victoria, and Pinto, Pablo M.. 2022. “Heeding to the Losers: Legislators’ Trade-Policy Preferences and Legislative Behavior.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 47 (3): 539603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navia, Patricio. 2002. “You Select the Rules of the Game and Lose? Advantages and Constraints When Choosing Electoral Rules: The Case of Chile.” Ph.D. Dissertation, New York: New York University.Google Scholar
Navia, Patricio, and Godoy, Ricardo. 2014. “The Alianza’s Quest to Win Power Democratically.” In Democratic Chile: The Politics and Policies of a Historic Coalition, 1990–2010, edited by Sehnbruch, Kirsten and Siavelis, Peter, 4368. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Nin-Pratt, Alejandro, Falconi, César, Ludeña, Carlos E. and Martel, Pedro. 2015. “Productivity and the performance of agriculture in Latin America and the Caribbean: from the lost decade to the commodity boom.” Inter-American Development Bank Working Paper No. 608 (IDB-WP-608), Washington DC.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. The Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nun, José, and Lattuada, Mario J.. 1991. El Gobierno de Alfonsín y las Corporaciones Agrarias. Colección “Sentido Común y Política.” Buenos Aires: Manantial.Google Scholar
ODEPA, (Oficina de Estudios y Políticas Agrarias). 2007. “Nuevo Escáner al Campo Chileno: VII Censo Nacional Agropecuario y Forestal 2007.” INE-Odepa. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12650/3206.Google Scholar
ODEPA, (Oficina de Estudios y Políticas Agrarias). 2021. “Catastro Frutícola. Principales Resultados. Región de O’Higgins.”Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo A. 1988. Bureaucratic Authoritarianism: Argentina, 1966–1973, in Comparative Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo A., and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ondetti, Gabriel A. 2007. “An Ambivalent Legacy: Cardoso and Land Reform.” Latin American Perspectives 34 (5): 925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ondetti, Gabriel A. 2008. Land, Protest, and Politics: The Landless Movement and the Struggle for Land reform in Brazil. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Ondetti, Gabriel A. 2016. “The Social Function of Property, Land Rights and Social Welfare in Brazil.” Land Use Policy 50 (January): 2937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ondetti, Gabriel A. 2021. Property Threats and the Politics of Anti-statism the Historical Roots of Contemporary Tax Systems in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Bibiana. 2018. “Political Participation of Evangelicals in Colombia 1990–2017.” Politics and Religion Journal 12 (1): 1754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxhorn, Philip. 1995. Organizing Civil Society: The Popular Sectors and the Struggle for Democracy in Chile. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Paige, Jeffery M. 1999. Coffee and Power: Revolution and the Rise of Democracy in Central America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Paiva, Denise Ferreira. 2002. PFL x PMDB: Marchas e Contramarchas (1982–2000). Goiania: Editora Alternativa.Google Scholar
Palomino, Mirta L. de. 1987. “Las Organizaciones Empresarias Ante el Gobierno Constitucional. Las Entidades Agropecuarias.” In Ensayos sobre la Transición Democrática en la Argentina, edited by Nun, José and Portantiero, Juan Carlos, 195224. Buenos Aires: Puntosur Editores.Google Scholar
Palomino, Mirta L. de. 1988. Tradición y Poder: La Sociedad Rural Argentina, 1955–1983. Buenos Aires: CISEA: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.Google Scholar
Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge Studies in Modern Political Economies. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pastor, Daniel. 2004. “Origins of the Chilean Binominal Election System.” Revista de Ciencia Política 24: 3857.Google Scholar
Paulet Piedra, Nicole. 2013. “Legislative Hurdles to Land Reform: The Role of the Bancada Ruralista in the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies, 1995–2006.” Senior Thesis, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Payne, Leigh A. 2000. Uncivil Movements: The Armed Right Wing and Democracy in Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pereira, Amanda Maria Campanini. 2013. “A Lógica da Ação na Reforma do Código Florestal.” M.A. Dissertation, São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Pereira, Anthony. 2003. “Brazil’s Land reform: Democratic Innovation or Oligarchic Exclusion Redux?Latin American Politics and Society 45 (2): 4165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez Guadalupe, José Luis, and Grundberger, Sebastian, eds. 2018. Evangélicos y Poder en América Latina. Lima: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung / Instituto de Estudios Social Cristianos.Google Scholar
Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2014. “A Two-Level Theory of Presidential Instability.” Latin American Politics and Society 56 (01): 3454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (02): 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David, ed. 2001. Civil-Military Relations in Latin America: New Analytical Perspectives. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Pizarro, Crisóstomo. 1995. “La Primera Reforma Tributaria durante el Gobierno de Transición: Concertación y Debate.” In Políticas Económicas y Sociales en el Chile Democrático, edited by Joaquín Vial, Dagmar Raczynski, and Crisóstomo Pizarro, 93128. Santiago de Chile: CIEPLAN – UNICEF.Google Scholar
