Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:18:08.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - 1970s to Present – A Time of Convergence?

from Part III - Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2011

Steven A. Bank
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

The three themes discussed in the previous chapters – profits, power, and politics – have each continued to influence the modern debate over corporate tax reform in the United Kingdom and the United States during the last twenty years. American politicians have maintained their focus on the paucity of dividends and the actions of managers while their British counterparts revived their concern about shareholder expropriation and inadequate retained earnings. Moreover, political changes have ushered in dramatic reforms in both countries, although in the case of the USA the modification to the tax treatment of dividends that was ultimately enacted in 2003 was once again less radical than the original proposal and fell short of the goal of full integration. In the latest round of reforms, these common themes seem to be pushing the two systems toward convergence rather than divergence, which seems predictable in light of the growth of multinational corporations and the globalization of commerce. What is uncertain, however, is the effect of developments outside of each country, such as the growing power of the European Union, the European Court of Justice, and other countries, in dictating whether convergence is inevitable or even possible.

United Kingdom

In the mid 1990s, the UK once again became concerned with dividends and firm investment. A 1995 study published by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (“IFS”) announced that there had been a dramatic rise in the percentage of profits paid out as dividends during the previous decade. In a press release accompanying this announcement, the IFS noted that “[t]he dividend payout ratio . . . is higher in the UK than in any other major economy. There is a danger that these high dividend payouts are having an adverse effect on business investment.” Other studies reached similar conclusions regarding the dangers of increased dividends. By 1997, with dividends continuing to rise and Labour poised to retake power for the first time in eighteen years, the corporate tax system appeared to be headed for another revision.