Pollack, Marcelo. 1999. The New Right in Chile 1973–97. St Antony’s Series. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Power, Timothy J. 2000. The Political Right in Postauthoritarian Brazil: Elites, Institutions, and Democratization. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Power, Timothy J. 2010. “Optimism, Pessimism, and Coalitional Presidentialism: Debating the Institutional Design of Brazilian Democracy.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 29 (1): 1833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, Timothy J. 2018. “The Contrasting Trajectories of Brazil’s Two Authoritarian Successor Parties.” In Life After Dictatorship: Authoritarian Successor Parties Worldwide, edited by Loxton, James and Mainwaring, Scott, 229–53. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Power, Timothy J., and Rodrigues-Silveira, Rodrigo. 2019. “The Political Right and Party Politics.” In Routledge Handbook of Brazilian Politics, edited by Ames, Barry, 251–68. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rasmusen, Eric. 2007. Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory. 4th ed. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Rehren, Alfredo. 1995. “Empresarios, Transición y Consolidación Democrática en Chile.” Revista Chilena de Ciencia Política 17 (1/2): 561.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen L. 1984. Party Competition in Argentina and Chile: Political Recruitment and Public Policy, 1890–1930. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Vanderlei Vazelesk. 2008. Cuestiones Agrarias en el Varguismo y el Peronismo: Una Mirada Histórica. Colección Convergencia. Entre Memoria y Sociedad. Bernal, Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes Editorial.Google Scholar
Richardson, Neal. 2012. “The Politics of Abundance: Export Agriculture and Redistributive Conflict in South America.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Riedl, Rachel Beatty, Slater, Dan, Wong, Joseph, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2020. “Authoritarian-Led Democratization.” Annual Review of Political Science 23 (1): 315–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Nils, and Victor, Jennifer Nicoll. 2013. Bridging the Information Gap: Legislative Member Organizations as Social Networks in the United States and the European Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
J. Timmons, Roberts, and Thanos, Nikki Demetria. 2003. Trouble in Paradise: Globalization and Environmental Crises in Latin America. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth. 1998. Deepening Democracy? The Modern Left and Social Movements in Chile and Peru. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth. 2002. “Party–Society Linkages and Democratic Representation in Latin America.” Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 27 (53): 934.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth. 2014. “Democracy, Free Markets and the Rightist Dilemma in Latin America.” In The Resilience of the Latin American Right, edited by Luna, Juan Pablo and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, 2547. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Robins, Nicholas A., and Fraser, Barbara J.. 2020. Landscapes of Inequity: Environmental Justice in the Andes-Amazon Region. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robles, Wilder. 2018. “Revisiting Land reform in Brazil, 1985–2016.” Journal of Developing Societies 34 (1): 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robles, Wilder, and Veltmeyer, Henry. 2015. The Politics of Land Reform in Brazil. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.Google Scholar
Rojas, Priscilla, and Navia, Patricio. 2005. “Representación y Tamaño de los Distritos Electorales en Chile, 1988–2002.” Revista de Ciencia Política 25 (2): 91116.Google Scholar
Romero Pizarro, Sergio. 2015. Una Mirada a Chile: Al Rescate de los Valores Republicanos. Santiago de Chile: Aguilar Chilena de Ediciones.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2018. Party Vibrancy and Democracy in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothkopf, David J. 2009. Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Salto, Dante, and Levy, Daniel. 2021. “La Educación Superior con Fines de Lucro en América Latina: ¿Excepción o Precursora?International Higher Education 108: 3436.Google Scholar
Samuels, David. 2003. Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 2003. “Presidentialism, Elections and Representation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15 (1): 3360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, Sérgio. 2019. “Rural Brazil during the Lula Administrations: Agreements with Agribusiness and Disputes in Agrarian Policies.” Latin American Perspectives 46 (4): 103–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, Sérgio, and Mészáros, George. 2017. “The Political Economy of Land Struggle in Brazil under Workers’ Party Governments.” Journal of Agrarian Change 17 (2): 397414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross. 1997. “Organized Business Politics in Democratic Brazil.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 39 (4): 95127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross. 2004. Business Politics and the State in Twentieth-Century Latin America. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross. 2010. “Business Politics in Latin America: Patterns of Fragmentation and Centralization.” In The Oxford Handbook of Business and Government, edited by Coen, David, Grant, Wyn, and Wilson, Graham, 307–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross. 2013. Hierarchical Capitalism in Latin America: Business, Labor, and the Challenges of Equitable Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scully, Timothy. 1992. Rethinking the Center: Party Politics in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Chile. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 1997. “Continuity and Change in the Chilean Party System: On the Transformational Effects of Electoral Reform.” Comparative Political Studies 30 (6): 651–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 2002. “The Hidden Logic of Candidate Selection for Chilean Parliamentary Elections.” Comparative Politics 34 (4): 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, Eduardo. 1998. “Organized Business, Neoliberal Economic Restructuring, and Democratization in Chile.” In Organized Business, Economic Change, and Democracy in Latin America, edited by Durand, Francisco and Silva, Eduardo, 217–52. Coral Gables, FL: North-South Center Press.Google Scholar
Silva, Patricio. 1987. Estado, Neoliberalismo y Política Agraria en Chile 1973–1981. Amsterdam: CEDLA / FORIS Publications.Google Scholar
Silva, Patricio. 1992. “Landowners and the State: From Confrontation to Cooperation?” In Development and Social Change in the Chilean Countryside: From the Pre-Land Reform Period to the Democratic Transition, edited by Kay, Cristóbal and Silva, Patricio, 275–88. Amsterdam: CEDLA.Google Scholar
Slater, Dan. 2010. Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, Dan, and Simmons, Erica. 2010. “Informative Regress: Critical Antecedents in Comparative Politics.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (7): 886917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, Dan, and Wong, Joseph. 2013. “The Strength to Concede: Ruling Parties and Democratization in Developmental Asia.” Perspectives on Politics 11 (3): 717–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, Dan, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2013. “The Enduring Indispensability of the Controlled Comparison.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (10): 1301–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Mark A. 2000. American Business and Political Power: Public Opinion, Elections, and Democracy. Studies in Communication, Media, and Public Opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Peter. 1969. Politics and Beef in Argentina. Patterns of Conflict and Change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter. 1978. “The Breakdown of Democracy in Argentina.” In The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Latin America, 327. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Richard, and Samuels, David. 2004. “Legislative Malapportionment in Latin America.” In Federalism and Democracy, edited by Gibson, Edward L., 131–72. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Stabili, María Rosaria. 2003. El Sentimiento Aristocrático: Elites Chilenas frente al Espejo (1860–1960). Santiago de Chile: Ed. Andrés Bello.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Natasha Borges, and Hunter, Wendy. 2013. “Whither Clientelism?: Good Governance and Brazil’s Bolsa Família Program.” Comparative Politics 46 (1): 4362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svampa, Maristella. 2019. Neo-extractivism in Latin America: Socio-environmental Conflicts, the Territorial Turn, and New Political Narratives. Cambridge Elements. Elements in Politics and Society in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szakonyi, David. 2018. “Businesspeople in Elected Office: Identifying Private Benefits from Firm-Level Returns.” American Political Science Review 112 (02): 322–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szakonyi, David. 2020. Politics for Profit: Business, Elections, and Policymaking in Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taagepera, Rein, and Soberg Shugart, Matthew. 1991. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tamayo Grez, Tania, and Carmona López, Alejandra. 2019. El Negocio del Agua: Cómo Chile se Convirtió en Tierra Seca. Santiago de Chile: B.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. 2nd ed. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thachil, Tariq. 2014. Elite Parties, Poor Voters: How Social Services Win Votes in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2003. “How Institutions Evolve.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Rueschemeyer, Dietrich and Mahoney, James, 208–40. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tommasi, Mariano, Saiegh, Sebastián, Sanguinetti, Pablo, Stein, Ernesto, and Cárdenas, Mauricio. 2001. “Fiscal Federalism in Argentina: Policies, Politics, and Institutional Reform [with Comments].” Economía 1 (2): 157211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Brian. 2014. “Paraguay: La Vuelta del Partido Colorado al Poder.” Revista de Ciencia Política 34 (1): 249–66.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 1977. Political Brokers in Chile: Local Government in a Centralized Polity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 1978. Chile. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, J. Samuel, and Scully, Timothy R.. 1997. “Electoral Choices and the Party System in Chile: Continuities and Changes at the Recovery of Democracy.” Comparative Politics 29 (4): 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Cott, Donna Lee. 2005. From Movements to Parties in Latin America the Evolution of Ethnic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velasco Montoya, Juan David. 2018. “Colombia: De Minorías Dispersas a Aliados Estratégicos.” In Evangélicos y Poder en América Latina, edited by Guadalupe, José Luis Pérez and Grundberger, Sebastian, 221–45. Lima: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung/ Instituto de Estudios Social Cristianos.Google Scholar