Type
Chapter
Information
Anglo-American Corporate Taxation
Tracing the Common Roots of Divergent Approaches
, pp. 223 - 249
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bond, StephenCompany Dividends and Taxes in the UKFiscal Studies 16 1996 3Google Scholar
Gammie, MalcolmThe End of Imputation: Changes in UK Dividend TaxationIntertax 25 1997 333Google Scholar
Riley, BarryReaping Tory dividendsFinancial TimesLondon 1997 1Google Scholar
Peston, RobertBrown may scrap dividend creditFinancial TimesLondon 1997 1Google Scholar
Kelly, JimUnder fire for ‘victimless’ tax increase: Brown may defy critics over dividend creditsFinancial TimesLondon 1997 11Google Scholar
Column, LexTaxing timesFinancial TimesLondon 1997 22Google Scholar
Coggan, PhilipNot the easy optionFinancial TimesLondon 1997 8Google Scholar
Brown’s first Budget – business and market reactionFinancial TimesLondon 1997 3
Casson, PeterInternational Aspects of the UK Imputation System of Corporate TaxationBritish Tax Review 5 1998 493Google Scholar
Avi-Yonah, ReuvenBack to the 1930s? The Shaky Case for Exempting DividendsTax Notes 97 2002 1599Google Scholar
Tontsch, AndreasCorporation Tax Systems and Fiscal Neutrality: The UK and German Systems and their Recent ChangesIntertax 30 2002 178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiley, JohnThe United KingdomComparative Income Taxation: A Structural AnalysisAult, Hugh J.Arnold, Brian J.New YorkAspen Publishers 2010 147Google Scholar
Mitchell, CarolineTreasury urged to reprieve tax credit for poorThe TimesLondon 1998Google Scholar
Lumsden, GavinDismay over refusal to restore tax creditsThe TimesLondon 1998Google Scholar
Charles, JamesWhere the manifestos hit our walletsThe TimesLondon 2010 82Google Scholar
Bell, LeonieJenkinson, TimNew Evidence of the Impact of Dividend Taxation and on the Identity of the Marginal InvestorJournal of Finance 57 2002 1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searjeant, GrahamSeven years on, Brown’s swoop on pensions looks less cleverThe TimesLondon 2004 58Google Scholar
Kaletsky, AnatoleRegulations killed the pensions industryThe TimesLondon 2006 35Google Scholar
Webster, PhilipHurst, GregBrown slaps down claim that he wiped £1bn from pensionsThe TimesLondon 2007 22Google Scholar
Rozenberg, GabrielSeib, ChristineTories may restore tax credit for pensionsThe TimesLondon 2005 41Google Scholar
Severiens, Jacob T.Does a Dividend Tax Credit WorkTaxes 54 1976 17Google Scholar
Cox, John H.The Corporate Income Tax and Integration: A Summary of Positions and the Prospects for ChangeTaxes 58 1980 10Google Scholar
Hickman, Frederic W.Tax Equity and the Need for CapitalNational Tax Journal 28 1975 282Google Scholar
Art PineCarter’s dividend tax proposal is in troubleWashington Post 1977 D7Google Scholar
Sullivan, Martin A.Dividend : Will Double Tax Relief Get Canned – AgainTax Notes 98 2003 647Google Scholar
Lawrence Fox, H.Washington Tax WatchJournal of Corporate Taxation 2 1975 360Google Scholar
Lawrence Fox, H.Jackson, James K.Washington Tax WatchJournal of Corporate Taxation 3 1976 176Google Scholar
Stratton, SherylLubick Looks at Treasury Past and Treasury PresentTax Notes 84 1999 1702Google Scholar
Smith, James E.The Dividend and Interest Exclusions: A Changing SceneTaxes 60 1982 240Google Scholar
Eustice, James S.The Tax Reform Act of 1986: Analysis and CommentaryBostonWarren, Gorham & Lamont 1987 2Google Scholar
Leonard, Robert J.A Pragmatic View of Corporate IntegrationTax Notes 35 1987 889Google Scholar
Staff of the Joint Committee on TaxationGeneral Explanation of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 1987 336
Richardson, JoannaIntegration Faces ‘Marketing Problem,’ Says Treasury’s HubbardTax Notes Today 92 1992 193Google Scholar
Lahart, JustinCash-rich firms urged to spendWall Street Journal 2005 C1Google Scholar
Glassman, James K.Numbers you can trustWashington Post 2002 H1Google Scholar
Gompers, PaulMetrick, AndrewSiegel, JeremyThis tax cut will pay dividendsWall Street Journal 2002 A20Google Scholar
McCaffery, Edward J.Remove a major incentive to cheatWall Street Journal 2002 B2Google Scholar
Garrett, ElizabethAccounting for the Federal Budget and its ReformHarvard Journal on Legislation 41 2004 187Google Scholar
Murray, ShailaghMcKinnon, John D.Democrats’ confidence grows about shrinking Bush tax cutWall Street Journal 2002Google Scholar
Krim, JonathanTech companies see Bush plan on dividends as troublesomeWashington Post 2003 E1Google Scholar
Hook, JanetBush plan to end dividend tax in for changesLos Angeles Times 2003 A30Google Scholar
Norris, FloydBush’s plan taxes certain dividends, fine print revealsNew York Times 2003 A1Google Scholar
Weisman, JonathanAllen, MikeBush seeks to enlist economists’ support; growth plan has gathered considerable oppositionWashington Post 2003 A7Google Scholar
Mohr, PattiRojas, WarrenInterest Groups Test Bush Idea of ‘Single Tax’ on DividendsTax Notes 98 2003 1471Google Scholar
Desai, Mihir A.The Decentering of the Global FirmThe World EconomyOxfordBlackwell Publishing 2009 1271Google Scholar
Barry, FrankTax Policy, FDI and the Irish Economic Boom of the 1990sEconomic Analysis & Policy 33 2003 221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darby, Joseph B.Lemaster, KelseyDouble Irish More Than Doubles the Tax SavingsPractical US/International Tax Strategies 11 2007 2Google Scholar
Craig, AlistairEU Law and British Tax: Which Comes FirstLondonThe Chameleon Press 2003 11Google Scholar
Graetz, Michael J.Warren, Jr Alvin C.Income Tax Discrimination and the Political and Economic Integration of EuropeYale Law Journal 115 2006 1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graetz, Michael J.Warren, Jr Alvin C.Dividend Taxation in Europe: When the ECJ Makes Tax PolicyCommon Market Law Review 44 2007 1577Google Scholar
Gammie, MalcolmUK Imputation, Past, Present and FutureBulletin for International Fiscal Documentation 52 1998 429Google Scholar
Harris, PeterOliver, DavidInternational Commercial TaxCambridge University Press 2010 294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, GaryChancellor accused of losing control of corporate tax to EUThe TimesLondon 2003 41Google Scholar
Rozenberg, GabrielCorporate tax review eyes return of poundThe TimesLondon 2007 62Google Scholar
McLure, Jr Charles E.Harmonizing Corporate Income Taxes in the European Community: Rationale and ImplicationsTax Policy & Economics 22 2008 151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betterndorf, LeonCorporate Tax Harmonization in EuropeEconomic Policy 2010 539Google Scholar
Judge, ElizabethSingle European tax could cost UK business £4 bn, academics warnThe TimesLondon 2007 55Google Scholar
Searjeant, GrahamEU has company tax in its sightsThe TimesLondon 2005 61Google Scholar
Killian, SheilaWhere’s the Harm in Tax Competition? Lessons from US Multinationals in IrelandCritical Perspectives on Accounting 17 2006 1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingson, Charles I.The Great American Jobs Act CaperTax Law Review 58 2005 327Google Scholar
Duncan, GaryChancellor told to cut Corporation TaxThe TimesLondon 2006 56Google Scholar
Buckley, ChristineCut tax or lose more business, says CBIThe TimesLondon 2006 52Google Scholar
Buckley, ChristineEmployers and unions lobby over corporate tax rates and non domsThe TimesLondon 2008 44Google Scholar
Jagger, SuzyCorporation Tax cuts make us global players, say business leadersThe TimesLondon 2010 14Google Scholar
Jagger, SuzyCorporate tax will be the lowest in G20, Osborne promises CBIThe TimesLondon 2010 39Google Scholar
Gilmore, GrainneTaxman will be deprived of millions of pounds in the great dividend payoutThe TimesLondon 2010 58Google Scholar
Merrill, Peter R.Corporate Tax Policy for the 21st CenturyNational Tax Journal 63 2010 623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gravelle, Jane G.Hungerford, Thomas L.Corporate Tax Reform: Issues for CongressCongressional Research Service Report for Congress 2010Google Scholar
US Department of the TreasuryTreasury Conference on Business Taxation and Global CompetitivenessBackground Paper 2007Google Scholar
Congressional Budget OfficeCorporate Income Tax Rates: International ComparisonsComparisons 2005Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×