Velásquez Carrillo, Carlos. 2020. “La Reconsolidación del Régimen Oligárquico en El Salvador: Los Ejes de la Transformación Neoliberal.” In Concentración Económica y Poder Político en América Latina, edited by North, Liisa, Rubio, Blanca, Acosta, Alberto, and Pástor, Carlos, 180215. CLACSO.Google Scholar
Vergara, Alberto, and Augusto, María Claudia. 2021. “Fujimorismo and the Limits of Democratic Representation in Peru, 2006–2020.” In Diminished Parties: Democratic Representation in Contemporary Latin America, edited by Luna, Juan Pablo, Rodríguez, Rafael Piñeiro, Rosenblatt, Fernando, and Vommaro, Gabriel, 236–63. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vergara-Camus, Leandro, and Kay, Cristóbal. 2017a. “Agribusiness, Peasants, Leftwing Governments, and the State in Latin America: An Overview and Theoretical Reflections.” Journal of Agrarian Change 17 (2): 239–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vergara-Camus, Leandro, and Kay, Cristóbal. 2017b. “The Agrarian Political Economy of Leftwing Governments in Latin America: Agribusiness, Peasants, and the Limits of Neo-Developmentalism.” Journal of Agrarian Change 17 (2): 415–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigna, Edélcio. 2001. “Bancada Ruralista: Um Grupo de Interesse.” Argumento 8 (December): 152.Google Scholar
Vigna, Edélcio. 2012. “Análise das Negociações entre a Bancada Ruralista e o Governo Federal nas Votações do Código Florestal.” INESC.Google Scholar
Vollrath, Dietrich. 2007. “Land Distribution and International Agricultural Productivity.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89 (1): 202–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vommaro, Gabriel. 2019. “De la Construcción Partidaria al Gobierno: PRO-Cambiemos y los Límites del ‘Giro a la Derecha’ en Argentina.” Colombia Internacional 99: 91120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vommaro, Gabriel. 2021. “Horizontal Coordination and Vertical Aggregation Mechanisms of the PRO in Argentina and Its Subnational Variations.” In Diminished Parties: Democratic Representation in Contemporary Latin America, edited by Luna, Juan Pablo, Rodríguez, Rafael Piñeiro, Rosenblatt, Fernando, and Vommaro, Gabriel, 1st ed., 4869. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vommaro, Gabriel, and Morresi, Sergio, eds. 2015. “Hagamos Equipo”: PRO y la Construcción de la Nueva Derecha en Argentina. Colección Política, Políticas y Sociedad. Los Polvorines: Ediciones UNGS, Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento.Google Scholar
Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca. 2012. “What Wins Votes: Why Some Politicians Opt Out of Clientelism.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (3): 568–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt Gerhard. 1996. Democracy without Equity: Failures of Reform in Brazil. Pitt Latin American Series. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt Gerhard. 2014. Making Waves: Democratic Contention in Europe and Latin America since the Revolutions of 1848. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt Gerhard. 2019. Revolution and Reaction: The Diffusion of Authoritarianism in Latin America. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2000. Forging Democracy from Below: Insurgent Transitions in South Africa and El Salvador. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2001. “An Insurgent Path to Democracy: Popular Mobilization, Economic Interests, and Regime Transition in South Africa and El Salvador.” Comparative Political Studies 34 (8): 862–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Thomas C. 1981. Landowners and Reform in Chile: The Sociedad Nacional de Agricultura 1919–1940. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Yashar, Deborah J. 1997. Demanding Democracy: Reform and Reaction in Costa Rica and Guatemala, 1870s–1950s. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Kevin. 2015. “Not by Structure Alone: Power, Prominence, and Agency in American Finance.” Business and Politics 17 (3): 443–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamora, Rubén. 1998. El Salvador, Heridas que No Cierran: Los Partidos Políticos en la Post-Guerra. San Salvador: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Maurice, and Earl Ratcliff, Richard. 1988. Landlords & Capitalists: The Dominant Class of Chile. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel. 2008. “Does Landholding Inequality Block Democratization?: A Test of the ‘Bread and Democracy’ Thesis and the Case of Prussia.” World Politics 60 (04): 610–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel. 2017. Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucco, Cesar. 2007. “Where’s the Bias? A Reassessment of the Chilean Electoral System.” Electoral Studies 26 (2): 303–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucco, Cesar. 2013. “When Payouts Pay Off: Conditional Cash Transfers and Voting Behavior in Brazil 2002–10.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (4): 810–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucco, Cesar, and Power, Timothy J.. 2021. “Fragmentation Without Cleavages? Endogenous Fractionalization in the Brazilian Party System.” Comparative Politics 53 (3): 477500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×